It's even funnier when you know all these "photos" of the deep space are black and white and have no color and are not actually photos but a vague signal they get from a direction
Then they are being colored by the NASA/ESA PR agency team on the ASSUMPTION that one specific object is of that color.
No, just telling people how things actually work in the space industry.
There are no photos of black holes and the colors of stars and planets are not real because all they see through the telescope is a 0.001x0.001 white pixel on the black background
>When Hubble scientists take photos of space, they use filters to record specific wavelengths of light. Later, they add red, green, or blue to color the exposures taken through those filters. The result is full-color images that have a variety of purposes for scientific analysis.
>When Hubble scientists take photos of space, they use filters to record specific wavelengths of light. Later, they add red, green, or blue to color the exposures taken through those filters. The result is full-color images that have a variety of purposes for scientific analysis.
deep matter my ass
they dont know shit about what's going on outside of our own galaxy let alone the sheer number of different chemicals that can exist on other planets
They are using the wavelength method which is based on the types of already known and proven theorems
>the way it is colorized is based in science
Oh yes, the highly scientific science of astronomy, where they consider if some light blinks for a moment that means a planet passed in front of it
so what else, in your professional opinion, causes the periodic blinking of a star with the exact expected luminosity curve of a huge object passing in front of a star? is it just god twisting the dial on his DMX lighting controller?
2 years ago
Anonymous
>causes the periodic blinking of a star with the exact expected luminosity curve of a huge object passing in front of a star?
>i expect x to have y effect >y effect happens >therefore x
2 years ago
Anonymous
it would appear to be the most reasonable guess as to what is going on. as you say, afaik it isn't an established fact yet, so you are welcome to make a reasonable guess.
>what else, in your professional opinion, causes the periodic blinking of a star
what causes a lamp to blink?
>with the exact expected luminosity
expect because of experiments? done here? in a lab? or because of the "standard model"?
>what causes a lamp to blink?
what does a lamp have to do with a star?
>expect because of experiments? done here? in a lab?
yeah because optics and geometry don't magically stop working at great distances
2 years ago
Anonymous
>optics and geometry don't magically stop working at great distances
They do if you assume the great distances are even the true distances to being with
2 years ago
Anonymous
>what else, in your professional opinion, causes the periodic blinking of a star
what causes a lamp to blink?
>with the exact expected luminosity
expect because of experiments? done here? in a lab? or because of the "standard model"?
2 years ago
Anonymous
>is it just god twisting the dial on his DMX lighting controller?
Stars are considered fortresses of angels in Judaism, so it's probably just some of them sleeping or some regular scheduled maintenance of their lights
JWST is also infrared, so all the pictures are red in colour. All the "variety of colours" are just digitally manipulated into how scientists think they look.
Like how NASA ups the saturation of how Mars "looks", making it x10 more red to appeal to normies?
2 years ago
Anonymous
is that real mars or fake mars
2 years ago
Anonymous
Real Mars. Real Mars has a dull, greyish red colour.
In NASA photos, it's fricking blood red.
2 years ago
Anonymous
where did you get your first pic then??? telescope?
2 years ago
Anonymous
this is from NASA's website though
2 years ago
Anonymous
Tge planet also changes color in seasons.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>posting a gamma-corrected image
Real Mars. Real Mars has a dull, greyish red colour.
In NASA photos, it's fricking blood red.
that is not a nasa picture
2 years ago
Anonymous
Real Mars. Real Mars has a dull, greyish red colour.
In NASA photos, it's fricking blood red.
There's a difference between telescopes in space and telescopes on earth. If you look up at the sky and see for yourself it's fricking red. I imagine that it may look a lot different from space compared to what it looks like through our atmosphere. The sun for instance is white in space rather than yellow or orange.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Whenever I looked at planets on mmy telescope they were black and white
>The galaxies are all redshifted so it's a faithful representation if we were closer
that isn't how light works you fricking moron
2 years ago
Anonymous
That literally is how it works, mutt. Each colour has its own wavelength. If you’re light source is 100,000 light years away, you’re going to rely on infrared
2 years ago
Anonymous
no american is right that's not how light works
2 years ago
Anonymous
They shift the wavelengths. Say you have infrared light from 1000 to 1500 nm. You can divide the wavelength by 2.5 and get a range of 400 to 600 nm. Which is in the visible range.
The thing is it's kinda meaningless to talk about "real" colors. Our eyes would not even be able to see most of this shit because it's shifted so far into the infrared that it's outside the spectrum of visible light. And the rest is so dim that our eyes can't pick up enough light to make out details.
If you could actually go in space and observe the brightest stuff it would mostly look like a fuzzy red/white haze. You wouldn't ever be able to actually see such details as you can from telescopes.
The best way to get a good idea of this is to get a good pair of binoculars and go out on a very dark night and look for the Andromeda galaxy. It will appear as a very diffuse patch of white light.
All the colors you see from telescope images do correspond to certain wavelengths though, so they are internally consistent and that's all that matters.
this is only because human eyes are dogshit. you have to translate the incomprehensible radiations to something we can actually see. another animal with better eyes could probably just see the raw image in its totality
No, just telling people how things actually work in the space industry.
There are no photos of black holes and the colors of stars and planets are not real because all they see through the telescope is a 0.001x0.001 white pixel on the black background
>When Hubble scientists take photos of space, they use filters to record specific wavelengths of light. Later, they add red, green, or blue to color the exposures taken through those filters. The result is full-color images that have a variety of purposes for scientific analysis.
[...]
deep matter my ass
they dont know shit about what's going on outside of our own galaxy let alone the sheer number of different chemicals that can exist on other planets
They are using the wavelength method which is based on the types of already known and proven theorems
JWST is also infrared, so all the pictures are red in colour. All the "variety of colours" are just digitally manipulated into how scientists think they look.
This image is fricking fake!
The photographer just slapped together different B/W photos from different filters and digitally manipulated it to add color!!
Fricking Photoshop we have no fricking idea if this man's coat should really be blue, brown, black or fricking green. It's all just lies to make LE PRETTY REDDIT PHOTO I fricking hate israelites.
>This image took $10,000,000,000 to create.
Don't ever forget that, americans, when you're paying 6 dollars a gallon, or when you can't pay for you medical bills, or when you have to pay for you college loan, or you you're 1 week away from being physically removed from your home because you can't pay the mortgage or rent
Engineers are the true heroes of science, the rest just uptakes a lot of money for either useless bullshit or to create more tools of enslavement to the State
this, it's all jsut illustrations made with photoshop or some shit
>the ASSUMPTION that one specific object is of that color
infrared doesn't have a "colour", because it isn't visible to the naked eye, you fricking moron
Here is a picture of what you can see by using the Hubble and this picture has been 400% upscaled for the PR purposes
In reality all they can see is a 700x400 pixel picture
You can't see anything. It's just sensors and computers that create a picture which is then adapted to be seen by our eyes.
The reds you see are probably infrared light, invisible to the naked eye.
i understand that they can take pictures of space, but what technology is the one that allows them to know what planets are made of? or those are all just assumptions.
Colour wavelengths and brightness on the image over a duration of time helps them understand gas compositions (if the colours shift). And I think brightness determines distance and other phenomena that happens that may distort light
>gas compositions
Earth based gas compositions
nothing stops some unknown chemicals to exist in the space so these are just assumptions based on what we know about Earth only
>nothing stops some unknown chemicals
It's not about "chemicals", it's about the elements and we do quite literally know what all the elements are.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>we do quite literally know what all the elements are
Elements of the Moon, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn and Earth (also a few comets and asteroids)
We dont know shit about what elements the space has to offer
2 years ago
Anonymous
an atom with 6 protons and 6 electrons is going to be the same here, in a different planet, and in a different galaxy
2 years ago
Anonymous
This is a theory that only works in our environment. A theory just like all planets and large space objects in general do have a core.
A theory is not a fact, especially when we use the scientific method
2 years ago
Anonymous
Russians are seriously so god damned stupid
2 years ago
Anonymous
2+2 is 4. That is a fact based on math as we know it
Planets having a core is a theory that is widely accepted by the scientists
2 years ago
Anonymous
but dude, what if the entire field of chemistry is invalid
2 years ago
Anonymous
I'm not saying they are wrong or invalid. All I'm saying is one thing can work on Earth and work differently or simply not work somewhere else.
They have theorised so much that they have to INVENT the dark matter because there was no other explanation for the objects moving differently other than an X fricking shit up when calculating things
2 years ago
Anonymous
This is the country that invented Lysenkoism and ended up starving to death because of it so it shouldn't be surprising.
2 years ago
Anonymous
How does someone from a country that discovered like half the periodic table not understand how elements work.
Russia-kun, what has happened?
2 years ago
Anonymous
>periodic table
israeli lies. there are only 4 atoms: fire atoms, water atoms, earth atoms, wood atoms
2 years ago
Anonymous
They had Mendeleev too
2 years ago
Anonymous
elements and chemicals are diffrent things
there are thousands of chemicals made out of carbon and just because there's detectable wavelenght specific to carbon doesnt mean whole planet is made out of diamond
2 years ago
Anonymous
yes, to be more clear: 4 basic atoms bond together to form elements and elements interact with each other differently thus creating different chemicals. for example fire and earth combined creates an element called carbon and this carbon can create coal or gem both have %50 chance
the jwst deep field pic took 12 hours of exposure to capture, it took the hubble 2 week to do the same and with a fraction of the quality.
every scientific/academic institution in NA, EU, Japan & Aus is willing to suck dick to get access to it. they will be able to do more science in a few hours than they have in an entire century.
It's amazing
There's so much fricking space out there, just like you could go on an imaginary spacecraft travelling at the speed of light and yet you'd get nowhere, there'd still be so much FRICKING SPACE
And stars
Christ Almighty
Yeah it's fricking huge man
I hardly ever think about it but it's just baffling how large the universe is, even our galaxy is unimaginably huge and yet when we see this image we see hundreds possibly a thousand galaxies in a tiny part of the night sky, just everywhere
So many fricking galaxies, so many stars
So much distance
Don't you ever think about it?
>DUDE LOOK BLACKNESS WITH SOME LIGHTS THAT'S HECKIN EPIC BRO!!!! >I FRICKING LOVE SCIENCE!!!
why do I care again?
Space doesn't have lemurs, giraffes, the Amazon rainforest, the Colosseum, the Pyramids of Giza, the Grand Canyon and kangaroos.
Space has boring, featureless rocks and balls of fire. Both of which I can find on Earth anyways.
FYI there are no aliens either.
>why do I care again? >Space doesn't have lemurs, giraffes, the Amazon rainforest, the Colosseum, the Pyramids of Giza, the Grand Canyon and kangaroos. >Space has boring, featureless rocks and balls of fire. Both of which I can find on Earth anyways. >FYI there are no aliens either.
If they're just like us but look like disgusting freakish creatures I don't want to know about it. Somewhere out there is a planet of sexy alien babes...
Crazy how so many of those galaxies look like they're some kind of vortex, huh. It's almost as if space itself is a fluid and matter just gathers itself where there are pressure differentials, and not the other way round.
That’s a small part of the entire actual image and you can see entire galaxies magnified through gravity lensing around a cluster that’s pretty cool
How many NASA fanboys here read "ringmakers of Saturn"?
no it didnt
Lmao@ Texas morons.
The hubble and Webb projects cost well over 10 gorillion shillings
they should have given these money to ukraine
This was more expensive.
Also: I have just ruined this thread lmao
They'll use the telescope for thousands of other pictures dumbass.
Taking that picture probably costed just a few millions. People in Hollywood are very good at that.
Movie budgets don't count THOUGH
It's even funnier when you know all these "photos" of the deep space are black and white and have no color and are not actually photos but a vague signal they get from a direction
Then they are being colored by the NASA/ESA PR agency team on the ASSUMPTION that one specific object is of that color.
Still salty that you lost the space race?
No, just telling people how things actually work in the space industry.
There are no photos of black holes and the colors of stars and planets are not real because all they see through the telescope is a 0.001x0.001 white pixel on the black background
>When Hubble scientists take photos of space, they use filters to record specific wavelengths of light. Later, they add red, green, or blue to color the exposures taken through those filters. The result is full-color images that have a variety of purposes for scientific analysis.
>lost
They were the first to space.
Russia won the space race no matter how much the USA no achktually-ied the rules
>I was leading for the first 90m of the 100m race so therefore I won
have a nice day Black person
that's not how false color works
That's incorrect.
The images are not in color but the way it is colorized is based in science and not arbitrary artistic choice.
deep matter my ass
they dont know shit about what's going on outside of our own galaxy let alone the sheer number of different chemicals that can exist on other planets
They are using the wavelength method which is based on the types of already known and proven theorems
>the way it is colorized is based in science
Oh yes, the highly scientific science of astronomy, where they consider if some light blinks for a moment that means a planet passed in front of it
so what else, in your professional opinion, causes the periodic blinking of a star with the exact expected luminosity curve of a huge object passing in front of a star? is it just god twisting the dial on his DMX lighting controller?
>causes the periodic blinking of a star with the exact expected luminosity curve of a huge object passing in front of a star?
>i expect x to have y effect
>y effect happens
>therefore x
it would appear to be the most reasonable guess as to what is going on. as you say, afaik it isn't an established fact yet, so you are welcome to make a reasonable guess.
>what causes a lamp to blink?
what does a lamp have to do with a star?
>expect because of experiments? done here? in a lab?
yeah because optics and geometry don't magically stop working at great distances
>optics and geometry don't magically stop working at great distances
They do if you assume the great distances are even the true distances to being with
>what else, in your professional opinion, causes the periodic blinking of a star
what causes a lamp to blink?
>with the exact expected luminosity
expect because of experiments? done here? in a lab? or because of the "standard model"?
>is it just god twisting the dial on his DMX lighting controller?
Stars are considered fortresses of angels in Judaism, so it's probably just some of them sleeping or some regular scheduled maintenance of their lights
JWST is also infrared, so all the pictures are red in colour. All the "variety of colours" are just digitally manipulated into how scientists think they look.
The galaxies are all redshifted so it's a faithful representation if we were closer
>faithful representation
Like how NASA ups the saturation of how Mars "looks", making it x10 more red to appeal to normies?
is that real mars or fake mars
Real Mars. Real Mars has a dull, greyish red colour.
In NASA photos, it's fricking blood red.
where did you get your first pic then??? telescope?
this is from NASA's website though
Tge planet also changes color in seasons.
>posting a gamma-corrected image
that is not a nasa picture
There's a difference between telescopes in space and telescopes on earth. If you look up at the sky and see for yourself it's fricking red. I imagine that it may look a lot different from space compared to what it looks like through our atmosphere. The sun for instance is white in space rather than yellow or orange.
Whenever I looked at planets on mmy telescope they were black and white
You are completely colorblind.
>The galaxies are all redshifted so it's a faithful representation if we were closer
that isn't how light works you fricking moron
That literally is how it works, mutt. Each colour has its own wavelength. If you’re light source is 100,000 light years away, you’re going to rely on infrared
no american is right that's not how light works
They shift the wavelengths. Say you have infrared light from 1000 to 1500 nm. You can divide the wavelength by 2.5 and get a range of 400 to 600 nm. Which is in the visible range.
The thing is it's kinda meaningless to talk about "real" colors. Our eyes would not even be able to see most of this shit because it's shifted so far into the infrared that it's outside the spectrum of visible light. And the rest is so dim that our eyes can't pick up enough light to make out details.
If you could actually go in space and observe the brightest stuff it would mostly look like a fuzzy red/white haze. You wouldn't ever be able to actually see such details as you can from telescopes.
The best way to get a good idea of this is to get a good pair of binoculars and go out on a very dark night and look for the Andromeda galaxy. It will appear as a very diffuse patch of white light.
All the colors you see from telescope images do correspond to certain wavelengths though, so they are internally consistent and that's all that matters.
>Each colour has its own wavelength
how do you think your brain perceives color, ivan
Everyone disagree with you but not me, i believe you.
This. My gf works at ESA and when she told me that my entire perception of the space agencies and space exploration just shattered.
your gf works at my wiener
You have never touched a woman
moron
why did chuds become anprim cavemen as of late?
>Russian flag.
Does this thread come from pol or int?
>Color
Wavelength*
of which only a tiny range can be perceived because our mortal cage's flawed design
Even birds can see more
this is only because human eyes are dogshit. you have to translate the incomprehensible radiations to something we can actually see. another animal with better eyes could probably just see the raw image in its totality
This image is fricking fake!
The photographer just slapped together different B/W photos from different filters and digitally manipulated it to add color!!
Fricking Photoshop we have no fricking idea if this man's coat should really be blue, brown, black or fricking green. It's all just lies to make LE PRETTY REDDIT PHOTO I fricking hate israelites.
>This image took $10,000,000,000 to create.
Don't ever forget that, americans, when you're paying 6 dollars a gallon, or when you can't pay for you medical bills, or when you have to pay for you college loan, or you you're 1 week away from being physically removed from your home because you can't pay the mortgage or rent
Engineers are the true heroes of science, the rest just uptakes a lot of money for either useless bullshit or to create more tools of enslavement to the State
this, it's all jsut illustrations made with photoshop or some shit
>the ASSUMPTION that one specific object is of that color
infrared doesn't have a "colour", because it isn't visible to the naked eye, you fricking moron
this guy is right, we should only put up "actual colour" cameras, with colours our actual *eyes* can see.
pic related
fake, these are all made in paint, space exploration doesn't exist
That light is coming from 600 million years after the Big Bang, it's very ancient
We have older images from older telescopes
I don't know too much space stuff but the wavelength is different too yeah?
Yes, the red wavelength travels longer, so in essence the Webb telescope can see further off because of its longer wavelength
looks fake & gay.
Here is a picture of what you can see by using the Hubble and this picture has been 400% upscaled for the PR purposes
In reality all they can see is a 700x400 pixel picture
You can't see anything. It's just sensors and computers that create a picture which is then adapted to be seen by our eyes.
The reds you see are probably infrared light, invisible to the naked eye.
If that’s the price it’ll cost for us to get in touch with aliens, then so be it.
i understand that they can take pictures of space, but what technology is the one that allows them to know what planets are made of? or those are all just assumptions.
Colour wavelengths and brightness on the image over a duration of time helps them understand gas compositions (if the colours shift). And I think brightness determines distance and other phenomena that happens that may distort light
>gas compositions
Earth based gas compositions
nothing stops some unknown chemicals to exist in the space so these are just assumptions based on what we know about Earth only
>nothing stops some unknown chemicals
It's not about "chemicals", it's about the elements and we do quite literally know what all the elements are.
>we do quite literally know what all the elements are
Elements of the Moon, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn and Earth (also a few comets and asteroids)
We dont know shit about what elements the space has to offer
an atom with 6 protons and 6 electrons is going to be the same here, in a different planet, and in a different galaxy
This is a theory that only works in our environment. A theory just like all planets and large space objects in general do have a core.
A theory is not a fact, especially when we use the scientific method
Russians are seriously so god damned stupid
2+2 is 4. That is a fact based on math as we know it
Planets having a core is a theory that is widely accepted by the scientists
but dude, what if the entire field of chemistry is invalid
I'm not saying they are wrong or invalid. All I'm saying is one thing can work on Earth and work differently or simply not work somewhere else.
They have theorised so much that they have to INVENT the dark matter because there was no other explanation for the objects moving differently other than an X fricking shit up when calculating things
This is the country that invented Lysenkoism and ended up starving to death because of it so it shouldn't be surprising.
How does someone from a country that discovered like half the periodic table not understand how elements work.
Russia-kun, what has happened?
>periodic table
israeli lies. there are only 4 atoms: fire atoms, water atoms, earth atoms, wood atoms
They had Mendeleev too
elements and chemicals are diffrent things
there are thousands of chemicals made out of carbon and just because there's detectable wavelenght specific to carbon doesnt mean whole planet is made out of diamond
yes, to be more clear: 4 basic atoms bond together to form elements and elements interact with each other differently thus creating different chemicals. for example fire and earth combined creates an element called carbon and this carbon can create coal or gem both have %50 chance
The dominant elements in space is hydrogen I believe.
>This image took $10,000,000,000 to create.
And it's worth every of the first 50 pennies.
nooo you can't invest in space research, that money could've been spent on corporate welfare instead
>you don't get it, we need pictures of objects that are X billion years of age that may already be gone because...because we do ok?
The problem with science is that is way too complex so morons like you don't understand it
i could have spent that money on so many prostitutes
the jwst deep field pic took 12 hours of exposure to capture, it took the hubble 2 week to do the same and with a fraction of the quality.
every scientific/academic institution in NA, EU, Japan & Aus is willing to suck dick to get access to it. they will be able to do more science in a few hours than they have in an entire century.
tell me about space
why does it make everyone seethe
webb mogged hubble fr
The brightest minds of IQfy have assembled ITT. Defund NASA, fund this thread.
space is scary
frick the cosmos, I hate space
polen can't into space
>"scientists" draw a picture in photoshop
>idiots lap it up thinking we live in a black soup with lightbulbs
>> idiots thinking we live in a black soup with lightbulbs
I mean, we do live in the void of black space with only the Suns/stars as our primary light source
You sound israeli
Back to Pakistan you moron
>NOOOO NOT MY HECKIN SCIENCERINO
I will stomp your skull into paste you brown moron
>I will stomp your skull into paste you brown moron
>this thread
Do you guys think maybe you've taken this
>OH MY GOD I HECKIN' LOVE SCIENCE
meme a bit too serious?
I enhanced them even more.
What do I win?
It's amazing
There's so much fricking space out there, just like you could go on an imaginary spacecraft travelling at the speed of light and yet you'd get nowhere, there'd still be so much FRICKING SPACE
And stars
Christ Almighty
woah.... space ...... .is //.... big ??????
Space is le big and it's le good but unironically
It's mostly empty, and anything/anyone of interest is too far away for us to get to anyway.
Aye but we can see the good bits
Yeah it's fricking huge man
I hardly ever think about it but it's just baffling how large the universe is, even our galaxy is unimaginably huge and yet when we see this image we see hundreds possibly a thousand galaxies in a tiny part of the night sky, just everywhere
So many fricking galaxies, so many stars
So much distance
Don't you ever think about it?
Space is fake. The Earth is the biggest thing out there, and don't you forget it.
>born in unimaginably large universe
>stuck on the same planet with brown people
Money well spent
Good. I'm going to save it and throw it into the trash.
>DUDE LOOK BLACKNESS WITH SOME LIGHTS THAT'S HECKIN EPIC BRO!!!!
>I FRICKING LOVE SCIENCE!!!
why do I care again?
Space doesn't have lemurs, giraffes, the Amazon rainforest, the Colosseum, the Pyramids of Giza, the Grand Canyon and kangaroos.
Space has boring, featureless rocks and balls of fire. Both of which I can find on Earth anyways.
FYI there are no aliens either.
>why do I care again?
>Space doesn't have lemurs, giraffes, the Amazon rainforest, the Colosseum, the Pyramids of Giza, the Grand Canyon and kangaroos.
>Space has boring, featureless rocks and balls of fire. Both of which I can find on Earth anyways.
>FYI there are no aliens either.
There are likely aliens in this photograph.
no there aren't you idiot
those are some of the earliest galaxies, life almost definitely did not yet have enough time to develop by then
You seem a little nervous, my friend. Is there anything you'd like to tell us?
Entire species with their own wars and hippies. Boomers and zoomers. Fricking shit ass pets who piss on everything.
If they're just like us but look like disgusting freakish creatures I don't want to know about it. Somewhere out there is a planet of sexy alien babes...
what if we are the ugly bastard race of aliens
You monkey bastards deserve genocide.
>you m-SLLLLLLLLLUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
huh?
I was thinking a few days ago about how bizarre it is that we just have hair growing on our face
there are likely aliens in your neighborhood
Here the high res image :
> https://stsci-opo.org/STScI-01G7JJADTH90FR98AKKJFKSS0B.png
I love science so much it's unreal
Suspicious anon, I'm not clicking on that link
me on the right
>an holofoil pokemon card template
damn
Producing pretty pictures to post on your wall is not the purpose of looking into space.
Do galaxies actually have different colours like that?
>tfw it stares back at you
Yes, obviously.
It depends on the preponderance of star types within it.
Stupid fricking homosexual janny.
10 billion for what? the telescope?
IQfy is too dumb for IQfy
>This image took $10,000,000,000 to create.
t. doesn't understand fixed and variable costs
take 10,000,000,000 images and they only cost $1 a pop.
Hell, by the time they take the second picture, the price will already have dropped in half!
Meanwhile, billions are starving on Earth. The scientific community will get the bullet too when the proletarian will overthrow fascism.
riight, the $1.7/year you had to pay is why billions are starving
moron
Why do so many people think that the purpose of the telescope was to take one picture then shut down?
You wouldn't understand.
It ran out of film already
Redirecting money from social media and entertainment companies via tax to stem grads is frickin great. I hope the next project costs triple.
Crazy how so many of those galaxies look like they're some kind of vortex, huh. It's almost as if space itself is a fluid and matter just gathers itself where there are pressure differentials, and not the other way round.
That's a fricking cat
>take 4 more images
>80% price drop
So where are the fricking planets? I can just download pictures like this from /wg/ I want to see real planets.
uhhh....
the universe is really fascinating
>hurr the squiggly line means its this chemical beacuse I say it is OK TRUST THE SCIENCE
NASA is a fricking JOKE