Quick question about history.
Why did Hawaiian sugar production fall?
It's obviously density but I want to hear the idiot economic explanation only his can provide.
Quick question about history. Why did Hawaiian sugar production fall?
Quick question about history.
Why did Hawaiian sugar production fall?
It's obviously density but I want to hear the idiot economic explanation only his can provide.
I'm guessing israelites.
Whatever the answer is, I doubt his will find it.
Whatever the answer is it can't possibly be economics because sugar price rose and demand didn't fall.
Diminishing value of cane sugar due to the rise of corn syrup as a sweetener, focus on more valuable Hawaiian crops like pineapple, and global trade making cane sugar from the third world cheaper are my guesses
>Diminishing value of cane sugar due to the rise of corn syrup as a sweetener,
It didn't diminish in value.
>focus on more valuable Hawaiian crops like pineapple,
This is wrong.
>and global trade making cane sugar from the third world cheaper are my guesses
It didn't.
frick off moron lol
Ok. So I take it his is too dumb to answer the question. Is that correct?
It's as correct as everything else you've written
Ok well the correct answer is topsoil depletion. Jidf will disagree as they are obviously mentally moronic.
pineapples are more valuable, they cannot be grown in many other locations and a pineapple requires a great deal of labor to bear a single fruit. Sugar has also only retained value because of the US government buying the surplus.
Sugar also swapped in the early 1900s to being produced massively by beet sugar, not sugarcane. This method is highly competitive and destabilizes the pure sugarcane market. IIRC about 50-60% of the sugar the US produces is beet sugar.
These aren't reasons sugar production would fall. Pineapple fell even more.
Youre welcome to keep trying.
moronic response.
Excellent work jidf.
Well done jidf.
this is correct, OP is jidf so he will disagree
Explain then.
How can I be jidf if there's no physical evidence for battle of Stalingrad?
Incredibly stupid reply.
This also was simialr to how West Africa went from being a palm oil hotspot to losing that niche to SEA since SEA palm oil plantation back then had proximity to other trade routes and colonies in Asia.
West Africa depleted its topsoil and desertified. Nigeria still has millions of acres of plantations but the yield fell. Competition is the moron explanation which is why his prefers it.
>West Africa depleted its topsoil and desertified
No to both.
>Nigeria still has millions of acres of plantations but the yield fell
No, Euro buyers simply weren't restricted to West Africa as source of palm since SEA was now opened up.
Your reply makes zero sense. Excellent work jidf.
But anon you are the jidf.
You need treatment for your schizophrenia.
I think you do sir.
It's true
Other nations providing it cheaper and in larger quantities. due to having larger populations that could harvest the same amount for while being payed less on more land to cultivate it on.
Silly explanations like the one you provided have already been given multiple times.
Hotel resorts are more profitable per square acre.
These sort of dumb replies have been given many times.
Have you considered that you're in fact the one who's wrong to an idiotic degree?
You're paid per reply right?