I apologize. I did not know how else to phrase it. I was in a thread the other day that pertained to the "super predator gorilla neanderthal" theory but I'm not entirely convinced. I've tried looking things up but most of the results boil down to "they could use tools" and "they interbred with humans" rather than anything more substantial such as their civilization (so to speak) and culture
As to rather or not to rather or not they looked like the upright gorilla super predator, or the more archetypal caveman is undetermined.
That image of the Neanderthal was popularized by Danny Vendramini a film maker, not an anthropologist. the image of the upright gorilla neanderthal was developed for the documentary "them and us" which, in my opinion, is more of a selling point than an actual theory.
based
humans manage to BTFO these betas at every level
4 years ago
Anonymous
if neanders existed today human women would still frick them because they'd be low inhib alphas that frick animalistacally just like dogs.
4 years ago
Anonymous
Maybe, but they would be relatively short compared to Humans.
4 years ago
Anonymous
Why?
Humans at the time of neanderthals were shorter than Neanderthals.
Neanderthal average height in the modern world would be 6'4" average.
Couple that with beastmode body morphology and robust features.
Human men would no longer exist in a sexual sense.
Woman want alphas
Human (African) males simply can not contest animalistic bestial lust Neanderthals provoke in foid loins.
They don't. Its Denisovan that increases their Neanderthal admixture. They have 1.5% actual Neanderthal and 1.2% Denisovan, Europeans are 1.9-2% Neanderthal 0% Denisovan.
Its also not East Asians.
Its in Papuans and Australoids.
In Papuans they have nearly 20% non-modern human DNA.
4 years ago
Anonymous
>In Papuans they have nearly 20% non-modern human DNA. >Starts remembering the IQ charts
Yeah everything checks out.
4 years ago
Anonymous
Also remembered this too
4 years ago
Anonymous
i think Varg went around saying that
4 years ago
Anonymous
Why do Asians have so much Neanderthal DNA? Most of their range was in Europe
4 years ago
Anonymous
They lived everywhere from the middle east to Europe, Spain and Asia. Last Neanderthal died in Belgium I think. Or Spain.
>redpill me on neanderthals.
neanderthals arent human. humans were made by God and imbued with the divine spark and neanderthals were the natural apex evolution of primates.
uncanny valley developed as a way to combat mongoloids who were absorbing people by throwing mongoloid wombs at them.
They went extinct because the ice age ended the mega fauna died out, lots of apex predators went extinct. Humans filled in a relatively warm and temperate Europe.
Its Denisovan. Neanderthals were close with Denisovans and mixed with them in asia and then they mixed with archaic Eurasians from Europe who spread into asia.
Alternatively, the same thing happened but with South Asians (Australoids) who populated Asia by taking Eurasian women and the Australoid genes were a vector for Neanderthal/Denisovan genes.
Denisovans were either an offshoot of proto-Neanderthals or an offshoot of proto-proto-Neanderthals.
They were closer to eachother than either was to humans.
Denisovans may have been larger though.
>The bones bore unmistakable signs of butchery: indentations where they were hammered open to expose the marrow within, cut marks left by knives used to tear the flesh away. They were scattered throughout the cave, and jumbled with the remains of horses and reindeer that had been similarly cut and bruised. When the scientists pieced the skeletons together, they formed five humans: four adults and a child.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2016/07/08/grisly-evidence-of-neanderthal-cannibalism-uncovered-in-a-belgian-cave/
We need to stop "redpill me on x" threads.
Facilitate interesting conversation, rather than asking for a spoon-fed info-dump.
What exactly do you want to know about them?
I apologize. I did not know how else to phrase it. I was in a thread the other day that pertained to the "super predator gorilla neanderthal" theory but I'm not entirely convinced. I've tried looking things up but most of the results boil down to "they could use tools" and "they interbred with humans" rather than anything more substantial such as their civilization (so to speak) and culture
As to rather or not to rather or not they looked like the upright gorilla super predator, or the more archetypal caveman is undetermined.
That image of the Neanderthal was popularized by Danny Vendramini a film maker, not an anthropologist. the image of the upright gorilla neanderthal was developed for the documentary "them and us" which, in my opinion, is more of a selling point than an actual theory.
how did their penises compare to human ones?
how many human women got raped by them and how many fricked them willingly?
homosexual sapiens have the biggest dicks, this is undisputed fact
based
humans manage to BTFO these betas at every level
if neanders existed today human women would still frick them because they'd be low inhib alphas that frick animalistacally just like dogs.
Maybe, but they would be relatively short compared to Humans.
Why?
Humans at the time of neanderthals were shorter than Neanderthals.
Neanderthal average height in the modern world would be 6'4" average.
Couple that with beastmode body morphology and robust features.
Human men would no longer exist in a sexual sense.
Woman want alphas
Human (African) males simply can not contest animalistic bestial lust Neanderthals provoke in foid loins.
you just know
Neanderthals = inspiration for hobbits?
Does this mean humans with more neanderthal admixture have smaller penises?
Asians have the highest amount of it, AFAIK.
Today LULZ taught me that Asian dick is a symptom of neanderthal admixture.
Is that image from auralnauts’ Star Wars dub?
WTF, this might be Mandela effect, but I could have sworn that Europeans had the most Neanderthal DNA
No worries, you're just misremembering.
I remember learning this back around 2014
Asians>Europeans>Africans
They don't. Its Denisovan that increases their Neanderthal admixture. They have 1.5% actual Neanderthal and 1.2% Denisovan, Europeans are 1.9-2% Neanderthal 0% Denisovan.
Its also not East Asians.
Its in Papuans and Australoids.
In Papuans they have nearly 20% non-modern human DNA.
>In Papuans they have nearly 20% non-modern human DNA.
>Starts remembering the IQ charts
Yeah everything checks out.
Also remembered this too
i think Varg went around saying that
Why do Asians have so much Neanderthal DNA? Most of their range was in Europe
They lived everywhere from the middle east to Europe, Spain and Asia. Last Neanderthal died in Belgium I think. Or Spain.
what if a modern human had coitus with a neanderthal and that resulted in an offspring, what would that offsping be?
>redpill me on neanderthals.
neanderthals arent human. humans were made by God and imbued with the divine spark and neanderthals were the natural apex evolution of primates.
Neandethals didn't exists, the bones ~~*they*~~ """""""""""""found"""""""""""""""""" are actually just deformed human bones
The uncanny valley is the result of your ancestors hunting those motherfrickers to extinction out of pure disgust and rage
uncanny valley developed as a way to combat mongoloids who were absorbing people by throwing mongoloid wombs at them.
They went extinct because the ice age ended the mega fauna died out, lots of apex predators went extinct. Humans filled in a relatively warm and temperate Europe.
Its Denisovan. Neanderthals were close with Denisovans and mixed with them in asia and then they mixed with archaic Eurasians from Europe who spread into asia.
Alternatively, the same thing happened but with South Asians (Australoids) who populated Asia by taking Eurasian women and the Australoid genes were a vector for Neanderthal/Denisovan genes.
Denisovans were either an offshoot of proto-Neanderthals or an offshoot of proto-proto-Neanderthals.
They were closer to eachother than either was to humans.
Denisovans may have been larger though.
Neanderthals had bigger craniums than modern humans.
They were hypermuscular cannibalistic beasts, the paleolithic equivalent of roid abusers.
>cannibalistic
Source? I’d like to read more
>The bones bore unmistakable signs of butchery: indentations where they were hammered open to expose the marrow within, cut marks left by knives used to tear the flesh away. They were scattered throughout the cave, and jumbled with the remains of horses and reindeer that had been similarly cut and bruised. When the scientists pieced the skeletons together, they formed five humans: four adults and a child.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2016/07/08/grisly-evidence-of-neanderthal-cannibalism-uncovered-in-a-belgian-cave/
Thanks