and the best part is it can be done entirely with free software, and the commies can't do anything because the greatness of the service is due to the wealth of its provider
the end point of communist ideas is always more centralized control for the upper class. if you just let small developers sell binaries and didn't try to steal them, we wouldn't have this. instead, you get free software being used to run the backends to rent-a-software.
You, because if everything in the world was GPL licensed you simply wouldn't be in any legal position where you could receive the source to the main program instead, just a client that doesn't do anything, or a website. The rich will always get theirs. The GPL just limits that to the ultra rich who can afford to run good SAAS operations.
In fact, the spread of the GPL, free software, and piracy is encouraging the ultra rich to do this and do it in a way that dominates the market, because >they can use GPL code and never release the source because the binary never leaves their computers >you can't steal their binaries
Not him but why not just release a GPLv4 forbidding people from even providing access to *usage* of the software without distributing the source code to those people
Real capitalism has already been tried. This is what it always becomes. Capitalism is a suicide cult, not in the sense that its followers commit mass suicide, but in the sense that it itself commits suicide, every single time.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>This is what it always becomes >Capitalism is a suicide cult >it itself commits suicide
socialists shoot capitalism -> "why would capitalism do this"
2 years ago
Anonymous
capitalism shot itself
state restrictions merely surgically removed the bullet before the lead poisoning spread too far, saved us from worse oligarchal socialism than we already live under
2 years ago
Anonymous
Capitalists always co-opt socialist ideas to cling on to power past the natural 200 year limit for a human civilization. We're essentially still living in the british empire.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>This is what it always becomes.
Nope this is socialism, particularly israeli, nepotistical socialism. This is what Communism always becomes you dumbfrick Marxist.
>socialism fails >socialism is bad >capitalism fails >socialism is bad
2 years ago
Anonymous
>capitalism is when public officials pick who can succeed
2 years ago
Anonymous
Public officials controlling the market didn't start making capitalism even worse until close to the turn of the century.
At first the regulations actually made capitalism slightly *less* awful. But they never lasted; capitalism always found ways around them.
The part where regulations started actively *worsening* capitalism was when capitalist lobbyists successfully bribed the government and gained government authority. Those capitalists then chose to kill their own ideology faster to fatten their own pockets. Killing capitalism in the name of capitalism.
Regulations or no, capitalism always, invariably, finds a way to kill itself in its own name, giving rise to oligarchal socialism where a few bigwigs hog almost everything and everyone else gets all the table scraps basically for free.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Capitalism is regularly defeated by the same capitalist society being defeated thus.
And I'm not talking about competition driving innovation.
[...]
Sneethe, cope, snope, rope, and dial eight, libtard.
Capitalism is based BECAUSE it degenerates into "muh oligarchal socialism."
You just don't understand that in this world there are the elect and the reprobate. When socialism starts as socialism you get the reprobate ruling over the elect. Starting with capitalism instead just sets it the right way around.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>unironic corporation worshiper on IQfy
many such cases sad
2 years ago
Anonymous
2 years ago
Anonymous
>capitalism fails
still waiting for it
2 years ago
Anonymous
Already happened, we're well into the oligarchal socialism phase. In fact we're approaching the end of it and just barely peeking into the uprising phase. What year did you blow in from? 1960?
2 years ago
Anonymous
>hydrocarbon scarcity is now classified as an idealogical failure
Mutt capitalism fails, and is forcibly revived, on a regular basis.
so what? capitalism is only defeated by other capitalism. if bugman capitalism beats mutt capitalism, capitalism still wins.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Capitalism is regularly defeated by the same capitalist society being defeated thus.
And I'm not talking about competition driving innovation.
Public officials controlling the market didn't start making capitalism even worse until close to the turn of the century.
At first the regulations actually made capitalism slightly *less* awful. But they never lasted; capitalism always found ways around them.
The part where regulations started actively *worsening* capitalism was when capitalist lobbyists successfully bribed the government and gained government authority. Those capitalists then chose to kill their own ideology faster to fatten their own pockets. Killing capitalism in the name of capitalism.
Regulations or no, capitalism always, invariably, finds a way to kill itself in its own name, giving rise to oligarchal socialism where a few bigwigs hog almost everything and everyone else gets all the table scraps basically for free.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>same capitalist society
false categorization. agrarians, pastoralists, and miners have always had rivaling economic interests within your arbritrary definition of society. government power is a derivative of economic power. successful revolts, uprisings and unionized labor have always relied on assistance from economic rivals, foreign or domestic. capitalism always wins.
2 years ago
Anonymous
meso-american civilizations look so comfy bros
2 years ago
Anonymous
>oxen >wheeled carts >meso-american
bro you are nearly as moronic as meso-americans
2 years ago
Anonymous
Mutt capitalism fails, and is forcibly revived, on a regular basis.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>This is what it always becomes.
Nope this is socialism, particularly israeli, nepotistical socialism. This is what Communism always becomes you dumbfrick Marxist.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>>This is what it always becomes. >Nope this is socialism
yes
like i said, this is what it always becomes
2 years ago
Anonymous
You read for fascism? That's what socialism always, always becomes. Either visiting communism first, or skipping it after heavy socialism.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>This is what it always becomes >Capitalism is a suicide cult >it itself commits suicide
socialists shoot capitalism -> "why would capitalism do this"
I lost a couple hundreds of braincell reading this post
"Capitalism" does not mean "free markets", nor does it even require a lack of state intervention to thrive (see: Singapore).
Mutt capitalism is bad simply because mutts are doing it.
>the end point of communist ideas is always more centralized control for the upper class.
It's also the end point for every other successful ideology in human history. C'est la vie. >if you just let small developers sell binaries and didn't try to steal them, we wouldn't have this.
If you don't want people to pirate your product, make something that isn't software. Idiot.
That's incorrect, unless your premise is anything that limits any free market is socialist. Fascism also limits the free market, is that socialism? Pandemics, are they socialism? Your problem is like with most zoomer pseudo-commies, you don't even know the definition of the words you use every day.
You, because if everything in the world was GPL licensed you simply wouldn't be in any legal position where you could receive the source to the main program instead, just a client that doesn't do anything, or a website. The rich will always get theirs. The GPL just limits that to the ultra rich who can afford to run good SAAS operations.
In fact, the spread of the GPL, free software, and piracy is encouraging the ultra rich to do this and do it in a way that dominates the market, because >they can use GPL code and never release the source because the binary never leaves their computers >you can't steal their binaries
app stores are more effective than drm, steve jobs knew this in the 80s
and salesforce or whoever it was that started SaaS instead of CDs foretold that it was coming anyway so they just decided to bet the farm on it first like netflix did.
the socialists are right in that socialism is inevitable
what they are wrong about is what socialism really is
"the workers" and "the people" are fluff terms that in practice mean "the government"
"owning nothing" is socialism, because "the workers" (the government) owns the means of production
to add on this, "the government" itself is a fluff term that really means "whichever organization has power"
the feudal system never truly ended, it only changed clothes
and the best part is it can be done entirely with free software, and the commies can't do anything because the greatness of the service is due to the wealth of its provider
the end point of communist ideas is always more centralized control for the upper class. if you just let small developers sell binaries and didn't try to steal them, we wouldn't have this. instead, you get free software being used to run the backends to rent-a-software.
Not him but why not just release a GPLv4 forbidding people from even providing access to *usage* of the software without distributing the source code to those people
That sounds like the AGPL
>the end point of communist ideas is always more centralized control for the upper class
Sounds more like capitalism today.
Communists cheer alongside blackrock what are you talking about?
They both promote diversity and hate white people
That's not capitalism, it's state controlled economy. The US hasn't had capitalism since the UCC was made into law.
Real capitalism has already been tried. This is what it always becomes. Capitalism is a suicide cult, not in the sense that its followers commit mass suicide, but in the sense that it itself commits suicide, every single time.
>This is what it always becomes
>Capitalism is a suicide cult
>it itself commits suicide
socialists shoot capitalism -> "why would capitalism do this"
capitalism shot itself
state restrictions merely surgically removed the bullet before the lead poisoning spread too far, saved us from worse oligarchal socialism than we already live under
Capitalists always co-opt socialist ideas to cling on to power past the natural 200 year limit for a human civilization. We're essentially still living in the british empire.
>socialism fails
>socialism is bad
>capitalism fails
>socialism is bad
>capitalism is when public officials pick who can succeed
Public officials controlling the market didn't start making capitalism even worse until close to the turn of the century.
At first the regulations actually made capitalism slightly *less* awful. But they never lasted; capitalism always found ways around them.
The part where regulations started actively *worsening* capitalism was when capitalist lobbyists successfully bribed the government and gained government authority. Those capitalists then chose to kill their own ideology faster to fatten their own pockets. Killing capitalism in the name of capitalism.
Regulations or no, capitalism always, invariably, finds a way to kill itself in its own name, giving rise to oligarchal socialism where a few bigwigs hog almost everything and everyone else gets all the table scraps basically for free.
Sneethe, cope, snope, rope, and dial eight, libtard.
Capitalism is based BECAUSE it degenerates into "muh oligarchal socialism."
You just don't understand that in this world there are the elect and the reprobate. When socialism starts as socialism you get the reprobate ruling over the elect. Starting with capitalism instead just sets it the right way around.
>unironic corporation worshiper on IQfy
many such cases sad
>capitalism fails
still waiting for it
Already happened, we're well into the oligarchal socialism phase. In fact we're approaching the end of it and just barely peeking into the uprising phase. What year did you blow in from? 1960?
>hydrocarbon scarcity is now classified as an idealogical failure
so what? capitalism is only defeated by other capitalism. if bugman capitalism beats mutt capitalism, capitalism still wins.
Capitalism is regularly defeated by the same capitalist society being defeated thus.
And I'm not talking about competition driving innovation.
>same capitalist society
false categorization. agrarians, pastoralists, and miners have always had rivaling economic interests within your arbritrary definition of society. government power is a derivative of economic power. successful revolts, uprisings and unionized labor have always relied on assistance from economic rivals, foreign or domestic. capitalism always wins.
meso-american civilizations look so comfy bros
>oxen
>wheeled carts
>meso-american
bro you are nearly as moronic as meso-americans
Mutt capitalism fails, and is forcibly revived, on a regular basis.
>This is what it always becomes.
Nope this is socialism, particularly israeli, nepotistical socialism. This is what Communism always becomes you dumbfrick Marxist.
>>This is what it always becomes.
>Nope this is socialism
yes
like i said, this is what it always becomes
You read for fascism? That's what socialism always, always becomes. Either visiting communism first, or skipping it after heavy socialism.
I lost a couple hundreds of braincell reading this post
Distributist Gang
"Capitalism" does not mean "free markets", nor does it even require a lack of state intervention to thrive (see: Singapore).
Mutt capitalism is bad simply because mutts are doing it.
Singapore is a fascist dictatorship.
So?
>the end point of communist ideas is always more centralized control for the upper class.
It's also the end point for every other successful ideology in human history. C'est la vie.
>if you just let small developers sell binaries and didn't try to steal them, we wouldn't have this.
If you don't want people to pirate your product, make something that isn't software. Idiot.
Patents and proprietary licenses are socialist because they limit the free market
That's incorrect, unless your premise is anything that limits any free market is socialist. Fascism also limits the free market, is that socialism? Pandemics, are they socialism? Your problem is like with most zoomer pseudo-commies, you don't even know the definition of the words you use every day.
>Fascism also limits the free market, is that socialism? Pandemics, are they socialism?
Yes and yes
what the frick are you rambling about? Who cares what you use free software for
You, because if everything in the world was GPL licensed you simply wouldn't be in any legal position where you could receive the source to the main program instead, just a client that doesn't do anything, or a website. The rich will always get theirs. The GPL just limits that to the ultra rich who can afford to run good SAAS operations.
In fact, the spread of the GPL, free software, and piracy is encouraging the ultra rich to do this and do it in a way that dominates the market, because
>they can use GPL code and never release the source because the binary never leaves their computers
>you can't steal their binaries
Alright homosexual so what’s your plan to stop people from giving away their free software? Spam more on IQfy?
License under the AGPL you fricking homosexuals
But then you can't parlay your side gig into an entry level israelitegle job!
app stores are more effective than drm, steve jobs knew this in the 80s
and salesforce or whoever it was that started SaaS instead of CDs foretold that it was coming anyway so they just decided to bet the farm on it first like netflix did.
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/why-affero-gpl.html.en
>the loonix gibmedats can't steal your software through a 24/7-manually-monitored virtual thin client
Then I just wont use it lmao
the socialists are right in that socialism is inevitable
what they are wrong about is what socialism really is
"the workers" and "the people" are fluff terms that in practice mean "the government"
"owning nothing" is socialism, because "the workers" (the government) owns the means of production
to add on this, "the government" itself is a fluff term that really means "whichever organization has power"
the feudal system never truly ended, it only changed clothes