>take artifact from looted temple >put it in museum where it is safe from theft >give artifact back to whatever shithole country it was taken from >it is immediately stolen or destroyed
The destruction some artifacts went through because some moronic nobleman from the 19th century thought himself an adventurer should be considered criminal. Why the frick have temple walls and ornaments from ancient cities been broken down and moved thousands of km away? If these rich frickers loved history that much, they should've invested in preservation of the archaeologic sites
>If these rich frickers loved history that much, they should've invested in preservation of the archaeologic sit
Maybe they really liked trophies. What you gonna do about it?
The locals were the ones who tore off, destroyed, broke, and otherwise neglected the priceless antiquities. If anything, it was those 19th century men of wealth who saved the artefacts. It was they who reconnected them with their past.
The thirdies didn't care and had no clue about their history. Whites are the only reason many of these artefacts are still around.
>The destruction some artifacts went through because some moronic nobleman from the 19th century thought himself an adventurer should be considered criminal.
nobles are superior and should not be punished
>taking pride for your ancestors accomplishments is bad >also this museum that owned this artifact for dozens of years needs to return it because muh ancestuhs
On one condition
If you're black, asian, or whatever and you live in a Western country, you get to take one item manufactured by people from your ethnicity as long as you relinquish any citizenship, official immigration permit, and/or refugee or asylum status and move back to the country of origin along with the artifact.
I'm 50/50 because displaying them is cool and educational, but also they don't really own them technically and artefacts were often just stolen by random morons in 1700 or 1800 or whatever
I understand it more for things like corpses/skeletons that were dug up, but this is also true
how do you even find and define which ones are stolen?
Of some king sold some artifact he didn't give a shit about to some Bongers for 10 muskets and a horse but know whatever government claims to represent the constitution of the same political or cultural entity wants it back who is right?
What about an artifact that was dug up during an excavation approved by whoever controlled the land at the time?
Only if the original owners are not a shithole
Otherwise it might get looted by terrorists or the AC catches fire and you lose everything
If any country has stuff from here i think they can keep it
t.Brazilian
They would just end in the black market and latter bought by some rich Americans, Chinese, Russian oligarchs and oilrich Arabs trying to impress some disinterested dumb bawd
No, most of them are returned to the third world countries they are originally from they will be destroyed or stolen, leaving them in the hands of civilised countries ensures they are protected and preserved for the benefit of all mankind, including the savages they orginally 'belonged' to
Buying things off the locals counts as stealing now? If I buy some shitty handmade bracelet from some peasant in a Spanish holiday resort will my decendents have to return it to Spain in 100 years?
If a rightful owner still exists yes, otherwise leave it into the hands of proper care.
>If a rightful owner still exists
that's the question, dolt
That should be reviewed on a case by case basis, i can only offer a general understanding.
>take artifact from looted temple
>put it in museum where it is safe from theft
>give artifact back to whatever shithole country it was taken from
>it is immediately stolen or destroyed
The destruction some artifacts went through because some moronic nobleman from the 19th century thought himself an adventurer should be considered criminal. Why the frick have temple walls and ornaments from ancient cities been broken down and moved thousands of km away? If these rich frickers loved history that much, they should've invested in preservation of the archaeologic sites
>If these rich frickers loved history that much, they should've invested in preservation of the archaeologic sit
Maybe they really liked trophies. What you gonna do about it?
b***h about it on the internet
And you can't fricking stop me
The locals were the ones who tore off, destroyed, broke, and otherwise neglected the priceless antiquities. If anything, it was those 19th century men of wealth who saved the artefacts. It was they who reconnected them with their past.
The thirdies didn't care and had no clue about their history. Whites are the only reason many of these artefacts are still around.
>The destruction some artifacts went through because some moronic nobleman from the 19th century thought himself an adventurer should be considered criminal.
nobles are superior and should not be punished
>most museums are concentrated in a wealthy liberal metropolis
Lmao, yeah, let’s take that shit back! All libgays deserve is modern shart.
>taking pride for your ancestors accomplishments is bad
>also this museum that owned this artifact for dozens of years needs to return it because muh ancestuhs
which one libtards
>ancestors
>what do you mean i cant larp and steal from you???
You ask this question like you don't know the answer already.
No, get fricked
On one condition
If you're black, asian, or whatever and you live in a Western country, you get to take one item manufactured by people from your ethnicity as long as you relinquish any citizenship, official immigration permit, and/or refugee or asylum status and move back to the country of origin along with the artifact.
No
locals can't take care of them. have you ever been to the old Egyptian museum in Cairo. Its friggin dilapidated
And white people can't either, they scrub marbles with metallic brushes
I'm 50/50 because displaying them is cool and educational, but also they don't really own them technically and artefacts were often just stolen by random morons in 1700 or 1800 or whatever
I understand it more for things like corpses/skeletons that were dug up, but this is also true
Watch the John Oliver video, he clearly explains it. Muesuems need to give those artifacts back to Africa. Now.
how do you even find and define which ones are stolen?
Of some king sold some artifact he didn't give a shit about to some Bongers for 10 muskets and a horse but know whatever government claims to represent the constitution of the same political or cultural entity wants it back who is right?
What about an artifact that was dug up during an excavation approved by whoever controlled the land at the time?
People of African descent are themselves a cultural heritage stolen from Africa that needs to be returned.
What are they gonna do about it, take them by force? No, then you gotta live with it.
Only if the original owners are not a shithole
Otherwise it might get looted by terrorists or the AC catches fire and you lose everything
If any country has stuff from here i think they can keep it
t.Brazilian
They would just end in the black market and latter bought by some rich Americans, Chinese, Russian oligarchs and oilrich Arabs trying to impress some disinterested dumb bawd
No, your fricked in the head if you think I'm risking to go all the way to a third world country to see artifacts of when they weren't cucked.
They aren’t stolen.
Alright then, who does this obelisk belong to?
The Romans. They built it in Egypt when they controlled it, then moved it to Rome later
Just share some of the profits. Better stolen than destroyed.
No, most of them are returned to the third world countries they are originally from they will be destroyed or stolen, leaving them in the hands of civilised countries ensures they are protected and preserved for the benefit of all mankind, including the savages they orginally 'belonged' to
Yes
Buying things off the locals counts as stealing now? If I buy some shitty handmade bracelet from some peasant in a Spanish holiday resort will my decendents have to return it to Spain in 100 years?