unfortunately it turns out that no amount of gene editing can ever make an adult human look more attractive. you need to gene-edit at the zygote stage or earlier.
sorry anon, you will never be handsome without working out and eating healthy
How are you gonna use CRISPR to make you attractive on your fully grown adult body moron? Your bones have already settled down quite irreversibly.
If anything, you need to use CRISPR on the egg and sperm cells, use IVF then plant that fertilised egg to your wife's vagene
1) gene expression mostly matteres during develoment, once you have developped, it's much harder or some times impossible to chage your physiology.
2) We don't really know which genes make you attractive, or even what exactly makes you attractive.
3) CRISPR is not very good at inserting or turning on genes or adjusting/changeing expression. It is good at truning off a gene.
If you really wanted to make yourselfe attarctive, get surgery. If you want attractive kids and really really want to do it via genetic engineering, you can eddit zygotes wit some adenoassociated or tansposon system, and select for success.
>another midwit thread that doesn't understand CRISPR
The amount of genetic modifications are limited. There is an extremely small amount of genetic data that can be introduced. These introduced polymorphisms themselves are of limited or no effect in adulthood. Stop watching pop-sci and star trek.
1) gene expression mostly matteres during develoment, once you have developped, it's much harder or some times impossible to chage your physiology.
2) We don't really know which genes make you attractive, or even what exactly makes you attractive.
3) CRISPR is not very good at inserting or turning on genes or adjusting/changeing expression. It is good at truning off a gene.
If you really wanted to make yourselfe attarctive, get surgery. If you want attractive kids and really really want to do it via genetic engineering, you can eddit zygotes wit some adenoassociated or tansposon system, and select for success.
Anon, falling into a woodchipper would make you look more attractive. CRISPR is less available than a lot of options, just manage your expectations and have sex with fat girls.
Is it the power of singularity that front edge tech is already obsolete to the moment common public hears about it? What front edge technology is achieving the task (that meme word) used to do?
OP, just a tough experiment.
If you take the DNA of your super smoking hot sister, and use "CRISPR" to "convert" your DNA int hers, how much time do you think it would take for you to become a clone of her?
>Remembers coronavirus vaccine debacle
Potentially unknown things that could frick you up real bad.
you die in the end anyway
>Remembers coronavirus vaccine debacle
Only literal morons opened a debate about gene modifications due to mRNA vaccines.
unfortunately it turns out that no amount of gene editing can ever make an adult human look more attractive. you need to gene-edit at the zygote stage or earlier.
sorry anon, you will never be handsome without working out and eating healthy
>no amount of gene editing can ever make an adult human look more attractive
Better genes should be able to provide better aging.
How are you gonna use CRISPR to make you attractive on your fully grown adult body moron? Your bones have already settled down quite irreversibly.
If anything, you need to use CRISPR on the egg and sperm cells, use IVF then plant that fertilised egg to your wife's vagene
>I've had the same skin from the day i was born
Do you know how biology works?
Looks is more than good skin
Not OP but nice clean answers.
Thank you
>another midwit thread that doesn't understand CRISPR
The amount of genetic modifications are limited. There is an extremely small amount of genetic data that can be introduced. These introduced polymorphisms themselves are of limited or no effect in adulthood. Stop watching pop-sci and star trek.
Just lose weight and get some exercise.
1) gene expression mostly matteres during develoment, once you have developped, it's much harder or some times impossible to chage your physiology.
2) We don't really know which genes make you attractive, or even what exactly makes you attractive.
3) CRISPR is not very good at inserting or turning on genes or adjusting/changeing expression. It is good at truning off a gene.
If you really wanted to make yourselfe attarctive, get surgery. If you want attractive kids and really really want to do it via genetic engineering, you can eddit zygotes wit some adenoassociated or tansposon system, and select for success.
I am
ignorance and poverty
Anon, falling into a woodchipper would make you look more attractive. CRISPR is less available than a lot of options, just manage your expectations and have sex with fat girls.
>using a bacterial gene checker to build yourself
Stop using meme words like CRISPR
Is it the power of singularity that front edge tech is already obsolete to the moment common public hears about it? What front edge technology is achieving the task (that meme word) used to do?
Lack of proper regeneration?
OP, just a tough experiment.
If you take the DNA of your super smoking hot sister, and use "CRISPR" to "convert" your DNA int hers, how much time do you think it would take for you to become a clone of her?
It sure as frick wont retroactively fix your bone structure.