The element of crime is just not solvable without violent and public beatings and executions. And even then, it may give you have a century of discontent but obedience; but will probably cause a riot and or rebellion.
 CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
 |
CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
People are too soft for that nowadays, unfortunately.
People would be just fine with it
Look how happy they are to see le unvaccinated die of covid/ le vaccinated die of 'unknown symptoms.'
We aren't soft at all. Just redirect public hatred towards criminals and people would be fine with it.
The death penalty has been abolished for over a century in some countries.
I’d be on board with Singapore style caning for petty offenses in lieu of jail time or fines. Especially for repeat offenders who aren’t getting the message
I've heard Singapore's reputation as a very safe place is pretty recent and that it had much seedier areas 40+ years ago.
So how did it become a safe place
I'm not entirely sure. The uniform application of rule of law, use of surveillance, very low tolerance for corruption and organized crime (especially drug and weapons trafficking), and relative lack of unemployment, poverty, and homelessness because of the city's unique economic and geographic situation probably played major roles.
I think yugoslavian UDBA based exile is the best thing ever.
You frick up your enemies, get free intel, have agents in foreign contries.
and they stay away from you.
Itt another moron wants to stop crime by killing people despite thousands of years of evidence that it doesn't work
Imagine being this far into lefty delusion.
You know the modern situation of crime and decay everywhere is absolutely abnormal, right? We know perfectly well how to run a clean and safe society.
>You know the modern situation of crime and decay everywhere is absolutely abnormal, right?
Actually things were way, WAY worse back then. Medieval Europe was basically modern Somalia tier in terms of crime.
Is that why people got executed for stealing chickens?
Killing people whose genetics pre-dispose them to criminal behaviour is indeed one way to create a safer society over time, provided that they are killed early enough in their lives to reduce the reproductive propagation of their genes relative to others.
>Killing people whose genetics pre-dispose them to criminal behaviour
Our understanding of genetics is still ass you fricking shitkid lmao. It was only until the 70's where people in medicine realized that women aren't simply just smaller men with fat on their chest. You think attaching crime policy on something so vague as "genetics" would actually ever work?
Yes, because it would be based on their own behaviour. Criminals would be steadily culled. People whose personalities/genetics make them crime-prone would be gradually reduced as a share of the overall population. 'Crime' is probably a multi-order effect arising from several different possible combinations of genes, all of those combinations can be placed under the umbrella of 'increased propensity toward crime.'
The most extreme sources don't even say crime is entirely genetic.
Who cares about 'entirely'? It's a matter of culling people whose genomes give rise to a propensity for crime. Propensities can be expressed in many different ways or settings, but the point is, once they ARE expressed, cull their carriers.
It's most likely a combination of hereditary and epigenetic factors, percolated through environmental and psychological influences, though it probably depends on the crime. Either way it's no excuse for genocide.
>it's genetics and environment
Really nailing it down there.
Any time, anon.
I never made that implication, how about you read my fricking post again moron.
Personally I think any violent crimes like rape, child molestation, assault, murder in cold blood, armed robbery etc need to get the dirty harry/judge dredd style of policing. Economic crimes like theft and crimes of passion are a different thing, but rapists and killers are bestial scum that can never be rehabilitated
WRONG. Financial crimes need public beatings for the simple fact that they weaken millions as opposed to victimizing one or a few. I think the idea that suited criminals should be treated nicer than ski-masked criminals is outdated.
Homogeneous country.
to bad for you the time when they did have shit like public hangings and beatings crime rate was much higher, because turns out its not actually the punishments that deter crime, but capable police forces, hell this pretty much happened across numerous states when the moment they got better policing abilities crime dropped which also led to a drop in excessive punishments
>to bad for you the time when they did have shit like public hangings and beatings crime rate was much higher,
When are you referring to?
Probably medieval Europe.
yes which is why states like Scandanavia are well known for their massive crime rates while Russia has a much smaller rate of crime and clearly not the exact opposite
Crime is punished with extreme violence in the 3rd world
This. Before the internet got so sanitized, there were lots of videos of thieves, rapists, drug pushers, etc getting humiliated or tortured and killed by mobs.