>the essence of being, the being of being, is be-ness
Profound
![]() CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
![]() DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
![]() CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
>the essence of being, the being of being, is be-ness
Profound
![]() CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
![]() DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
![]() CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
>benis
woah...
I see the light.
boy penis!
>interviewer asks Heidegger about atomic bomb
>Heideggger answers that it is fine, that he is actually scared of trannies
What is wrong with chuds?
he LITERALLY said that
I refuse to believe he said that.
>the self is the self's relationship to its own self's selfness
I hate philosophy so much bros
>morons on this board will defend this
daily reminder that we had perfectly good philosophy all throughout antiquity and the middle ages. modern philosophy was a mistake.
>dude is just defining something that is "actual" literally defining the "self-now"
NOOOO, I'M GOING INSANEEEE
?
What?
Sir, you should take your nonsense words and get off my board
Got ChatGPT to explain it to you.
It is true that Kierkegaard's definition of the self can be seen as an attempt to define the "self-now" or the self in the present moment.
Kierkegaard believed that the self is not a static or fixed entity, but rather a dynamic and constantly changing phenomenon that is constantly being defined and redefined in relation to its own essence and existence. In this sense, the self is something that is "actual" or real, but it is also something that is in a constant state of becoming.
Kierkegaard's emphasis on the present moment is also reflected in his philosophy of existentialism, which emphasizes the importance of individual experience and subjective interpretation in defining the self. For Kierkegaard, the self is not something that can be objectively defined or measured, but rather something that is subjectively experienced and lived.
Overall, Kierkegaard's definition of the self is a complex and multifaceted concept that reflects his broader philosophical concerns with faith, despair, and the individual search for meaning and purpose in life.
>faith, despair, and the individual search for meaning and purpose in life.
>emphasizes the importance of individual experience and subjective interpretation in defining the self
You don't see the irony?
>existentialism
Yes, but still, it is just a definition.
>individual experience and subjective interpretation
And yet he's a Christian.
Why would he relate the self to the self instead of the other?
Kierkegaard was parodying Hegel there.
>Kierkegaard
Biggest homosexual there's ever been.
a literate guy on IQfy??!!
I bet the German original sounds better english lol kill anglos behead anglos roundhousekick....etc...
Musashi and Heidegger are cut from the same cloth. Since ww2 though the warrior mentality has been purged from all culture.
Shut up!
Frick off israelite boy
>>the essence of being, the being of being, is be-ness
There is absolutely nothing wrong with this sentence.
Just become youself bro
That's an odd interpretation of Heidegger. Here is mine, which I think is more parsimonious:
>the essence of being, the being of being, is ing-ness.
"To understand being, we must look at the word itself. 'Being' consists of two parts: 'BEI' and 'NG'. What do they mean? No-one knows, and that's why being will forever remain a mystery."
— Jack Handy, sort of
Coffee also consists of two parts: 'CO' and 'FEE'.
Thanks for reminding me of “covfefe”
"Heidegger is impossible to translate, even into German."
>leads concept to complete abstraction without the ability to confirm anything because of transcendental nature of the pursuit for hundreds of pages
>refuses to elaborate
This sounds like Aristotle, especially some syncopated sentences like το ην ειναι του ειναι etc.
Just dasein yourself bro