>the essence of being, the being of being, is be-ness

>the essence of being, the being of being, is be-ness

Profound

CRIME Shirt $21.68

DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68

CRIME Shirt $21.68

  1. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    >benis
    woah...

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      I see the light.

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      boy penis!

  2. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    >interviewer asks Heidegger about atomic bomb
    >Heideggger answers that it is fine, that he is actually scared of trannies
    What is wrong with chuds?

  3. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    he LITERALLY said that

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      I refuse to believe he said that.

  4. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    >the self is the self's relationship to its own self's selfness

    I hate philosophy so much bros

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/yjmWTXD.jpg

      >the essence of being, the being of being, is be-ness

      Profound

      >morons on this board will defend this
      daily reminder that we had perfectly good philosophy all throughout antiquity and the middle ages. modern philosophy was a mistake.

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      >dude is just defining something that is "actual" literally defining the "self-now"
      NOOOO, I'M GOING INSANEEEE

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        ?
        What?
        Sir, you should take your nonsense words and get off my board

        • 12 months ago
          Anonymous

          Got ChatGPT to explain it to you.
          It is true that Kierkegaard's definition of the self can be seen as an attempt to define the "self-now" or the self in the present moment.

          Kierkegaard believed that the self is not a static or fixed entity, but rather a dynamic and constantly changing phenomenon that is constantly being defined and redefined in relation to its own essence and existence. In this sense, the self is something that is "actual" or real, but it is also something that is in a constant state of becoming.

          Kierkegaard's emphasis on the present moment is also reflected in his philosophy of existentialism, which emphasizes the importance of individual experience and subjective interpretation in defining the self. For Kierkegaard, the self is not something that can be objectively defined or measured, but rather something that is subjectively experienced and lived.

          Overall, Kierkegaard's definition of the self is a complex and multifaceted concept that reflects his broader philosophical concerns with faith, despair, and the individual search for meaning and purpose in life.

          • 12 months ago
            Anonymous

            >faith, despair, and the individual search for meaning and purpose in life.
            >emphasizes the importance of individual experience and subjective interpretation in defining the self

            You don't see the irony?

          • 12 months ago
            Anonymous

            >existentialism
            Yes, but still, it is just a definition.

          • 12 months ago
            Anonymous

            >faith, despair, and the individual search for meaning and purpose in life.
            >emphasizes the importance of individual experience and subjective interpretation in defining the self

            You don't see the irony?

            >individual experience and subjective interpretation

            And yet he's a Christian.

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      Why would he relate the self to the self instead of the other?

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      [...]
      >morons on this board will defend this
      daily reminder that we had perfectly good philosophy all throughout antiquity and the middle ages. modern philosophy was a mistake.

      >dude is just defining something that is "actual" literally defining the "self-now"
      NOOOO, I'M GOING INSANEEEE

      Why would he relate the self to the self instead of the other?

      Kierkegaard was parodying Hegel there.

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Kierkegaard
        Biggest homosexual there's ever been.

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        a literate guy on IQfy??!!

  5. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    I bet the German original sounds better english lol kill anglos behead anglos roundhousekick....etc...

  6. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    Musashi and Heidegger are cut from the same cloth. Since ww2 though the warrior mentality has been purged from all culture.

  7. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    Shut up!

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymous

      Frick off israelite boy

  8. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    >>the essence of being, the being of being, is be-ness
    There is absolutely nothing wrong with this sentence.

  9. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    Just become youself bro

  10. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    That's an odd interpretation of Heidegger. Here is mine, which I think is more parsimonious:
    >the essence of being, the being of being, is ing-ness.

    • 12 months ago
      Anonymouṡ

      "To understand being, we must look at the word itself. 'Being' consists of two parts: 'BEI' and 'NG'. What do they mean? No-one knows, and that's why being will forever remain a mystery."

      — Jack Handy, sort of

      • 12 months ago
        Anonymous

        Coffee also consists of two parts: 'CO' and 'FEE'.

        • 12 months ago
          Anonymous

          Thanks for reminding me of “covfefe”

  11. 12 months ago
    Anonymouṡ

    "Heidegger is impossible to translate, even into German."

  12. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    >leads concept to complete abstraction without the ability to confirm anything because of transcendental nature of the pursuit for hundreds of pages
    >refuses to elaborate

  13. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    This sounds like Aristotle, especially some syncopated sentences like το ην ειναι του ειναι etc.

  14. 12 months ago
    Anonymous

    Just dasein yourself bro

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *