This is how THEY looked like. Before the Bronze Age Bell Beaker people, before the Chalcolithic Steppe Pastoralists, before the Neolithic Early European Farmers, before the Mesolithic Western Hunter Gatherers, before the Mesolithic Pinarbasi Hunter Gatherers... there was the Paleolithic European Hunter Gatherer, the First White, who gave birth to His twin sons, and sworn enemies : the eternal Med and the eternal Nord.
 Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
 CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
They contributed nothing to modern european rapebabies
they are the essence, the inner core and the spirit itself of modern whites. only we have pehg DNA, this is the source of all our power.
WHGs were mesolithic people, vestonice and goyet 116 are paleolithic people, you illiterate Black person.
>people lived even before some shitskins so this means that the chance of them having depigmented is even higher
and nothing of value was lost
no they were "depigmented" - and brown eyed and brown haired - becuase their genetic makeup says so, moron. see:
i couldn't post the links because LULZ thinks it's spam
sources of OP:
search the peer reviewed papers
> The woman from the Dolní Věstonice 3 burial: a new view of the face using modern technologies
> Insights into Modern Human Prehistory Using Ancient Genomes
They weren't actually that dark.
Meds vs nords is only a thing on LULZ.
>source: snowtepkangz.blogbost.com
>Thuletide
KEK
Either way, western hunter gatherers were erased. RIP.
1. the steppe pastoralists were half WHG and half CHG.
2. this thread is not about WHGs but about a race 20.000 years older: the PALEOLITHIC EUROPEAN HUNTER GATHERER.
>half WHG and half CHG.
moron lmao, the were EHG
EHG = WHG + mongoloid
CHG (modern day armenoid) = EEF + mongoloid + Black person
YAMNAYA = EHG + CHG = WHG + EEF + mongoloid + Black person
EHG are 3/4 ANE and 1/4 WHG
look at the admixture chart you damn moron. EHG (or ANE, they are the same thing) is like 80% WHG (and 20% mixed dna from east asia, africa, etc)
t. artlet.
this was made 30,000 years ago, when art itself didn't exist in the world. subsaharan Black person masks are from 1850 AD, when europeans were making non euclidean geometries and boolean algebra.
and yet, the dolni vestonice venus has something gotthic with her.
that chart is very bad
ane is something like 25-30% whg and the rest ANE
ANE is very different from whg
>ane is something like 25-30% whg and the rest ANE
do you even realize that you wrote 2 contradictions in 1 sentence?
ane is the same thing as ehg, just with a little more chg admixture. ehg comes from whg and central asian dna (mongolian-like). just inform yourself on the basics before writing in these threads.
i meant, EHG is 25-30% whg and the rest ane
ehg doesn't have chg
>the rest ane
ane comes from whg, it didn't fall from the sky. how many time must i repeat this?
>ehg doesn't have chg
yes, indeed i wrote that ane has chg dna while ehg doesn't.
i made pic rel so that you make your head clear
>ane comes from whg
nope
whg is from 14000 years ago, ane is from 24000 years ago
ane doesn't have chg
that's a pretty inaccurate 2d pca, it isn't worth much
lmao all PCAs that don't fit your moronation are "inaccurate" or "2d". fricking moron.
and of course the mal'ta boy doesn't come from loschbour, that's not what i meant. what i meant is that mal'ta boy is a mutt between mongoloids and the stock which loschbour came from.
here you have a pca more focused on modern day populations, as you see, they can all be modeled as a mix of 3 extremes:
> south europeans
> Black folk
> mongoloids (han chinese)
>lmao all PCAs that don't fit your moronation are "inaccurate" or "2d"
because they are dude
stop posting, you literally don't know anything
they are peer reviewed studies of 2019 and 2020 you fricking handicapped sperg. they are accurate. you think they aren't because you lack the necessary mental elasticity to correct your wrong ideas.
the pcas are not wrong per se, but their were not meant to be used this way
they are not orientated in a way that shows the actual clines
what you just wrote means absolutely nothing. the PCAs are clear, the admixture charts are clear, the only unclear thing here is your head.
could be either a north european or a south european. she simply is the Ancestral White.
>what you just wrote means absolutely nothing. the PCAs are clear, the admixture charts are clear, the only unclear thing here is your head.
facepalm
there's nothing clear about that, ane aren't close to pajeets for example, that pca is badly orientated if you want to show where the ANE is
this is 101 stuff
ANE are indeed close to brahui. read the caption ffs:
> and to a greater degree ANE deviate from West Eurasians [that is WHG, scandi HG, EHG] in the direction of eastern non-African populations.
that is, brahui, kalash, lodhi, gurjati, mala, etc.
>ANE are indeed close to brahui
they aren't, they shift towards asians but more towards northern asia, like towards the udmurts
that pca doesn't show that, it's not orientated in a way that shows the relevant cline
it is not meant to show udmurts or modern siberians because they are themselves are relatively recent mixed population. the difference between central asians and south asians ( see
purple vs yellow) is as much irrelevant as that between armenians and iranians (red vs blue), or that between whg and ehg .
>. the difference between central asians and south asians ( see
lmao all PCAs that don't fit your moronation are "inaccurate" or "2d". fricking moron.
and of course the mal'ta boy doesn't come from loschbour, that's not what i meant. what i meant is that mal'ta boy is a mutt between mongoloids and the stock which loschbour came from.
here you have a pca more focused on modern day populations, as you see, they can all be modeled as a mix of 3 extremes:
> south europeans
> Black folk
> mongoloids (han chinese) purple vs yellow) is as much irrelevant as that between armenians and iranians (red vs blue
no it's really not, south asians and central asians are a lot more different from each other than iranians and armenians
again those pcas are 2d pcas and not orientated in a way that shows the actual clines
g25 runs the SEQUENCES (as well as the admixture), the PCA runs the whole genome (gene by gene). this is why g25 has multiple "unofficial" calculators.
why am i wasting my time with bricklayers, neets and dustmen with no scientific culture whatsoever?
you are so braindead it's unbelievable
do you even remotely understand you are putting the cart before the horse? projecting paleolithic populations onto modern variation of people living 20-30k years AFTERwards doesn't tell you what they are composed of, nor can you reduce the entirety of 50000 years of Eurasian variation into a single line
try to put the cart after the horse for once
this fricking board is really midwit+shitskin central
omg, not you again. fricking moron, learn what an allele is and then engage with me, moron. btw
is only modern populations. is it fake too? you goddamn idiot.
>ane comes from whg
6/10 bait you blew it
>CHG (modern day armenoid)
>calling anyone a moron
Lmao, LULZ is the midwit board of LULZg, plus if you knew anything about indo euroepan genetics and anthropology you would know that the CHG component in Yamnaya had NO ANATOLIAN FARMER ANCESTRY which modern Armenians Georgians etc have A LOT OF
1. chechens, georgians, nogai, armenians, etc are the same armenoid/churka cluster, and they are like 90-100% CHG and 10-0% EEF.
2. the CHG admixture itself tracks back to 7.000-5.000 BC and it descends from the pinarbasi HG (= EEF) , mutted with Black folk and mongoloids.
3. ymanaya were half churka and half WHG.
4. stop writing in caps like a moronic woman, moron.
Chechens come from Mesopotamian and aren't related at all to Armos.
>chechens, georgians, nogai, armenians, etc are the same armenoid/churka cluster, and they are like 90-100%
the most CHG you could find among them is 50%
>t. ESL can’t read a simple genetic clusters map
map clearly showed that armenoids are as distant from chechens Ingush, Karachays and other north Caucasians, as they are from Europeans, north Caucasians don’t cluster with south Caucasians at all in most cases
>mutted with Black folk and mongoloids.
Lol you are just fricking trolling at this point
>chechens, georgians, nogai, armenians, etc are the same armenoid/churka cluster, and they are like 90-100% CHG and 10-0% EEF.
This has to be one of the most moronic things I've read on this fricking site, have a nice day with barbed wire fricking moron
since you are an obvious moron i will show you as i would explain it to my 9 yo brother.
WHG = blue
CHG = green
YAMNAYA = 60% green + 40% blue
steppe pastoralists were EHG and CHG, not WHG
btw, this little masterpiece was buried with the woman, supposedly a shaman, in dolni vestonice.
Bros, I think they're trying to trick us...
Tariq is hilarious
Why is her jaw so small? Mew said that isn't right
jaw shape will grow perfect in the following millennia. please notice her anti-Black forehead. necessary to contain her 45.000 IQ brains.
>anti-Black
and anti-mongoloid of course
>should have checked their hirisplex
That doesn’t even accurate predict modern skin color.
Bell beaker were not bronze age people, stop calling them that, they used copper, maybe arsenic copper in some cases, but never or almost never tin bronze
looks like an angloid
>This woman’s skeleton was found buried under the scapula of a mammoth, with a fox pelt and red ochre
>red ochre
It's always this, no matter which continent you're in...