this photo was taken 3 days after the atomic bomb was dropped onto hiroshima. why do people still believe that nuclear bombs are real?
 Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
 UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
this photo was taken 3 days after the atomic bomb was dropped onto hiroshima. why do people still believe that nuclear bombs are real?
>why do people still believe that nuclear bombs are real?
>why do people still believe that the earth is round?
>why do people still believe that space is real?
>why do people still believe that the holocaust happened?
>why do people still believe that biden won?
>why do people still believe that vaccines are safe?
Meds.
get a tripcode so i can filter out discord trannies like you
>everyone who disagrees with me is a troony
Why are IQfynes so insular and delusional?
>i post the truth
>shills like you immediately derail the thread
i guess that proves that nukes are fake. thank you, mr. goldberg
What "truth" are you trying to prove when you are basically promoting the insane idea that nukes aren't real
you want to know insane? insane is that you refuse to believe irrefutable evidence when it is presented to you
>a picture of a trolley is irrefutable evidence that nukes aren't real
Okay
ay tone, how is there an electric trolley full of people driving around 3 days after a nuke landed here?
I'm sure a random homosexual on IQfy has the answer and not credible historians
>completely ignoring the fact
the israelite shouts in pain when the truth lies in reverse searching images
these poles have very little resistance to blast waves so they can survive while bigger structure have a far bigger vertical surface and get the full force
that one famous building was directly under the blast wave so it didn't experience a lot of shear stress
there were lots of those shrine entrance things that survived as well
>these poles have very little resistance to blast waves so they can survive nukes
It was an archaic atomic bomb, nowhere near the capabalities that were soon to be discovered. And the Nagasaki one was even weaker.
Reminder that the Tsar bomba test, was felt all over Finland, Sweden, Norway.
Peopel like you are just shill, promoting fake conspiracy theories to make legit cponspiracy theories to be forgotten and dropped, so when peopel liek me discuss legit conspiracy theories, we just get laughed at "aren't you the guys who believe there's no nukes and that earth if flat?"
ABsolutely disgusting the lot of you. I can see through your lies, and all of you bullshit just appears out fo nowhere, and all of a sudden is huge, in the cas eof flat earth, even with Hollywood celebreties defending it.
I've seen this on IQfy a couple of times recently. Thought it was some brand new bullshit, but apparently the 'nuclear truth' movement has been around for over a decade. Doesn't seem to get much traction, though.
I definitely remember browsing a forum for it sometime around 2008 or 2009, no idea what it was called.
They also really did not like when people mentioned all the nuclear explosions witnessed by ordinary Nevadans over the decades
"Obviously the US government was stockpiling huge mountains of TNT in the desert, setting them off, and sprinkling the ground with radioactive dust for miles and miles, just to pull one over on the gullible American people"
It's okay bud. You can call us homosexuals. You won't get written up for trying to blend in.
good thread
if you were wanting to have a giggle about a silly conspiracy that has no basis in reality, you're doing a really shitty job at it. You could've posted about sleep paralysis facesitters or meth immortality or solar plexus clown gliders
>no new posters in thread
nice try shlomo, pretending to be someone else is not going to change the fact of the matter
>EVERYONE WHO DISAGREES WITH ME IS ONE PERSON
You still haven't taken your meds
>the moon landing and round earth is real because we have photo evidence of it
ok
>your photo evidence of a nuked city being operational 3 days later is fake
sounds like you have a loose screw. have you remembered to take your medications?
>your photo evidence of a nuked city being operational 3 days later is fake
When the frick did I say this? Also there is clearly rubble in the background of the image
Explain how an image of a streetcar in Hiroshima is supposed to debunk the bombing? I reverse searched your image and it was taken in September in 1945. Hiroshima was nuked early into August of that year, not "3 days after" you lying homosexual schizo
https://www.life.com/history/hiroshima-and-nagasaki-photos-from-the-ruins/
>functioning electrical grid
>wooden poles standing
>tree still has leaves on
>zero birth defects from radiation
well golly, i guess my wood cabin is going to be fine when world war 3 starts
Probably because none of that shit was in the blast zone moron. And the "little boy" bomb is not like the frickin tsar bomba
well heres another photo near ground zero. little boy was 15 kilotons, but i guess another 5 KT would of been enough to take down the Peace Memorial Building, or whatever you're going to spew next
funny how the shill stops replying when presented with this. makes you think
Because why bother? Your mind has been made up since before you started this discussion
That building looks destroyed enough. Plus all the surrounding building are debris
https://muse.jhu.edu/article/224008
>On August 6, 1945, the building was 160 meters from the hypocenter of the atomic blast.
>The building retained its appearance because the bomb exploded right above it.
words from the utterly deranged
So you're telling me all the people inside that building were perfectly fine when the bomb went off? All of them survived without a scratch?
no moron, its clear the city was attacked. but really? pic rel wasnt able to take down a building that was near the explosion?
The point of a bomb is to kill people. Did the bomb kill people? Yes? Then it did its job. I don't see the deal? Why are you claiming it didn't exist when clearly it did.
>Why are you claiming it didn't exist when clearly it did.
what clearly existed? the firebombing of hiroshima? yes that happened. the nuclear bombing of hiroshima? no that did not happen
Do you have proof Hiroshima was firebombed? Because even Japanese reports only a single plane dropped a single bomb.
how would anyone see a single plane flying at 10km?
The bomb didn’t destroy the whole city like a lot of people think. Much of it was still intact and at a certain range they only got minor burns. It was far weaker than modern nukes. But it’s obviously that it was a nuke by the fact that a large number of people blinded by the flash continued to live in Hiroshima and Nagasaki long after the bombs, some of which are still alive today, and it’s the reason Japanese government put so much effort into designing stuff for blind people. Like you’ll see some old woman who was 8 or 9 years old at the time walking around blind with a cane and you just know what probably happened to her. It’s sad. Conventional bombs don’t do that
>. It was far weaker than modern nukes
It's also that people don't really understand the square-cube law. A 20 kiloton bomb will generally do a lot less damage than 20,000 one ton bombs scattered more widely, even though they possess the same explosive force. Nukes are massive overkill unless you have a huge hardened target or you're willing to go into the double digit megaton range where you can really wipe out significant portions of a city in one go.
And even then, you'd still probably need like a dozen W-59s (1 megaton bombs) to blow up a city the size of Moscow, and place them fairly precisely if you want to get a 20psi overpressure wave to cover the entire city.
It's all in this book bro. nuclear weapons are fake.