This is an Old documentary of Bob Lazar where he details the physics of the crafts he claimed to have worked on. Does any of the physics he talks about in the video hold any weight?
UFO Documentary | Bob Lazar | Space,Time And Gravity
This is an Old documentary of Bob Lazar where he details the physics of the crafts he claimed to have worked on. Does any of the physics he talks about in the video hold any weight?
I'll bump your thread even though I believe it belongs on /x/ but /x/ are full of morons so it probably wouldn't have went anywhere anyway.
I did one on /x/ as well and yeah your right, Reason I posted here as well is Bob gets pretty deep into a lecture on the physics of how the craft worked and wanted too see what actual people interested in science and physics had to say about it.
this is the /x/ thread in case your interested
>Posts cringe
why don't you post something instead of crying like a little b***h
Ayyy what he doin
>hold any weight?
Doesn't that kinda defeat the purpose?
How do you describe the physics of something witch has no evidence of its existence...
No, see Bluefire/Otherhand posts for a good writeup. https://www.otherhand.org/home-page/area-51-and-other-strange-places/bluefire-main/bluefire/the-bob-lazar-corner/
https://www.otherhand.org/home-page/area-51-and-other-strange-places/looking-at-the-bob-lazar-story-from-the-perspective-of-2018/
Here’s a starting point
>Lazar has been caught in numerous lies about his educational background, credentials that he has forged, and different home projects he’s worked on (particle accelerator capabilities, jet engine capabilities, hydrogen powered car)which establishes that he is not very trustworthy.
>Lazar had experience working on particle accelerators (most notably at Los Alamos while employed as a tech by Kirk Meyer), and continues to work on them in his spare time.
>Work on such particle accelerators would put him in a good position to apply to work on the ones they used at Area 51, which produced orbs of plasma in the sky by ionizing the air.
>after he realized his clearance was going to get revoked for his shady financial problems, he decided to bring a bunch of kooks into the desert and tell them that a proton beam test was actually a UFO flight.
>federal government threatens to prosecute him if he ever tells the truth about it just being a weapon test, so he has to keep the lie going indefinitely.
There are more interesting theories than Lazar related to UFOs and US black projects, if you’re interested, go on the /k/ archive and look up “proteus” and “bedlam” for some S-tier schizoposting.
Your question reminds me of Adam Egret asking Caitlin Jenner "what's the hardest sport you've never played?"
Here's Bob with his hydrogen car
>water waste product
What material did he use to machine his engine block from to get around corrosion?
Did you watch the video? He is running the engine on hydrogen.
>hydrogen
mixed with air to go bang.
HHO >> H2O
Hydrogen needs oxygen to go bang.
What?
Huh?
[A] when is hydrogen flammable?
[B] when is hydrogen explosive?
>pathological liar whos into nerdy technical shit
>makes up ufo story in typical liar pathological fashion
morons: HUURRR HES SMART AND MADE ROCKET CAR THEREFORE HE WORKED ON UFO
He didn't make a rocket car either.
He grew up next to a rocket scientist as a kid and this rocket scientist used to invite Lazar over as a kid and teach him stuff. The rocket engine he put in his car was a commercial engine made by the same rocket engineer he grew up living next to. It's still cool, but it is yet another aspect of this that is twisted and exaggerated to fit a narrative.
>Does any of the physics he talks about in the video hold any weight?
Nope. Go back to >>>/x/
I dunno about the image didn't looked up cause it looks like some japanese porn. But as people said yeah you can use turbojet engines to perform a vertical takeoff. They even did a personal jet thingy where you ride that thing and it levitates you but doing so is really unpractical so they abandoned the shit completely. Using aerodynamics to fly is much more feasible that's why they invented helicopter. Also you can't bend the gravity since it's not a force it's just the way space-time is caused by matter.
Lazar is a fraud and isn't taken seriously by any of the serious UFO researchers like Stanton Friedman, John Greenwalde jr, Jacques Vallee, etc. His whole story was cooked up as a marketing piece by George Knapp and John Lear.
>serious UFO researchers
Everyone leading the movement is a glowie, moron.
They're not leading anything. The most popular researchers are the charlatans like Greer.
You think Greer isn't a glowie? You're so naive.
You think everyone is a glowie. You probably check for glowies under your bed.
Fallacy; it is the burden of proof for the Agency to disprove each claim. Failure to provide evidence that someone was not contacted and/or harassed by members of the federal ecosystem is their job, or else DAO lawsuit filing is initiated.
>Stanton Friedman
>Jacques Vallee
>serious
LOL, Friedman believes anything on paper and Vallee is a schizo.
Lie 1:
>Bob said he identified the material as element 115, later when element 115 (moscovium) was discovered and had none of the properties, Bob changed his story saying it wasn't 115, but an isotope of it.
Lie 2:
>Bob said he knew the exact frequency of the gravity wave and he was not going to say it because he wanted to use it for commercial purposes. Years later science found out that gravity waves are not one specific frequency, but many of them and Bob has never mentioned any of this.
Lie 3:
>Bob said that the lights in the desert of the military base south of Area 51 were flights of the UFO. It wasn't, the lights were atmospheric plasma tests.
I remember watching a Joe Rogan with this guy. Every time Joe would ask something a bit more specific, he'd just go like oh man I have such a headache, I can't think right now. Guy's full of shit
You were already warned in
and are notified of this mistake:
>repetition
WTF this thread is getting more attention here then the one I made on
which is already dead and archived. A ufo bob lazar thread gets more attention on IQfy then on /x/ .fricking bizarre
>https://medium.com/@signalsintelligence/bob-lazar-theres-more-to-the-story-17829c2ff650
lazar's credibility all but gone after this article earlier this year
Lazar was a proven fraud in the early 90s.
It's just that UFOlogy is a low evidence non-scientific field. It's more akin to a social movement like conspiracy theories or a religion. People believe in it based on emotions and personal experiences. It's difficult to invalidate something like that. Myths like Lazar can be recycled and repacked over and over again. Lazar as reborn by Jeremy Corbell is very different to the 90s Lazer. Corbell dropped a lot of stuff about him and remade his image for a new generation. All the UFO oldgays or the proper UFO buffs who follow this subject know he's a fraud.