Demand that your politicians do something. All the changes you could possibly make in your life wouldn't compare to the reduction in emissions and pollution from improving environmental policy
i.e. from government force and guns.
that is what 'improving policy' means.
hey OP, it's cool; I'm a fascist too, but I prefer to focus my fascism on something that is actually bad, like homosexuals.
Unironically sterilize Indians, Chinese, Brazilians, Indonesians, assorted Africans and other insanely high growth and pollutant populations. Anything else, is chair shuffling on the titanic.
Climate change is not the issue. Pollution of the environment is, therefore as
proposed it is necessary to stop human population growth. Across Europe, Japan and the US this would have already happened naturally were it not for mass migration. For other developing nations with unnaturally high growth only a stringent one-child policy could save the planet.
nothing, because we don't need to
however, if you're still worried, you can start a movement to genocide all the non-white countries because that's where all the coal fired power plants are.
Basically all petroleum will eventually end up combusted one way or another. Even if Europe and the USA commits to reducing emissions, the undeveloped world will inevitably burn whatever we don't burn, and then some, while reaping the economic benefits from it. I've never heard a climate-nut argue that we could prevent China or India from burning fossil fuels, because deep down they all know it completely futile. It's all just a virtue signaling game.
You can't do anything. Climate change isn't something you can stop, it's a natural process, but one thing you can end is consumerism and technocratic capitalism that is absolutely pillaging and destroying the environment. All the pollution, all the deforestation, all the desertification will be the death of humans as it is the result of human overpopulation and savagery.
Through out the history climate change has merely killed off civilisation, flora and fauna (that adapted) survived just fine, this time too, while civilisation collapses, there will be humans who survive.
Not really, one is a UN NWO cause celebe that is promoted and pushed to enforce totalitarian control and allotting us spurious "carbon credits" otherwise known as rations, the other is practically observable. and fixable through simple regulation.
Right now, not a lot, unfortunately, barring technological breakthrough.
The best time to act was 40 years ago. Unfortunately, the likes of Exxon spent dozens upon dozens of millions (at 1980s values) of dollars running various agitprop campaigns (including against their own research departments) and bribing politicians, and the people opposing them were led by Al fricking Gore.
ironic answer: nukes, literal genocide and depopulation
unironic answer: slowly transform our energy sector to be carbon neutral some time in the middle of this century
Any country trying to outpace china or india in achieving carbon neutrality (so 2050) is dampening its own growth for little benefit to the environment though.
Implying organic gases are bad for the planet. Plants live off it you absolute reddit tool
Imagine being this moronic
>Imagine not engaging with arguments.
Just because you don't like it, doesn't make us wrong.
>Imagine being this moronic
>four >>s in a five response thred
If you think this many people are 'moronic', consider that the moron is posting from within your house
>organic gases
Demand that your politicians do something. All the changes you could possibly make in your life wouldn't compare to the reduction in emissions and pollution from improving environmental policy
i.e. from government force and guns.
that is what 'improving policy' means.
hey OP, it's cool; I'm a fascist too, but I prefer to focus my fascism on something that is actually bad, like homosexuals.
Unironically sterilize Indians, Chinese, Brazilians, Indonesians, assorted Africans and other insanely high growth and pollutant populations. Anything else, is chair shuffling on the titanic.
White brazilian here
You wont do shit b***h
I'm not talking about white Brazilians you silly frick, i'm talking about favella monkeys.
Climate change is not the issue. Pollution of the environment is, therefore as
proposed it is necessary to stop human population growth. Across Europe, Japan and the US this would have already happened naturally were it not for mass migration. For other developing nations with unnaturally high growth only a stringent one-child policy could save the planet.
nothing, because we don't need to
however, if you're still worried, you can start a movement to genocide all the non-white countries because that's where all the coal fired power plants are.
simply don't breathe the air lol, or maybe get accustom to temperature 5f more than you like.
Basically all petroleum will eventually end up combusted one way or another. Even if Europe and the USA commits to reducing emissions, the undeveloped world will inevitably burn whatever we don't burn, and then some, while reaping the economic benefits from it. I've never heard a climate-nut argue that we could prevent China or India from burning fossil fuels, because deep down they all know it completely futile. It's all just a virtue signaling game.
You can't do anything. Climate change isn't something you can stop, it's a natural process, but one thing you can end is consumerism and technocratic capitalism that is absolutely pillaging and destroying the environment. All the pollution, all the deforestation, all the desertification will be the death of humans as it is the result of human overpopulation and savagery.
Through out the history climate change has merely killed off civilisation, flora and fauna (that adapted) survived just fine, this time too, while civilisation collapses, there will be humans who survive.
Imagine thinking that you could change the weather
Stop listening to the talking science heads and the problem literally goes away.
Have every nation build LFTRs.
Nuke China
Ignore it and focus on fixing pollution and habitat degradation.
The solutions are the same
Not really, one is a UN NWO cause celebe that is promoted and pushed to enforce totalitarian control and allotting us spurious "carbon credits" otherwise known as rations, the other is practically observable. and fixable through simple regulation.
kill all glowBlack folk first
Reduce the population
finish what Hadrian didn't
Right now, not a lot, unfortunately, barring technological breakthrough.
The best time to act was 40 years ago. Unfortunately, the likes of Exxon spent dozens upon dozens of millions (at 1980s values) of dollars running various agitprop campaigns (including against their own research departments) and bribing politicians, and the people opposing them were led by Al fricking Gore.
ironic answer: nukes, literal genocide and depopulation
unironic answer: slowly transform our energy sector to be carbon neutral some time in the middle of this century
Any country trying to outpace china or india in achieving carbon neutrality (so 2050) is dampening its own growth for little benefit to the environment though.
Nuke china and you solve half the problem