when did the Ottomans stop being Asiatic Turks and assimilate into the Anatolian population?

when did the Ottomans stop being Asiatic Turks and assimilate into the Anatolian population?

Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14

UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68

Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    When they discovered the 'joy' of pedarasty.

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >asiatic
    They were never full asiatic
    Turkic by definitions and creation are hapas/eurasians
    By the time of late antiquity/early middle ages they already lost their mongoloid appearance and were like 10 % asian

    Anatolian turks have like only 10 % turkic DNA tho

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      central Asian and Siberian Turks are still visibly Asiatic or at least hapa looking and those are the areas where Turks are from ancestrally

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        That's not what happened Turkoid

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          What he said was close. makes more sense to said north or northeast asian

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Are you fricking blind?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            yes can you spoonfeed me what i should be seeing pretty please

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Look at the chart. It clearly shows the Anatolian component as being Caucasoid in the further breakdown with like 5% mongoloid.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            huh
            i was concerned about turkish origins
            gokturks are basicaly north asian which is what i said, but it looks like prototurks were from west asia.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Gokturks were Oxus culture people.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Gokturks were from Mongolia

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Geographically that's where they were located, not where they were from. Chart shows them as less than a quarter Asiatic.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            The shift to Hongshan Asiatic ancestry only occurs after the fall of the Uyghur Khaganate during the Kyrgyz period.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            The chart is an amateurish fabrication.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            probably which is why i now ask for sources on genetic spread

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            probably which is why i now ask for sources on genetic spread

            It's not a fabrication. Give me a moment to grab the source.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            https://leventagaoglu.blogspot.com/2020/07/the-gokturks-and-early-turkic-tribes.html

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            All I see is a roach completely misinterpreting data to cope with his J haplogroup and high BMAC-related DNA. I knew it.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            You're just confirming your own biases then. Cope.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            https://indo-european.eu/2020/03/r1b-rich-proto-indo-europeans-show-genetic-continuity-in-asia/#deadend

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            They're clustering far more closely with west Eurasians here than to east asians.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            https://indo-european.eu/2020/08/xiongnu-ancestry-connects-huns-avars-to-scytho-siberians/

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >BMAC
          >Turukkaeans
          >Turkic
          lmfao moron

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Those are next to BMAC, Oxus is clearly denoted as being "Proto-Turkic" you moronic homosexual

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            BMAC is known as the Oxus Civilization you massive brainlet

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            I never said otherwise. Bmac/Oxus.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        They got mongol'd who are full mongoloid
        Turks were already hapas so it was far easier to make them into full mongoloids

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          is Turkic/Mongolian ancestry also present in some Europeans? I'm white but I have slanted eyes and high cheekbones with those eye folds I forget the name of.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >They got mongol'd who are full mongoloid
          That would have been before they came to Anatolia in any case.

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >And as a corollary question
    How much of the modern Turkish identity (i.e. of nation Turkey specifically) is:
    Turkish (Ottoman and other)
    Arab
    Caucasian (esp. Armenian)
    Kurdish
    Byzantine
    Roman
    Ancient Greek/Hellenic
    Earlier Anatolian cultures, e.g. Hittite, Lydian, Galatian.

    Turkey/Anatolia is a major melting pot of ethnicities and cultures, but most of us in the West no little about it.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Turkey/Anatolia is a major melting pot of ethnicities and cultures
      Maybe during the ottomans but definitely not anymore after the assimilation process of Ataturk and his party and the peoples exchange with greece and armenian genocide. The only one who maybe still somewhat hold out are kurds but even they had to endure heavy forced assimilation.
      The ethnicities you mentioned don't really matter cause the culture only revolves around the shit made up by Ataturk during the creation of the republic and most of turks are either greek or greek anatolian with some balkan here and there.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Don't you gays ever get tried of constantly b***hing and crying and still nobody giving a frick? How many movies have the armenoids made on the "genocide"? Kek

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >give reasoning with why something is not the case anymore
          >immediately spregs out thinking everyone is armenian
          >welcome to nu/his/

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >give reasoning
            You're entire reasoning is based on some fake genocides of the early 20th century. Turkish culture was invented out of thin air in the 1920s, armenoid thing.

            FYI. Armenoid doesn't just mean Armenian

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Turkish culture
            No such thing before the ataturk republic and before the young turks

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            You think the Anatolians didn’t have their own “culture” despite the Ottoman Heir calling himself Turkish? Most citizens in the Ottoman Empire identified by their culture, Greek, bulgar, etc. None of them have in identified as “ottoman”

            You think ataturk came up with a random culture lol?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >You think ataturk came up with a random culture lol?
            yes

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      this

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        ty
        We need to add Persian to the list too (post above)

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    The Turcomans already started losing their ancestral Asiatic phenotype by the Late Middle Ages. We have sources that attest to this. When the Seljuks started moving into Anatolia, many were still roughly 50% Asiatic. When the Ottomans took power, this number had already shrunk down to 20%. Today Anatolian Turks are only 5 - 15% Asiatic.

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >when did the Ottomans stop being Asiatic Turks and assimilate into the Anatolian population?

    before they were actually even Ottoman

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Who cares? They are brown.

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    They never did really, if we look at the biggest influences on Turkish language and culture it's not Greek, rather it is Persian. The Turks basically became Persianised before the Ottomans were a thing but when they did come to power their court culture was thoroughly persianate in nature. There's a reason why the Ottomans referred to themselves as 'Shah' as much as they referred to themselves as 'Sultan'.

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >when did the Ottomans stop being Asiatic Turks

    They never were, the Ottomans were already localized Turks from their Seljuk & Oghuz forebears who arrived in Anatolia 3 centuries ago.

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    As the westernmost elements of the horde were vastly outnumbered by their subjects and preferred white mates.

    Things come full circle since the earliest Turkic script, Orkhan, is runic, sharing letters like the ophala with scandinavian and German runes. Asiatic Siberians came into the steppe, absorbed white culture, and like the hapa Attila, some ended up invading Europe and becoming barely-asiatic happas. Like Russians.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >sharing letters
      Germanic runes have no relations to the Old Turkic script.

      >white culture
      No such thing.

      >barely-asiatic happas. Like Russians
      No.

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Turkmen aren't actually uber asiatic people. You're probably thinking of Kazakh's and Kyrgyz rather than Turkmen, which are who Turks claim lineage from. They are Asiatic but they are not light skinned and the like.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Turks claim lineage from medieval Turkmens, not modern Turkmens. If modern Turkmens are visibly Asiatic, eventhough they mixed with Iranians, then their purer ancestors were uber Asiatic.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Turks claim lineage from medieval Turkmens, not modern Turkmens. If modern Turkmens are visibly Asiatic, eventhough they mixed with Iranians, then their purer ancestors were uber Asiatic.

      Probably painfully well known to both yous, but for anyone interested, the "men" in Turkmen means "like", not related to "men" in, say, Germanic languages.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      She cute as hell

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        You are either very generous, or very Turkic

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I don't think she looks bad but if I had to find a picture to describe the word 'ethnic' this would be it

  11. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    They rapebabied the iranians of khwarazm first and became turkmen

    then when they began settling anatolia in the late 1100s-1200s they started taking greek slave women and bred with them to become half anatolian greek half turkmen.

    basically every region they conquered they destroyed the major cities and razed the countryside and then took women as slaves to breed. and after a generation the population looked like 80% muslim mutt greek-turkmen and 20% anatolian greek

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Mutt's law in action

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        That American and Brazilan.

  12. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    It's literally called Turkmenistan. It's where Turks originally came from. BMAC.

  13. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Homeland of the Turks

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      No, even further east, towards Mongolia. Originally that is.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Technically you're right, they were still proto-Turks.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Moving even further back in time, I guess there would have been something like a TurkoMongol ethnicity speaking proto-TurkoMongol, giving rise to that language family.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            More than likely. They also adopted the XIongnu script, although I don't know if they had any writing before that.

  14. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    They were already mutted with Iranics before they got to Anatolia

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *