That wealth was held by the previous foreign elite. The average poo was no different than he is now, a disgustingly dirty subhuman shitting in the street and living in mudhut
Why has there been an influx of BJP propaganda on this board? We keep seeing the same memes over and over. OP is fake as
[...]
points out.
India was already under the rule of foreign conquerors when they arrived and when the Mughal Empire collapsed the British simply stepped in.
India was not on the cusp of an industrial revolution and was never "deindustrialized". This meme is based on a single industry, cotton, and a single event, British wooliers pushing for protectionism, which was limited to Britain and generally ignored. The British were in favor of unfettered free trade, they did not try to stop British entrepreneurs trying to start industry in India, neither did they try to stop Indian entrepreneurs like Tata.
There is also pic related which is absolute trash even by "grievance history" standards.
>$45 trillion >1757-1947
According to this we get an average annual GDP of $237 billion (45t/190), yet in reality their GDP in 1960 was $37 billion and would not reach $237 billion until 1986, a much more technologically advanced era.
How was the 45 trillion derived? The claim is made by a "Marxist economist." Her "estimate" is literally a nonsensical fabrication based on the idea that if India had 24% of global GDP through this period they'd be $45t richer. Her claim is if Britain hadn't conquered India, India would've magically kept up with the West in industrialization and economic growth and maintained its portion of the global GDP despite that figure being based almost entirely on having vast numbers of subsistence farmers. This is like claiming someone who stole $10 from my wallet actually $10 million because I could've used that money to start the next Amazon.
To anyone reasonable with 3 IQ points to rub together it is all patent nonsense, if they are trying to prove racism and colonialism wrong they are just embarrassing their cause. However that won't stop Indian nationalists and r*dditors from continuing to spout this.
>How was the 45 trillion derived? The claim is made by a "Marxist economist." Her "estimate" is literally a nonsensical fabrication based on the idea that if India had 24% of global GDP through this period they'd be $45t richer. Her claim is if Britain hadn't conquered India, India would've magically kept up with the West in industrialization and economic growth and maintained its portion of the global GDP
>India was already under the rule of foreign conquerors when they arrived and when the Mughal Empire collapsed the British simply stepped in.
Uh no whitoid. The Maratha Empire was on the rise and it was on the verge of defeating the Mughal. That's the reason of the collapse of the Mughals. Whitoid Anglicans came to the aid of their abrahamic Islamic brethren and prevented that from happening.
>MUH 45 TRILLION IN STOLEN WEALTH MUH DEINDUSTRIALIZATION >ALSO MUH MUGHALS SUCKED
gotta love pajeets. They know they're bullshitting because in their hearts they hate the Mughal era but they have spew bullshit like the 45 trillion in order to seek attention and soothe their inferiority complexes
>show me one (1) poster of Indian descent who has said this. I'll wait. The Mughals were extremely Indianized within only a few generations of ruling. They patronized an immense amount of Hindu scholarship and art, despite being Muslim. they allowed Indians to practice their own religion and whatnot, without dividing them or fabricating a race-based caste system.
how far did you have to reach in your ass for this?
Is their fault you >drink cow piss? >eat cow shit? >swimming in the Ganges with all its raw sewage and dead bodies? >Street shitting no toilets? >Extreme poverty? >Slums? >Gang rape culture? >Overpopulation? >Cousin marriage? >Oligopoly? >Victorian era railways that has fallen into disrepair? >Farmer suicides? >Bandhua Mazdoori >Caste system >Bride burning >Acid attacks >"Honour killings" >Sati
Find me literally any society that doesn’t have beggars, this homie is full of bullshit.
>Obviously India had plenty of beggars like every country in the world in the 1800's
Cope. India was the wealthiest place on earth in the and it gradually decreased as the snow Black folk of Europe arrived.
> a few thousand Europoors brought down the supposedly wealthiest country in the world which had hundreds of millions of people
That wealth was held by the previous foreign elite. The average poo was no different than he is now, a disgustingly dirty subhuman shitting in the street and living in mudhut
Cope.
why are there so many threads about india right now?
Aryans live rent free equally among subhumans across the world.
Why has there been an influx of BJP propaganda on this board? We keep seeing the same memes over and over. OP is fake as
points out.
India was already under the rule of foreign conquerors when they arrived and when the Mughal Empire collapsed the British simply stepped in.
India was not on the cusp of an industrial revolution and was never "deindustrialized". This meme is based on a single industry, cotton, and a single event, British wooliers pushing for protectionism, which was limited to Britain and generally ignored. The British were in favor of unfettered free trade, they did not try to stop British entrepreneurs trying to start industry in India, neither did they try to stop Indian entrepreneurs like Tata.
There is also pic related which is absolute trash even by "grievance history" standards.
>$45 trillion
>1757-1947
According to this we get an average annual GDP of $237 billion (45t/190), yet in reality their GDP in 1960 was $37 billion and would not reach $237 billion until 1986, a much more technologically advanced era.
How was the 45 trillion derived? The claim is made by a "Marxist economist." Her "estimate" is literally a nonsensical fabrication based on the idea that if India had 24% of global GDP through this period they'd be $45t richer. Her claim is if Britain hadn't conquered India, India would've magically kept up with the West in industrialization and economic growth and maintained its portion of the global GDP despite that figure being based almost entirely on having vast numbers of subsistence farmers. This is like claiming someone who stole $10 from my wallet actually $10 million because I could've used that money to start the next Amazon.
To anyone reasonable with 3 IQ points to rub together it is all patent nonsense, if they are trying to prove racism and colonialism wrong they are just embarrassing their cause. However that won't stop Indian nationalists and r*dditors from continuing to spout this.
Cope.
I "cope" by proving you wrong.
>How was the 45 trillion derived? The claim is made by a "Marxist economist." Her "estimate" is literally a nonsensical fabrication based on the idea that if India had 24% of global GDP through this period they'd be $45t richer. Her claim is if Britain hadn't conquered India, India would've magically kept up with the West in industrialization and economic growth and maintained its portion of the global GDP
Source?
>India was already under the rule of foreign conquerors when they arrived and when the Mughal Empire collapsed the British simply stepped in.
Uh no whitoid. The Maratha Empire was on the rise and it was on the verge of defeating the Mughal. That's the reason of the collapse of the Mughals. Whitoid Anglicans came to the aid of their abrahamic Islamic brethren and prevented that from happening.
>loses to fricking afghans
lmao
Nice goal post change.
Afghanistan was historically ruled by Hindu kings from 822-1026
not trying to glorify anything, just stating facts, I'm sorry I derailed your little BJP psyop
in fact, in a way, I'm helping you, now you know your arguments are bullshit you can come up with something better and more compelling
>MUH 45 TRILLION IN STOLEN WEALTH MUH DEINDUSTRIALIZATION
>ALSO MUH MUGHALS SUCKED
gotta love pajeets. They know they're bullshitting because in their hearts they hate the Mughal era but they have spew bullshit like the 45 trillion in order to seek attention and soothe their inferiority complexes
>show me one (1) poster of Indian descent who has said this. I'll wait. The Mughals were extremely Indianized within only a few generations of ruling. They patronized an immense amount of Hindu scholarship and art, despite being Muslim. they allowed Indians to practice their own religion and whatnot, without dividing them or fabricating a race-based caste system.
how far did you have to reach in your ass for this?
>Marathas, though poorly led by their Generals, had regular infantry and artillery that matched the level of that of the Europeans
Where did they get the tech from?
Lel. Still blaming the British,
Is their fault you
>drink cow piss?
>eat cow shit?
>swimming in the Ganges with all its raw sewage and dead bodies?
>Street shitting no toilets?
>Extreme poverty?
>Slums?
>Gang rape culture?
>Overpopulation?
>Cousin marriage?
>Oligopoly?
>Victorian era railways that has fallen into disrepair?
>Farmer suicides?
>Bandhua Mazdoori
>Caste system
>Bride burning
>Acid attacks
>"Honour killings"
>Sati
Yes this is all the Britishiters fault
All this tech and you still lost to the British? Just exposes how weak and tactically inferior Indian military were
>They signed a peace agreement and remained autonomous
Yeah thats called lsoing
quote in the OP is fake btw. i'm also psure john green used it in one of his videos and blanked me when i emailed him about it lel
You're a homosexual and a liar. Why would people respond to your bullshit
hi john
when's the new series about the heckin wholesome mongolerinos coming?
If India is so great why can't it figure out toilets?
This dude is a liar and thus OP is a poo cum chugger
Nice illustration from 1891/1923. You sure proved OP wrong.
The British invented India. Just like they invented 90% of everything else.