Would you actually have a nice day over some girl you met couple days ago?
 It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
 Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
Would you actually kill yourself over some girl you met couple days ago?
Would you actually have a nice day over some girl you met couple days ago?
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
Yeah
Sure, I'd kill myself even without a girl.
I have a spiritual kinship with these two posters.
If she looked like Olivia Hussey, I’d think about it.
>Would you actually have a nice day over some girl you met couple days ago?
You got to understand it was intense, OP. Also, foolish teenagers will be foolish tennagers.
Plus, wasn't the point of The Bard that Romeo was dumb and volatile?
And Romeo only killed himself after JULIET killed herself without knowing.
If you had read the play you would know that Romeo falls in love often and falls in love hard. Before he met Juliet he was lamenting over getting rejected by Rosaline
He is a young man completely absorbed in a Petrarchan life style that sees him flying from one fancy to the next. The question of the play is if he is right to obey his heart and follow love
Wtf Romeo is literqlly me but the truth is I discovered that I only care about hunting. I got the most beautiful girlfriend I could get and I got bored after two weeks.
To further develop this line of thought, I've started to consider Romeo a sort of Petrarchan precursor to Hamlet. Through his actions, he brings about great pain and sorrow to his kin and kith, all in pursuit of his ultimate goal, love, or at least the idea of love. Whether or not Romeo actually loved Juliet or if it was a passing thing like his other experiences with this feeling is something the play brings up and questions. Even the topic of Juliet's age plays into this. She's a young and innocent girl. Romeo is a man older than her, more experienced in these matters. But they move their relationship along so blindingly fast, even after Romeo had been rejected by Rosalind mere days earlier. There's also the topic of the Friar. While he is Romeo's ally and helps him be with Juliet, he does advise to love moderately and to not be consumed by the fires of passion
>These violent delights have violent ends
>And in their triumph die, like fire and powder,
>Which, as they kiss, consume. The sweetest honey
>Is loathsome in his own deliciousness
>And in the taste confounds the appetite.
>Therefore love moderately. Long love doth so.
>Too swift arrives as tardy as too slow.
Whether this 'anti-Petrarchan rubbish', as I heard another anon refer to it as, is right, is once again up to the interpretation of the reader. Romeo didn't listen to the advice and we saw how that turned out, but once again, was he right to do so? Is Romeo a violent, manipulative, and vapid young man, who pulled poor young Juliet into his madness, promising her tenderness and freedom, bringing ruin upon both their houses in the process? Or did he love true and was the world too cruel to accept people like him and Juliet? Would he have grown bored of his Juliet once he had her and moved on to another woman, like what happened with Rosalind, or would he have stayed by her side as her husband? Like Hamlet, only those in the audience can say for sure. There exists enough room in the play to argue for and against Romeo, after all
It really is such a well crafted play when you start looking at the thematic aspects of it. It's an impressive work for such a young playwright at the time
When I was younger and never dated before, yeah.
No I wouldn't sacrifice myself even to save my family tbh
Dangerously ased
>star-crossed
You wouldn't have a choice
i finished reading this play for the second time yesterday, and i gotta say the last scene is really well done. everything comes together. lots of people have criticisms about the story and the age and other bullshit but it's just undeniably really good. pacing is top. no bullshit within. its love at first sight and they want eachother so bad that theyre willing to die if they are denied it. stories dont need character progression or breakthroughs to be good. mercutio is the ONLY reasonable homie in the play and hes the first to die. the whole point is people stuck in their ways causing harm to themselves and the world around them. the play is extremely reactionary and dramatic. shakespeare is based as frick for making this top tier slop. solid 4/5 for me.
Op doesn't understand the mystical nature of love.
>Op doesn't understand the ape nature of love.
Ftfy
If she smelt nice yeah maybe
Yeah maybe
oh yeah, don't ask me how I know, just take my word for it.
For a hot piece of dicky? Maybe.
No, but the idea of it is romantic.
sort of an awkward position init, if she killed herself since she thought I was dead I s'pose I'd have to
I dont need a girl to make me suicidal. It sure does help though.
What do crossed stars look like????
No, I’m not a simp
yeah probably
>This caused boomers to jerk off furiously in movie theaters
Lmao
This made every 16 year old English student cum in class
>how can I jerk off to this? she's white and under 300 lbs
>she doesn't even have a penis!
zoomer moment
But she's beautiful, anon. I never saw the movie, but lookswise she's a fair Juliet.
No, but a lot of simp cuck beta numale white knight homosexuals would.
no way of knowing until it happens
I would pretend to do it so I’d look cool, but conveniently get saved by another onlooking BABE right before I manage it. Women are so vain and narcissistic, it’d be easy. “Oh nooo haha I didn’t have a reason to live, but now YOU’RE my reason.”
meanie