If you could remove one author from history, who would it be?
Feel free to give your reasons, or don't, idc.
 |
 DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
|
You could erase one author from history
If you could remove one author from history, who would it be?
Feel free to give your reasons, or don't, idc.
|
DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
|
Hartmann or Schopenhauer, but Schopenhauer would have been left in deserved obscurity if not for Hartmann. Then the world, and writers and artists, would have been spared the afflictions of pessimism and Nietzsche.
Not famous enough to criticize. He didn’t have the impact you would imagine and no one discusses him here. That being said my choice is Mark Fisher although hating him gives me purpose so it’s a double edged sword.
Hartmann is the only reason the world knows of Schopenhauer's existence, he single handedly popularised pessimism in fin de siecle Europe.
Aside, no one really discusses him anywhere
He’s grossly misunderstood by liberals. He’s proto-Fascist
Christcuck detected
if you dont believe in any sort of higher power or purpose then why even go on living. i dont understand pessimists/nihilists at all, like lets think for a minute, do you really think that this infinitely complex existence just happened from nothing? nothing in this world is born from nothing, it all has an origin point/creator. and lets say for a minute that there isnt any sort of creator, higher purpose or God, why the frick would you even bother posting here? why would you get out of bed when you have the singular belief that "nothing matters"? grow up
> if you dont believe in any sort of higher power or purpose then why even go on living.
Lmao if I was 2,000 years older than you you’d call me a higher power and accept my word as authority. Live for yourself for a moment you sucked up wretch. Life will not get better after death, it will cease.
Okay let’s test that out
not same anon, but its a double-edged sword, I don' think that erasing Von Hartmann from the discourse would matter much at all, he's a "literally who" among even the more famous proponents of German Pessimism, Schopenhauer and even Mainlander get discussed in greater detail, despite the latter not having an English translation (though I hear its in the works), he's just known as the guy who thinks the entire universe should be destroyed. Having said that, figures like Jung and Steiner wouldn't exist, two figures I admire for different, albeit inconsequential reasons, either by something they practiced in their application or held within themselves only to be put to print. But otherwise I generally agree with (You) and not the anon to which you're responding.
James Joyce, the psueds in the world would decrease tenfold
along with the entirety of irish culture
They still have Riverdance.
>t. 'Anglo'-american
None. Censorship is moronic and wanting it is a sign that one can’t argue against it adequately
Yeah this. People have a right to think even if I hate their conclusions.
Reddit drivel. Bad arguments spread quickly like poisonous air. You’re weak, your lineage is weak, and I will suppress homosexualry.
>and I will suppress homosexualry.
You will do no such thing, sweetie :*
Ok redditor omg go back redditor you're such a redditor you guys he probably uses this website you guys. And you're trying to act like you don't propagate bad arguments. Allow the free flow of info, it allows you to better filter out the morons who use bad arguments
I see you were deeply struck by the reddit star of David.
Everytime…
Your ass is deeply struck by wieners on the reg
You morons literally cry about Reddit plus the rest of the world and censorship, now you are for censorship? Kek
I don’t give a frick about equal rights you c**t. I want to rule my inferiors.
>my ideas good and should be promoted, their ideas bad and should be censored
Literal grug tier reasoning and hypocrisy
That’s not hypocrisy I’m saying I want literal inequality.
Then don’t b***h about censorship
When the frick did I b***h about censorship you stupid homosexual? I made this thread. God you’re illiterate.
A israelite that strikes out and cries at the same time. No one cares about hypocrisy queer.
>IQfyner
>superior
homie you have no inferiors who are you trying to kid
i would remove albert camus for his status quo-oid philosophy
I would dash baby Plato against a wall with absolutely no remorse.
Mohammed
Even if these two were erased something equally unfounded and ridiculous would just take its place.
>unfounded and ridiculous
Kek, Fedora-tipper you have no idea what you are talking about when it comes to the rise and perseverance of religions.
Solid choiice, but the cult of rome would have found another stooge to subjugate and eliminate the competing christian sects.
This guy
There is no evidence he even existed but agreed.
>The Pentateuch is evidence!
No it’s not, that is like saying comic books are evidence of Spiderman.
True, Plato's works aren't proof Socrates and Plato existed. No history book is proof that any historical figure existed too. Your post is not proof you exist. Good thing we put all that silly thinking behind us.
I didn’t say proof, I said evidence. Plato’s works are evidence that Socrates existed because other writes like Xenophon also reference Socrates and neither are written with theological motivations. It would be more unusual for Socrates to be a fake figure than just a real person both are writing about.
The Pentateuch is explicitly religious or mythological and Moses is only attested to in the Pentateuch with no other eyewitnesses.
Regardless if Plato or Socrates are real, it makes no impact on their real/fictional words and ideas, the stories of the Torah/Bible absolutely do rely upon Moses being a literal person.
You say this as if Matthew Mark Luke and John were all mutuals.
The truth is the life of Jesus was real and that these four separate authors probably embellished the same prophecies (and different ones for that matter) that’s why they differed.
Btw before you go on remember that there’s no longer any first hand accounts of Alexander the Great (look it up they’re lost and we have summaries and commentaries on the first hand accounts ONLY) and that Jesus was none the less a commoner, and as such was not written about by most men, nor had inscriptions during his lifetime nor towns named after him.
Did I fricking say anything about Jesus dumbass? I was referring to Moses.
Proof and evidence are synonymous
Talk to me about those horns. Was he a literal demon? I've heard it said.
Those are moth feelers. He was a man-moth.
Nietzsche.
Shakespeare
I want to say Rousseau but I won't, they deserved him.
The guy who invented Oreos. I'm not saying his name.
None of I could. If I have to it would be me, even if an author does shit work or has the "wrong" opinion on things, they still deserve to be heard.
Plato
This World Of Perfect Forms shit has to go and stay go.
Karl Marx
I agree with this, Marx ruined the notion of communism, which predated him by centuries - he was probably a plant (see img. attached).
You're an author of this post, and I choose you, OP.
>reasons
So that you never create this shit thread.
Underage alert
ABRAHAM
Captcha magyar
Hmmmm. De Lilo
neil degrasse tyson
Hegel or Homer
>Google best authors in history
>Erase : All
>Google greatest mathematicians, scientists, composers, artists, movie directors, playwrights
>Erase all
Does he count? If so he is DONE. FINISHED.
it's a close call between Saint Thomas of Water and Saint Augustine of Hippopotamus,both are pernicious and preposterous and both attract young incels to their petticoats like mothers cookies.
That said, if it were not them it would be some other pairing of insignificant do-nothings who wore a womans dress and espoused lazy platitudes. Though Augustines lazy platitudes are the worser of the two; the more galling in israeli chutzpah, so I would have to say we go back in time and beat Augustine to death.
when we heading out
and where do you find these young incels clinging to their petticoats? in your mind?
he was, he was related to the Rothschild dynasty. I would even wager he was put in the public spotlight to make sure that communism, and socialism by extension, would be forever tarred and feathered by mere association.
>and where do you find these young incels clinging to their petticoats? in your mind?
in fact I said,
>>both are pernicious and preposterous and both attract young incels to their petticoats like mothers cookies.
>he was
indeed i suspect as much. It is of fortune, therethence, that Saint Stalin arose and averted this blasphemy from occurring; the deep tragedy being only his betrayal by his generals as they cowered around his tomb, half-praying half-hoping he would rise from the dead and lead them eternal.
non nobis domine non nobis
that beautiful face that wept