Zoomer here, can anyone explain to me the phenomenon of Diana? I just don't get the appeal, why was she that big of a deal?
Zoomer here, can anyone explain to me the phenomenon of Diana?
Zoomer here, can anyone explain to me the phenomenon of Diana? I just don't get the appeal, why was she that big of a deal?
she cute
She look weird and she is not that cute
Very average
6,75 at best
Stop watching porn.
I dont watch porn
I see women way cuter than her on average
No you fricking don’t
She was average at best dumb bongoids, people saying she was pretty have probably never interacted with any other woman
I can't, I'm 2 weak
demented
go meet women pls
The only reason you think she looks bad is because
1) You watch too much porn
2) She is a product of 80s and 90s fashion.
Her basic features are all excellent. If she were to style herself in 21st century fashions she would be a 10/10.
I didnt say she look bad you moronic homosexual
I said she look average/above average
>watch porn
I dont you projectionist
fpbp
Muslim wiener only
millions if not billions of women wanted to be her
she was a prostitute and a roastie, and royal family didn't want to be associated with her, so they had her killed
Wouldn't have been anything out of the ordinary considering we have proof that Richard III's bloodline died out long ago.
>Genealogical information showed that all five living male-line relatives of Richard III were descended from Henry Somerset, the 5th Duke of Beaufort and the Y chromosome data for four out of the five male-line relatives showed a match consistent with them being related as expected. However, one of the five had a very different Y chromosome type indicating that a false-paternity had occurred within the last few generations. The Y chromosome type of the Skeleton 1 did not match any of the living male-line relatives showing that a false-paternity event (or events) had also occurred somewhere in the 19 generations between Richard III and Henry Somerset, 5th Duke of Beaufort. This was not a particularly surprising result. Work by Turi King and others has shown that historical rates of false-paternity are around 1-2% per generation.
https://le.ac.uk/richard-iii/identification/genetics/dna-results
did Charles have anything to do with that?
Reminds me
that shitpost only got two (You)s and you still decided to screencap it? You were the one who made it, weren't you?
Mass media was a lot more influential back then
+Girls want to be a princess
>back then
Yes
you have no idea how there was more of a narrative on the 3 letter networks you could not escape
Cable news opened it up a tiny bit, the internet gives you schizophrenia if you try to take in all of them
so most just go their preferred echo chamber
>back then
there was just one echo chamber
sad pretty and people sympathized because she was the odd one out in the royal family. basically just the common phenomen of identifying with the “ugly duckling”
it's easy: women want to be treated, by their orbiters, like a princess during the day and to be fricked, by their (chad only) orbiters, like a prostitute during the night.
Gen X here, I never understood it either.
People like celebrities, I guess, and the media covered the heck out of Diana's every move.
That was basically soap opera becoming real. A woman living in the world of wealthy, doing Things (supposedly) and being beautiful.
There were so many people who did much more and were much more beautiful, yet white man's bias won over (I'm neither a nig nor liberal btw)
she is strong proof that pussy privilege is real, that's for sure.
celebrity worship, that's it. she's to Britain as the kardashians are to the US
>hurr durr she was not pretty
She looked amazing compared to the monstrosities of the other royal members. She was young, she was a princess and the plebs loved her.
Kate or (lmao) Megan don't have 1% of her charm.
Here she look cute
Also we never said she looked ugly
We said she is nothing special
Just above average
God damn Charles look like a fricking bowser.
I mean considering most of the 1/10 slags you see on a daily basis Diana looks like a real 10 for you
she is attractive but kate and megan are definitely more attractive, you must be a homosexual or something
I disagree but I'm an oldgay and maybe this is a generational thing.
QRD why did Charles leave her for that g goblin Camilla?
He saw Diana as an intellectual midget who was just breeding stock. Marrying her and having sex was just him doing his duty to make her pump out some princes.
What he really wanted was someone he could think of as an equal, and that she most definitely was not.
looks like a troon. Way too tall and weird looking. That butter face.
>Megan don't have 1% of her charm.
which is funny, as Meghan tried her darnest to be Diana
"I'm the Queen of England"
Should Charles have been king? Why Prince Phillip instead of King Phillip of UK? British monarchy is anachronistic...
why is kazuma a dog?
actually aqua as a monarch (with kazuma as her tard wrangler of course) would be an improvement over the house of windsor
>Why Prince Phillip instead of King Phillip of UK?
Because parliament refused to make Anne and Victoria's consorts King because they were scary foreigners and it just stuck.
non-royal royal
It doesn’t matter how cool and down to earth you think a girl is, I promise you deep down she wants to be swept off her feet by a handsome prince, have the most ludicrously opulent wedding in human history, and live a life of fame and admiration in a palace somewhere. Diana was the plain jane “common” girl that represented the ultimate female fantasy. Sure she wasn’t that common and he wasn’t that handsome, but it didn’t matter. Add the family drama and tabloid gossip element and that shit is like crack to women.
What's the male equivalent? Being a King with a harem?
Genghis Khan
Christopher Hitchens - Diana: The Mourning After
https://invidious.snopyta.org/watch?v=1cdIcmdWr6I
how exactly did the queen kill her? did she walk up to her and suffocate her to death after the accident like the sopranos?
the papparazzi who caused the accident were glowie agents working for the queen in this theory I believe
>the papparazzi who caused the accident
its just a conspiracy theory no doubt cooked up by irish swine
She hugged AIDS people.
Prolly cuz King Charlie 3 using Charlie's
Angels killed his Wife and his Mother.
She was a commoner marrying into the royal family, like 99.99.9% of people in the world are commoners. She was also more likable than the royals.
megan was the same principle but she's not likeable so noone cares about her.
>She was a commoner
Lmao she came from one of the oldest noble families of England. She was as blue-blooded as it gets. But still interesting that it took 42 posts this time for someone to say that bs.
Just women and their princess fantasies living vicariously through her.
basically
>golddigger marries the crown prince
>bullshit her way into populairty
>cheats him with everything that moves
>Charles gets sick of him and does the same
>media shits on Charles for doing it
>gold-digger dies in a car accident and a billion documentaries about her "tragic life" are made
This, basically. I fricking hate the Windsors and monarchy in general, but I can't argue that Charles wasn't in the right. He got done dirty by a BPD prostitute with media savviness.
You don't understand she was a literal saint who cared about people and did nothing wrong.
What did she actually do to benefit anyone?
The same goes for every modern monsrchy. What do they do?
>What did she actually do to benefit anyone?
She removed some mines in Bosnia and some African country.
But Bosnia wasn't even a British colony?
Neither was Angola, she was known as a philanthropist regardless of boundaries.
Is it possible princess Diana was a troony? You know how the royal families like to do that type of stuff to secretly "get over one" on the public. An inside joke thing.
It's "get one over" you idiot
They personally keep Britain (aka the entire world) safe from the barbaric Irish (the world would NOT be a better place if they took over)
She started taking brown Muslim dick, Anglo women were swooning at the idea
This is why they killed her
Can't have Muslims mixing in with the spawn of Satan. Later on down the line one of them might pull an Andrew Jackson, or a JFK
And it's bad enough wanting a brown guy, but royals don't frick with their bloodlines. Look at the Habsburgs in Spain, that ended up inbreeding until they had a guy that was moronic, hideous, and sterile... and they STILL tried to breed the c**t
She was really a he, the royal she
Watch Christopher Hitchens' documentary The Mourning After.
Harry isn't Charles's kid and everyone knows it including him; his father was some stud RN sailor Diana boned.
This.
Idiots.
Watch her in interviews. She has a weirdly captivating and down to earth persona. That made the plebs identify with her, even more so when she was going through the divorce drama.
Ask my mom. She was obsessed with her
Charles never gave a fricking shit about her anyway; he had the oldskool medieval royalty mentality that marriage was a contractual obligation to shit out a heir to the throne and you took a mistress you were actually into. It wasn't at all like his parents where it was true love.
wait wasn't Philip writing Elizabeth love letters when she was 13?
chrishansen.jpg
Elizabeth and Philip did love each other but the only reason that marriage happened in the first place is because Louis Mountbatten pressured Philip into going after the Princess Elizabeth so the 'House of Mountbatten' would rule over the empire, hence the whole writing love letters to a teenager. Of course what actually happened was that Philip got fricked over and the House of Windsor still remains and will now never change its name regardless of the monarch's gender.
She was the celebrity monarch the common people can relate to because of her early roots and how she was open compared to the Royal Family
>t.Mom was a Diana fangirl growing up