"southeast asians" do not exist as a race.
genetic study shows they are mostly simply a result of the southward migration of east asians with haplogroup O in the very recent timescale.
archeological southeast asians were Australoids continuously to the Indian subcontinent.
>Native Americans and Inuits are different races but Europeans, MENA, Pygmies and Sub Saharan Africans are not. >Middle Eastern people belong to the same race as North Africans but not Southern Europeans. >Central Asians not mentioned >North East Africans not mentioned
>Is pic related accurate?
No, it's arbitrary like any other attempt to categorise human races. It's funny how Westerners love to push the narrative of "MENA" as some kind of unified racial identity, the average Euro-wannabe Turk would chimpout if someone tells him that he's part of the same race as "Arabs" / Arabs. I'm Levantine and I'm probably about as related to a random Swiss as I am to my Moroccan father-in-law and other similar Moroccans (Berbers and Arabised Berbers), let alone to a byproduct of Islamisation like a random Moroccan "Arab" with 50% Berber / 40% West African / 10% Arab ancestry.
But Sub-Saharan Africa is the funniest one, unless you're blind or n imbecile you're never going to mistake a Habesha for a Yoruba.
>How many races are there?
One, the modern human race.
Try to clone a Neanderthal if you want to see humans that would make sense to be called a different "race".
>they're both chinks with slanted eyes
If northern peoples with slanted eyes (e.g. Nivkh) and southern peoples with slanted eyes (e.g. Thai) are both "Chinks", then Swedes and Barbers...
Distance to: Nivkh
0.25222487 Thai
Distance to: Moroccan_North
0.25039273 Swedish
>but
Don't blame the player, blame the game.
1 month ago
Anonymous
>mongoloids and mongoloids >caucasoids and caucasoids
groundbreaking
1 month ago
Anonymous
Good point, but Caucasoid and Mongoloid are about the anatomy, in particular the cranial morphology.
>native americans >arctic peoples >pacific islanders >southeast asians
are all the same race >europeans >MENA
are the same race >south asians
are mutts (caucasoid+AASI)
East Africans are closer to Eurasians than they are to West Africans
MENA and Europe are West Eurasian
Pacific Islanders, Arcticc Peoples, Northeast and Southeast Asians are all just East Asians and most are Neolithic or even Iron Age migrations.
South Asians might work but only Dravidians
Andamanese exist
Aboriginals should include Papuans and Melanesians
Native Americans are debatable, the mixture is pretty late but there is a lot of unique drift in them
Rest are mixtures or clines so they don't count
Only ones missing would be various lineages which now exist only as part of mixtures like ANA and Basal.
Chimps
Orangutans
Gorillas are also part of the human race
Sub-Saharan Africans are already there anon
But not Baboons? Guess that means you're excluded.
"southeast asians" do not exist as a race.
genetic study shows they are mostly simply a result of the southward migration of east asians with haplogroup O in the very recent timescale.
archeological southeast asians were Australoids continuously to the Indian subcontinent.
>Native Americans and Inuits are different races but Europeans, MENA, Pygmies and Sub Saharan Africans are not.
>Middle Eastern people belong to the same race as North Africans but not Southern Europeans.
>Central Asians not mentioned
>North East Africans not mentioned
Sub-Saharan Africans need to be divided up a little more. West Africans and East/South Africans are very distinct.
>South Africans
11.
Capoids and Congoids
Splitters won all the fights, and now even hybrid animals are their own species. The one exception is people.
that's because moronic splitters want to claim "LOOK I DISCOVERED 1000000 NEW SPECIES GIVE ME FUNDING" on their University Research profile.
>Is pic related accurate?
No, it's arbitrary like any other attempt to categorise human races. It's funny how Westerners love to push the narrative of "MENA" as some kind of unified racial identity, the average Euro-wannabe Turk would chimpout if someone tells him that he's part of the same race as "Arabs" / Arabs. I'm Levantine and I'm probably about as related to a random Swiss as I am to my Moroccan father-in-law and other similar Moroccans (Berbers and Arabised Berbers), let alone to a byproduct of Islamisation like a random Moroccan "Arab" with 50% Berber / 40% West African / 10% Arab ancestry.
But Sub-Saharan Africa is the funniest one, unless you're blind or n imbecile you're never going to mistake a Habesha for a Yoruba.
>How many races are there?
One, the modern human race.
Try to clone a Neanderthal if you want to see humans that would make sense to be called a different "race".
imagine sucking the monkey milk out of her breasts
NE asians and SE asians are the same race
Nope. DNA proved otherwise. SE Asians have way more Desinova.
proof
Archaic introgression in amh is a hoax.
No arguments.
they're both chinks with slanted eyes
>they're both chinks with slanted eyes
If northern peoples with slanted eyes (e.g. Nivkh) and southern peoples with slanted eyes (e.g. Thai) are both "Chinks", then Swedes and Barbers...
Distance to: Nivkh
0.25222487 Thai
Distance to: Moroccan_North
0.25039273 Swedish
>but
Don't blame the player, blame the game.
>mongoloids and mongoloids
>caucasoids and caucasoids
groundbreaking
Good point, but Caucasoid and Mongoloid are about the anatomy, in particular the cranial morphology.
>native americans
>arctic peoples
>pacific islanders
>southeast asians
are all the same race
>europeans
>MENA
are the same race
>south asians
are mutts (caucasoid+AASI)
americans
peoples
islanders
asians
>are all the same race
and northeast asians, obviously
Noah had 3 sons
East Africans are closer to Eurasians than they are to West Africans
MENA and Europe are West Eurasian
Pacific Islanders, Arcticc Peoples, Northeast and Southeast Asians are all just East Asians and most are Neolithic or even Iron Age migrations.
South Asians might work but only Dravidians
Andamanese exist
Aboriginals should include Papuans and Melanesians
Native Americans are debatable, the mixture is pretty late but there is a lot of unique drift in them
Rest are mixtures or clines so they don't count
Only ones missing would be various lineages which now exist only as part of mixtures like ANA and Basal.