>Porn
lol, if you have to ask ... >16K 15,360x8,640 >Why
come on, 105" TVs barely can do 8K >Why not?
Not very many people own drive-in theatres. >Is there a point where ``Resolution'' stops being noticable
Yes, when you close your eyes.
>Is there a point where Resolution stops being noticable
yes. past 4K, it's basically a waste of resources when accounting for pixels-per-degree and human eyesight
how does 8k reduce information if 4k didnt?
most people run 4k monitors at 150%+ scaling, they arent getting any additional information out of them except in slightly expanded screen real estate
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
because our eyesight will not parse all of it and the information is lost
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
Because 4K on say a 27" monitor at a normal ~30" distance is 90PPD, which is basically as good as it gets for anybody who doesn't very exceptional eyesight, like 1% of the population. Apples Retina displays are 57PPD and they look great already, as an example.
I can perfectly imagine some people I know talking endlessly about how their new 16K TV is so much better than other people's TV because bla bla bla and getting mad when I answer that I don't see the difference and ask where the frick they find 16K content to watch on this.
Depends on screen size, distance between user and screen, etc. Plus it's pointless going bigger than 4k right now anyway due to the lack of content that can take advantage of a larger resolution
also I prefer my porn in very low resolution, so you can imagine details better than they actually are, your imagination is always better than reality. The best of the best being pixel art porn.
I just did a quick google and it seems ePorner has full 4K videos up, over 28k
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
28k porn? You are lying add me on disc lol
lone_wanderer37
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
28k videos, not 28k resolution you ding dong.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
I'm with this Anon. After watching UHD and VR videos, I realized that I really don't want to see that level of detail. Give me the blur back. Slather Vaseline on those camera lenses.
I'm with this Anon. After watching UHD and VR videos, I realized that I really don't want to see that level of detail. Give me the blur back. Slather Vaseline on those camera lenses.
depends on how wide you want your content to be when viewing
for the typical cinema screen width of 40° FoV, 4k is just about enough to be unable to distinguish pixels, so for classic movies 8k already gives you plenty of headroom
There's a point where higher resolution starts becoming undesirable, especially so with porn
Do you really wanna see every single skin pore, every stray hair and each chip in her teeth?
>Is there a point where Resolution stops being noticable
When it comes to captured video, 1080p.
Most 4K footage is noisy garbage, let alone 8K/16K. 4K and up only make sense for photography or 3D animated stuff.
>Is there a point where Resolution stops being noticable
Yes. When the pixel size at the distance that the screen is gets to the point where your fovea can't discriminate the angle any more.
It's not a fixed resolution: it depends on how far the device is from your eyes as well. (Only the fovea matters for this; the rest of your retina has lower resolution but your brain does postprocessing to make up for it.)
The sweet spot for the human eye where it can no longer see a single pixel is 32k resolution on a 32 inch screen. Thats the holy grail of DPI
>Porn
lol, if you have to ask ...
>16K 15,360x8,640
>Why
come on, 105" TVs barely can do 8K
>Why not?
Not very many people own drive-in theatres.
>Is there a point where ``Resolution'' stops being noticable
Yes, when you close your eyes.
good luck finding a lens for that
I haven't seen a 1366x768 panel in years, laptops seem to bottom out at 1920x1080 these days.
https://www.currys.co.uk/products/asus-vivobook-17-x705ma-17-laptop-intel-celeron-256-gb-ssd-grey-10261633.html
1600x900 £500 saar
>currys
can't make this shit up
what about it?
he was a bicycle salesman
They will keep going until all wallets are empty. I imagine Mel Brooks dressed up as Yoda saying, "Spaceballs 2: The basedch for mo money"
haha 4ch changed my text, nifty keen.
anon of culture and refinement. +1 internets
>Is there a point where Resolution stops being noticable
yes. past 4K, it's basically a waste of resources when accounting for pixels-per-degree and human eyesight
You said the same thing for 1080p.
No one said that for 1920x1080.
no i didn't. 8K is actually a reduction in information for the vast majority of people. 4K is genuinely the endgame
how does 8k reduce information if 4k didnt?
most people run 4k monitors at 150%+ scaling, they arent getting any additional information out of them except in slightly expanded screen real estate
because our eyesight will not parse all of it and the information is lost
Because 4K on say a 27" monitor at a normal ~30" distance is 90PPD, which is basically as good as it gets for anybody who doesn't very exceptional eyesight, like 1% of the population. Apples Retina displays are 57PPD and they look great already, as an example.
I can perfectly imagine some people I know talking endlessly about how their new 16K TV is so much better than other people's TV because bla bla bla and getting mad when I answer that I don't see the difference and ask where the frick they find 16K content to watch on this.
Depends on screen size, distance between user and screen, etc. Plus it's pointless going bigger than 4k right now anyway due to the lack of content that can take advantage of a larger resolution
also I prefer my porn in very low resolution, so you can imagine details better than they actually are, your imagination is always better than reality. The best of the best being pixel art porn.
4K porn is something else
i don't even think i've ever seen 4k porn because I cba to download it, just stream it
any free sites that do 4k for professionally filmed stuff?
You can pirate, the quality is something else
I just did a quick google and it seems ePorner has full 4K videos up, over 28k
28k porn? You are lying add me on disc lol
lone_wanderer37
28k videos, not 28k resolution you ding dong.
Nah not really 4K porn is something else..
Sorry sir don't take away my porn license
I'm with this Anon. After watching UHD and VR videos, I realized that I really don't want to see that level of detail. Give me the blur back. Slather Vaseline on those camera lenses.
depends on how wide you want your content to be when viewing
for the typical cinema screen width of 40° FoV, 4k is just about enough to be unable to distinguish pixels, so for classic movies 8k already gives you plenty of headroom
Depends on screen size and viewing distance, idiot
You can only give a limit in angular resolution
There's a point where higher resolution starts becoming undesirable, especially so with porn
Do you really wanna see every single skin pore, every stray hair and each chip in her teeth?
I'm not wasting my data on anything more than 720p. My provider starts throttling after I use up 100GB of traffic.
>home internet over 5g
No such thing. Only 4g here. Also no optics.
>Is there a point where Resolution stops being noticable
When it comes to captured video, 1080p.
Most 4K footage is noisy garbage, let alone 8K/16K. 4K and up only make sense for photography or 3D animated stuff.
>Is there a point where Resolution stops being noticable
That's irrelevant. Videos should be zoomable.
>Is there a point where Resolution stops being noticable
Yes. Apple calls this "Retina"
>Is there a point where Resolution stops being noticable
Yes. When the pixel size at the distance that the screen is gets to the point where your fovea can't discriminate the angle any more.
It's not a fixed resolution: it depends on how far the device is from your eyes as well. (Only the fovea matters for this; the rest of your retina has lower resolution but your brain does postprocessing to make up for it.)