That's 5:4 tho. I have no idea why they switched to such weird ratio in the early LCD days. Were there even any decent 4:3 LCDs?
AFAIK the evolution was
5:4 => 16:10 => 16:9 => ultrawide etc...
I have this monitor. I use it at work for my terminal that I build code in. It just werks and I dont need more. I have a bigger screen for stuff I actually need to look at for a while.
I have this monitor. It's currently hooked up to Windows 98 machine.
Laughs in 21:9
What the frick is up with the Black folk making up these aspect ratios not reducing the ratio to coprimes?
you mean 7:3
I have thrown many of these away
glad retroomers are finally moving on to early lcd displays
i just tired of hunting widescreen patches for games i like to play. these monitors just werk no fixes needed
>can't switch resolution
what are you, a wingay?
1280x1024 is a really comfy resolution, I can't blame them.
That's 5:4 tho. I have no idea why they switched to such weird ratio in the early LCD days. Were there even any decent 4:3 LCDs?
AFAIK the evolution was
5:4 => 16:10 => 16:9 => ultrawide etc...
I have two of these in use today, and they've been in constant use since around 2007.
>literally the worst 4:3 monitors ever made
Why would anyone subject themselves to these pieces of shits when CRTs are better in every way?
where can I get a crt monitor
Same place you get any old monitor
where can I get any old monitor
E waste center
16:10 is God
And only macbooks have it
GAY!
>only macbooks have it
3:2 is crown prince and 5:4 regent
>4:3
That's monitor is 5:4, zoomoid.
you're mother is 5:4 when i fricked her last night.
>not using 1250/27
Still get these in like 10 units at my factory. They run as new.
I have this monitor. I use it at work for my terminal that I build code in. It just werks and I dont need more. I have a bigger screen for stuff I actually need to look at for a while.
>tfw I got my hands on an immaculate Dell 2007fp for 20 bucks
feels good man
You know that's 5:4, right?