>512GB SSDs are $31 now
>1TB SSDs are $55 now
>2TB SSDs are $97 now
>4TB SSDs are $198 now
>8TB SSDs are $590 now
>16TB SSDs are $1800 now
>30TB SSDs are $3700 now
>60TB SSDs are $6700 now
 It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
 CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
sex with the noa and with the big noa
>>2TB SSDs are $97 now
https://www.amazon.com/Silicon-Power-Performance-Internal-SP002TBSS3A55S25/dp/B07Q37V1C9/ref=sr_1_18?tag=ganker-20&crid=1EHKBXRU5HKH7&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.ipLweVhGAmLGAQZi8pGzS_wUUCANEWG09GwuBYO3N_XE1EZUgdICb0mf2ZH2CdwUb8CkXyv9TS46NMQ2oAV1X5m1UZIe5-6HSpEes0vWDNi6t1X6PE5_YkzRfFuV_BwPWQgAiyZKn-_xdEV42mp2Gkmj4l-yVWu4IWLWgJu-rrC78pyG9clLKXxYNMM7KtOWzmAIskonBMi6WFaFu3y7znwes38qId_tXouuaqpA6-w.hoxxt9Isv6tSa6YBKxqtOdzLjJruggK40v7Q3-FHPes&dib_tag=se&keywords=2%2BTB%2BSSD&sprefix=2%2Btb%2Bssd%2Caps%2C137&sr=8-18&th=1
Not 97 but damn near close with 5 seconds of searching.
>Your device has been set to read-only
enjoy
Is there any rationality to "cheap SSD must be unreliable"?
of course
you must be moronic
So no nothing then?
No stats? No data?
It's hard to find info but I would be careful with anything that doesn't advertise all specs, including nand, dram, and controller. Only real testing I've seen is for the chia crypto thing and it basically reiterated that modern tlc /qlc drives are shit. Mlc is dead and controllers are swapped out constantly. Make frequent backups and don't leave your ssd umpowered.
Controller and NAND swapping doesn't necessarily mean reliability is worse when you're not looking to write it to death.
I think what it boils down to is when you otherwise have nothing else to criticize (especially if you just looking for bulk storage on an SSD) when it comes to less expensive things, you attack it's reliability even if you have no real data of mass issues
No one wants to feel like a moron for overpaying but at the same time they really hate the idea of buying something cheap. So bullshit is made up to cope
True, not saying "avoid" but just be cautious. I know two people who have had an ssd randomly fail (one was a Samsung 870?), so price doesnt seem to have much effect. I guess I'm also in the boat of Gen 4 ssds being useless for most people if that makes you feel better
People who care about SSD performance are probably gays running Gnome, running a data center, or filecoin miners (or all three)
If your whole OS/applications (or at the very least the working set of the stuff you use) doesn't fit in 8 fricking gigabytes of ram then you've done something wrong.
Unless it's a reliable, established brand like Kingston, who generally are just dumping their 128 and 256 gig drives when they're doing their crazy $20-40 SSD sales, you're getting screwed. If it's not aliexpress fake companies selling you SD cards in a case, it's shitty memory with no DRAM cache that you'd be better off ignoring in favor of buying a WD gold hard disk.
>anon needs a link shortener because his ADHD rotted brain can't comprehend more than 140 characters total
>even though link shorteners can and will be abused by redirecting to fake locations, which is why most are spamfiltered
moron
>Unless it's a reliable, established brand like Kingston
Imagine being this much of a moronic zoomer consoomer to buy BRAND simply because it's BRAND instead of buying by internal components.
>it's shitty memory with no DRAM cache
So the same thing sold by almost every major brand including your precious Kingston, lole
And funny thing is Kingston makes some of the worst drives like the A400.
>Z-ZOOMER
>B-BRAND
Imagine being this much of a contrarian. You're more than free to buy the $20 5TB Xengshinghanluaominglongxiao TOP JOB SSD that's a 16GB SD card in an enclosure with a firmware hack.
>There is only scamsung and actual scams
>no inbetween goy
Zoomers are moronic
>don't buy scam garbage
>UR A israelite
Critical mental illness.
>kingston
>reliable
shiggydiggy
a.co is owned by Amazon and used to shorten amazon links officially. it's also used when you share links from their app. so there's no risk of anything malicious you moronic fricking moron.
cool story bro
I cheapened out on my new rig and my Corsair MP600 Pro (2TB) is at 98% health after 8 months of use (20TB written). I had a Samsung 850 (1TB) on my old rig and it's at 97% health after 8 years of use (110TB written). lol
There's nothing funnier than anons quoting CrystalDiskInfo's health percentage, like it's anything other than a made-up number.
Still, I doubt my current SSD will last more than 5 years.
>Check price history
>Was 60 bucks last year
Wow great deal
I am not buying an SSD that's guaranteed to be a QC reject
please post clean links you unshowered scum
this is what your link could have looked like if you weren't engaging so much into reddit sodomy:
a.co/d/8zKBDsf
>that link
>SATA3
what is this, 2017?
>*perfectly fine and usable technology*
>what is this? *year in the past*???
there is no hope. If anyone is reading this, just know, there is no hope.
>SATA3 maxes out at 600mb/s, IRL it's about 500
>shittiest m2 SSD: 1200mb/s
>average m2 SSD: 3000mb/s
>current top tier SSDs: 7000mb/s
Timetec SSDs
>chinkshit
Patriot and Timetec make 256GB SSDs that sell for $21, thought the Patriot drives are low on TBW, they are viable in a pinch. Timetec seems to be great value, and SSD tech is supposed to be increasing in price throughout this year due to logistical issues, or the top brands like Samsung and WD are collectively being greedy dicks.
I got this and notice it boots 10x slower than the old 5400rpm hdd it replaced. Userland is ok. Did I fug up?
you're a Black person
>dramless trash
windows caches on system ram. Also why bother with dram on SSDs? Oh no, my SSD will only last 20 years better buy one with dram.
I have the M.2 version of that. Adata quietly swapped the nand from that to QLC. Which is slower than HDD speeds.
Meaning that once you run out of the SLC cache then your drive will be slower than a HDD. I noticed it because I use the M.2 version as an external drive. I remember copying a 60gb file. First 10gb was at about 300mbps (remember it's attached via usb 3.0. So max speed is limited). But then the numbers dropped to 60mbs for rest of the transfer.
beeg noa
Yuru Camp?
are those Samsung SSDs or offbrand "we have SSD at home" garbages?
compared to when?
compared to when they didn't cost as cheap
Mfw
>16TB enterprise HDDs still $200 and not coming down
how can one possibly be pissed about that
poorgay deluxe
How?
10 TB HDD that I bought cost $165 here
>enterprise SSDs are getting bigger and bigger
>consumer SSDs are still stuck around 2-4TB
>consumer SSDs are still stuck around 256-512GB
fixed
>Consumers are buck broken to worship the m.2 form factor
>capacities above 4TB are not very practical and need very expensive double stack/density NAND
>enterprise use whatever format from U.2/U.3, EDSFF, Gen-z, etc and all have a larger surface aera for NAND
It's easy to explain
It's only gets difficult to explain if you otherwise refuse to acknowledge that M.2 is an outdated form factor.
If only people would have bought these instead of M.2 drives.
Too difficult to boot from
No room to install with modern 3.999 slot width monster GPUs and tiny ITX builds
You can boot that off any system that supports NVMe
M.2 isn't the only NVMe format
No, they should've bought U.2 instead. Disks with proper cooling and mounting built into the standard. Most M.2 devices are out of spec because they need heatsinks.
Well intel made a u.2 version of the 750. Ironically intel bet on both u.2 and pcie x4 with the first consumer NVME drive. And both standards would have been superior to m.2. But instead of buying the intel 750's people bought Samsung 950 pros. And that's why we are currently here.
It would really be best if M.2 remained a standard for laptops and desktops got U.2 drives. But that's not the world we live in, people would rather have one universal spec, even if it fricks up the desktop market.
Once again rich Americans are bragging about PC hardware prices
Isn't it nice that you can upgrade your laptop and put your old drive in your desktop as an extra drive?
Assuming your drive doesn't explode.
Why would it explode?
If anything it should run cooler in a desktop with proper heat sinks and plenty airflow.
They are stuck around the 500€ price range for the most expensive ones in the consumer market, because almost no one will buy the more expensive stuff.
Was like that since the first SSDs, 256gb, 512gb, 1tb and so on.
i still never owned a hard drive larger than 2tb. i guess im a poorgay i got like 3 1 tbs and 2 2tbs all my ssds are =<500gb
in the long run prolly should have bought a 1tb ssd and two 4tb drives.
They're pretty cheap now. You can get an external 4TB HDD for $80-100 in my country which is a bit more expensive than what 1-2 TB drives were going for in the mid 2010s if I remember right but I think the price is roughly the same if we take into account inflation.
huh, three animewaifus and free seat
Yep. Had a deal alert, this time I was on time
>vendido por:
>comprarlo de nuevo
NAKADASHl NOA MAMA
>>2TB SSDs are $97 now
insane, 6 years ago, I paid 97 USD for 256 GB SSD
insane, 6 months ago, I paid 60 USD for 2TB SSD
my first 128gb ssd was 200€
I bought a 1TB SSD for 42 euros and from the currency you may notice that it was overpriced as frick due to thefts such as taxes and import fees
>>16TB SSDs are $1800 now
Waiting for this to come down to $300-$400, one day
bought 8TB last year at 312 dollars
nice. I got 2 4tb last year
What do we think about the Lexar NM790? It seems like great bang for the buck, by the standards of 4TB PCIe 4 NVMe TLC SSDs at the very least.
https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/lexar-nm790-ssd-review
YMTC nand and no dram. Would avoid.
Tell me what brand of SSD's you buy. Personally I only buy these 3 brands for my computer. (unless it's for an external drive in a M.2 usb enclosure)
Samsung
Kioxia
intel (rip)
What is wrong with Crucial?
what a ten(s)
>QLC crap
If I wanted something slow that will only last me about 5 years I can just buy an HDD
seething
SSD for storage isn't a good as a HD?
HD lasts 4 years until it needs to be written over again. SSD 2-3 years before it leaks? Both are bad, almost like a llithium battery with no power left in it doesn't work anymore? Who needs that kind of battery.
>HD lasts 4 years until it needs to be written over again.
*10+
The HD will suffer mechanical failure before any data rots/corrodes.
You can be just fine off with either for storage, but just keep in mind how often they will need maintenance and don't be a stupid, lazy moron and neglect your stuff until you lose data.
I didn't realize some of these do SATA over the m.2 connector. I just bought a 1TB SSD that I can't even use in my laptop.
Why the frick wouldn't you just make it PCIe and put the sata controller on the peripheral? You need a controller to translate SATA to drive the flash chip anyway! Why did they make it so complicated?
M.2 is the form factor, not the connector. I assume your drive fits inside but doesn't work? Sounds like you need an NVMe.
Well yeah now I know.
>Why the frick wouldn't you just make it PCIe and put the sata controller on the peripheral?
I can think of two reasons:
1) SATA controllers can handle multiple drives, so it's wasteful to add a SATA controller to each SSD instead of one or two SATA controllers on the motherboard handling all drives.
2) PCIe lanes are expensive and often in short supply. (this is probably the main reason).
>a sata controller per device that gobbles up 2-4 pcie lanes to service that device
>a sata controller per machine that gobbles up 1 lane and services 6-8 devices
I know which one I would choose.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1B27_j9NDPU3cNlj2HKcrfpJKHkOf-Oi1DbuuQva2gT4/edit#gid=0
such a useful spreadsheet
We were supposed to have 100TB SSDs for $499 by now.
16TB HDDs are $300 now, and smaller ones can be found on the side of the road for free.