a bloated and nearly incoherent book, and a deliberate attempt—out of a misguided obsession with joyce—to create a ulysses of his own
sloppy antisemitic giganticism
He mentions something like that, though nowhere near as explicit in GR, in V. and M&D. But again, it’s just a mention. However it seems to be a common occurrence in his books.
This sub is starting to look like one of those circlejerk subreddits where they drive everything straight into the ground.
>this sub
Tell me you came from Reddit without telling me you came from reddit
wtf is a sub and who are "they"
I'm sure the bait sounded rich in your head
>sub
>sub
Go back, homosexual.
>sub
what?
>sub
Go back we’re full
You have to go back
nothing you've seen before, nothing you'll see again
Just read it, moron.
An entirely over the top verbosity until you want to have a nice day.
A piece of shit
a bloated and nearly incoherent book, and a deliberate attempt—out of a misguided obsession with joyce—to create a ulysses of his own
sloppy antisemitic giganticism
>sloppy antisemitic giganticism
Is this the reason this board gushes over GR so much or is it actually good?
read it and find out!
how does he write like this it's frustrating i can't figure it out
apparently with a pencil and some graph paper
anything else?
bales of weed
So when he say >They? what he actually means is >~~*They*~~?
b/c everyone knows what he meant anyway
wow that is a very apt characterization. i just put myself through that trash
how far did you make it?
i read the whole thing
Calvinist Heresies
incomprehensible prose and boomer era smut
filtered
what's zoomer era smut?
Once you read the Bianca section you will realise that Pynchon is irrefutably a degenerate pedo
sHe'S sIxTeEn!!!1
anyone not getting hard during that section is not a man, simple as
i guess that might be how you see it if you totally miss how sex and trauma function as themes of the book
He mentions something like that, though nowhere near as explicit in GR, in V. and M&D. But again, it’s just a mention. However it seems to be a common occurrence in his books.
>He mentions something like that
??
something like wha
show us on the doll where the prose touched you
Directionless blob of some random homosexual's hobbies and interests
get wrekt
a lot more sex than you probably expect
eating shit
but with proper antibiotics