Don't be a pussy. Change it to start of novel/screenplay/whatever. You don't have to post the writing but you do have to post the response:
>You are a literary critic. You will be rating a short story. Analyze the themes, rate the quality of the writing, and compare it to other authors. Say if it is worthy of publication. You must be as objective as possible. Try to rely on objective measures of quality given by other literary critics. Do not be afraid to criticize, you are a professional literary critic.
I'm tempted to do this but I don't want make an account. That's required to use chatgpt, isn't it?
you can use bingchat on edge browser without an account I think. if you tell it to be specific it lets you put in more characters
thanks, edge and perplexity work. gemini seems to need a google login.
I use Google's Gemini (formerly Bard, the better name; what the frick is a Gemini?) and Perplexity. But Gemini is the more creative of the two. Perplexity gives more facts and comprehensive information but is less 'intelligent' than Bard, shown in mainly understanding of obscure or cryptic references.
Gemini is pretty good, but I liked Bard better. Bard seemed to have a literary flair that Gemini doesn't quite reach.
Gemini analysis of "Time and Again" (https://shortstoryproject.com/stories/time-and-again/):
Strengths:
Vivid Atmosphere: The story creates a strong sense of place and atmosphere. The harsh winter weather, the deserted landscape, and the lonely routine of the protagonist are all effectively depicted.
Compelling Voice: The first-person narration from the perspective of the aging plow driver is unique and engaging. His simple, unfiltered thoughts and observations draw the reader into his world.
Suspense: The story builds a sense of unease and suspense, particularly with the introduction of the hitchhiker and his unsettling comments.
Weaknesses:
Unresolved Mystery: The central mystery of the protagonist's missing son and his connection to the hitchhiker is left unresolved. While this can be an effective technique, it may leave some readers frustrated.
Pacing: The middle section of the story with the hitchhiker can feel repetitive at times.
Character Development: The protagonist remains somewhat enigmatic. We get glimpses into his past and emotional state, but his motivations and inner world could be further explored.
Comparisons to Other Authors:
The story's bleak atmosphere and exploration of isolation evoke comparisons to the works of Cormac McCarthy, particularly "Blood Meridian" and "The Road." The first-person narration with a limited perspective also shares similarities with Ernest Hemingway's style.
Publishable Potential:
The story has strong elements and a unique voice. However, depending on the target audience and editorial preferences, it might benefit from further development. Here are some suggestions:
Explore the mystery: Providing some resolution or additional clues about the missing son and his connection to the hitchhiker could enhance the story's impact.
Develop the protagonist: Delving deeper into the protagonist's emotional state, his past trauma, and his motivations could create a more well-rounded character.
Tighten the pacing: Streamlining the dialogue and action in the middle section could improve the story's flow.
Overall:
"Mr. Weeks" [i.e., Time and Again] is a well-written story with a strong atmosphere and a compelling central mystery. With some additional development, it has the potential to be published in literary journals or short story collections.
I put in Pancake's Time and Again with that prompt and it gave a wordy, polished sounding, but very generic analysis... not even picking up on the fact that the main character is by every indication a serial killer. So advised, the AI offered this: "You're absolutely correct, and I appreciate you bringing that aspect to light. The potential interpretation of the snow plow driver as a serial murderer adds a chilling layer of complexity to the narrative." Etc., etc.
>Erotica
>References Anais Nin and Anne Rice
>ChatGPT actually shows cultured taste in literary erotica
I'm impressed
I gave it three samples.
First: 6/10
Second: 8/10
Third: 7/10
It said with some polishing and refinement for stilted dialogue it would be publishable material. It's from my scifi book. I've been writing and editing it the past 4 years.
the bot is too nice
>ynr certain journals and editors and creative writing programs were charging you $50 a pop to deliver this kind of advice
I made an incomplete short story written entirely in a series of haikus. After pic related I asked what I would get out of a 1 to 10 rating, and it gave me a 'solid 7/10'.
so has this been helpful to anyone? like does it actually give good advice?
Intermittently helpful. It can be a decent copy-editor, but it doesn't perform the function of editorial analysis being asked in this thread particularly well. With copyediting, the best results are not just from one pass, but from continuing to tweak the problem areas - at the sentence and phrase level - if you're really trying to polish something. Also, it's pretty good at helping develop an idea. If you have an inchoate idea, you can say something like "develop this idea: [handful of (not necessarily grammatically coherent) words that sketch the skeleton of a thought]," and it's surprisingly good at taking the idea and putting flesh on it.
Also, of the two AIs I use, I'm sometimes surprised at which does a better job, chatgpt or gemini.
They do tend to give good information and 'advice_ as for as they are allowed and able to comprehend and communicate the knowledge they gather. If you don't know something, a LLM chatbot is oftentimes way better than regular search. It's like advanced search, but you have some know-it-all assistant to aggregate a massive amount of information for you and synthesize the results into a easily palatable format.
It gives the same reply more or less for everything. Believe me. I have spent a year trying to leverage it, it is useless for fiction. Maybe for nonfiction, there could be something there.
Out of all them, the best rn is Claude imo. Still bad.
To know whether an LLM can judge writing well, you should test it by asking it to rate some classics, as well as some garbage writing, Twilight, Nabokov, and such stuff. Is anyone willing to try that? (I'm not because I don't want to create a ChatGPT account)
It rated the first chapter of Divergent 9/10 when I asked
Just submitted twilight first chapter. 6/10
This thing may be kind of accurate but it tends to rate higher its evaluations
Another thing is, I'm sure they're artificially bottlenecking the power of these programs. How would they do with these types of questions if their full power was unleashed? (And if something other than the consistently "nice" personality that is seen in virtually all chatgpt and gemini responses were allowed.)
Ultimately, is literary analysis subject to ai in the same way games of strategy like chess, go or war are?
If you haven't seen this by the way, it's quite fascinating: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WXuK6gekU1Y&ab_channel=GoogleDeepMind
I'm an AI expert and AI is only good at faking knowledge of stuff. That's why it's so good at writing high school papers. I wouldn't trust its opinion any more than I'd trust it's ability to solve basic word puzzles.
Use Claude instead ChatGPT sucks dick
Why is it sucking my dick?
"The School Trip" is a poignant exploration of isolation, family dynamics, and unexpected moments of connection. The protagonist's journey from feeling invisible within his own family to finding a brief sense of belonging during a school trip is portrayed with raw emotion and introspection.
The themes of loneliness, parental neglect, and the longing for genuine human connection are skillfully woven throughout the narrative. The protagonist's retreat into online friendships as a means of escape highlights the modern-day struggle of finding acceptance and understanding in a world that often feels indifferent or hostile.
The writing effectively captures the protagonist's inner turmoil and desperation, creating a palpable sense of unease and tension. The use of sensory details, such as the aroma of coffee and the sight of the bazaar, adds depth to the setting and enhances the reader's immersion in the story.
In terms of quality, the prose is evocative and engaging, drawing the reader into the protagonist's world from the very first sentence. The author's use of vivid imagery and introspective narration contributes to the overall impact of the story.
Comparing the writing style to other authors, "The School Trip" shares similarities with works by authors who explore themes of alienation and self-discovery, such as J.D. Salinger and Haruki Murakami. Like these authors, the writer demonstrates a keen understanding of human psychology and emotion, crafting a narrative that resonates on a deep emotional level.
As for publication, "The School Trip" offers a compelling and thought-provoking exploration of universal themes that are relevant to readers of all ages. Its raw honesty and emotional depth make it a worthy candidate for publication in literary magazines or anthologies. However, further refinement of the narrative structure and character development could enhance its overall impact and appeal to a wider audience.