All the best scientists of all time have been occultists in lab coats

ALL of them.
It’s only the pencil pushers, dogmatists and bureaucrat scientism-ists that reflexively fear mysticism.

CRIME Shirt $21.68

UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68

CRIME Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Based. One day, science will itself end up proving the supernatural true which it today deems pseudoscientific.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      There are two categories of 'scientists'. The first one is the kind that will do science even in absense of any direct or short-term rewards. This kind has given rise to many of our most important discoveries and if partnered up with some good business sense also given birth to many of our most important companies and corporations.
      The second kind which describes most of our modern scientists do it because they want a job or think they can get a good job and have been conditioned into thinking that academic jobs are worthwhile and valuable.

      Ywnbas

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    There are two categories of 'scientists'. The first one is the kind that will do science even in absense of any direct or short-term rewards. This kind has given rise to many of our most important discoveries and if partnered up with some good business sense also given birth to many of our most important companies and corporations.
    The second kind which describes most of our modern scientists do it because they want a job or think they can get a good job and have been conditioned into thinking that academic jobs are worthwhile and valuable.

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >the greatest mathematician of the 20th century
    Lol

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Indeed
      And don’t get me started on Godel and Einstein’s spiritual basedness

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Intelligent people can also be schizo, nothing surprising.
    Also, who ?

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Uhm sweaty, 298779 is an integer

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    No we just need to redefine kilometer, god is always correct chud

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    For me it's the Supreme Fascist.

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Fix the image, it's 300,000,000 m not 300,000

    Why is it 299,792,458 m/s

    But 300,000 km/s?

    Why is it so close to 300,0000,000 but not?

    Is this because the unit of a second is slightly off kilter with the unit of a 'm'?

    Why is it so close to being two numbers headed by 300, in the family of 'm' (m and km) only to be off by the relatively smallest of amounts?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I thought km and m were like 1 and 1000 so how would they ever be unproportional when dealing with such square number? 1000 2000 3000 100 000 200 000 300 000

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      [...]
      Meter is defined by the distance light travels in vaccum in 1/299,792,458 of a second.

      So how does it go from 299,792,458

      To the even 300,000 km?

      Also why was that number chosen to be the cut off point of the distance, there must have been some other relavance, convienience

      What the frick are you taking about?
      Read the OP again.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Was talking about op image babe.

        Look at op image then what I wrote

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Ohh, but I was also wondering how if there is a proportion of 1km to 1000m

        How 300,000 km results in 299,792,458 m

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    The meter is arbitrary, so if anything the definition of a meter would be the thing that is corrupted, not the speed of light.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I thought km and m were like 1 and 1000 so how would they ever be unproportional when dealing with such square number? 1000 2000 3000 100 000 200 000 300 000

      Meter is defined by the distance light travels in vaccum in 1/299,792,458 of a second.

      So how does it go from 299,792,458

      To the even 300,000 km?

      Also why was that number chosen to be the cut off point of the distance, there must have been some other relavance, convienience

  10. 2 years ago
    I support calculus CAPTCHAS

    Bunch o' midwits ITT.

    If you're ~~*occult*~~ enough to believe in the devil manipulating muh physical constants, you're also occult enough to believe that the arbitrarily chosen units have some sort of universal importance.

    Verification not required.

  11. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Yeah, pretty much. Look up Hermeticism.

  12. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    that is so moronic. Because a "meter" is a arbitrary human invention used to measure things. It could have been or be another unit of measure where the result for the speed of light gives you a nice, round number. Nature just is. It doesn't measure itself in human constructs.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      so is a second

      what's a better fixed system?
      We can use plank as our distance, what about time?

  13. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    He was almost definitely joking

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *