YT Math classes, find a tutor or get them to make you work on hard exercises, repetition is important, but challenging yourself iw what will make you actually "get good".
Just review arithmetic using whatever pdf comes up first, then brute force trig and algebra via some book like Sullivan, then brute force Calc 1 by just trying to do any decent book and watching videos and asking questions
Then circle back and do more foundations stuff, but don't stop and do this until you just brute force bullshit your way into being half decent at Calc 1 otherwise you will get demoralized. Math is 99% just showing up (until Calc 2, then it becomes actual thinking/work). Just show up until you get to calc 1, don't overthink shit or try to find perfect methods. Better to work through one bad trig book than spend 3 months trying to find a trig book that tickles your balls just right.
Read the IQfy sticky
Basic Mathematics by Lang, if you can't understand it, Khan Academy till you do
Math for dummies
Same here. I tried Khan academy but it's aimed at actual children so it's a bit too simple.
YT Math classes, find a tutor or get them to make you work on hard exercises, repetition is important, but challenging yourself iw what will make you actually "get good".
Just review arithmetic using whatever pdf comes up first, then brute force trig and algebra via some book like Sullivan, then brute force Calc 1 by just trying to do any decent book and watching videos and asking questions
Then circle back and do more foundations stuff, but don't stop and do this until you just brute force bullshit your way into being half decent at Calc 1 otherwise you will get demoralized. Math is 99% just showing up (until Calc 2, then it becomes actual thinking/work). Just show up until you get to calc 1, don't overthink shit or try to find perfect methods. Better to work through one bad trig book than spend 3 months trying to find a trig book that tickles your balls just right.
1 + 1 = 2
1 x 1 = 1
1 ^ 1 = 1
√-1 = 1
∫dx = x + c
Pretty much all you need to know.
I was following you till 1 ^ 1 = 1
1 ^ 1 = 1
1 ^ 2 = 1
1 ^ 3 = 1
1 ^ 4 = 1
Now, without googling it, answer this:
1 ^ 5 = ?
1
Okay now do:
2 ^ 1 = 2
3 ^ 1 = 3
4 ^ 1 = ??
I think you'll see the pattern now.
4
Right. It just puts out whatever number is on the left.
do you do tutoring?
Yes. $300/hr starting, any subject you want.
I can't afford that
Okay if you'll wear leggings and be my live-in maid I'll teach you for free
yay =^.^=
I see the pattern. The answer is 6.
F(2) = 2 + (2 - 2) * (2 - 3)
= 2 + 0 * (-1)
= 2 + 0
= 2
So, 2 ^ 1 = 2.
F(3) = 3 + (3 - 2) * (3 - 3)
= 3 + 1 * 0
= 3 + 0
= 3
So, 3 ^ 1 = 3.
F(4) = 4 + (4 - 2) * (4 - 3)
= 4 + 2 * 1
= 4 + 2
= 6
So, 4 ^ 1 = 6.
No it just puts out whatever number is on the left, how the frick could 4 make 6
>∫dx = x + c
more like
∫dx = 1x + c
since you are obsessed with 1
x quus y = x + y, if x, y < 57;
= 5 otherwise.
It's wrong because it isn't beautiful. You just KNOW. Philosophers will never understand this: math is applied theology.