No. Women have been historically underrepresented in most intellectual fields and had fewer academic opportunities precisely because of prejudice like this
It's usually poor induction to go with conspiracy theories over a simpler explanation which is more probable. But I guess poor induction is a given with femoids.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Do you really think that half of humanity would be lacking in a fundamental human trait?
2 years ago
Anonymous
My cat is a good hunter, but he prefers staying at home and eating what I give him.
2 years ago
Anonymous
You oppress, enslave, and subjugate your cat. Nice analogy moron.
2 years ago
Anonymous
The window is open all the time, he can choose to come and go when he wishes. If he wanted to live somewhere else, there'd be nothing to stop him doing so either.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>le free will in 2022
You could also use a window, the higher the better
2 years ago
Anonymous
women also were more likely to die younger from giving birth, and by large are not concerned with masculine pursuits like philosophy over childrearing. This persists to this day so it’s not like medical advancements and birth control helped liberate women all that much, it seems to have solidified their decisions to pursue brainless shit anyway.
2 years ago
Anonymous
I see that you’ve not met a woman for the past few decades.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>do you really think that there is such a thing as sexual dimorphism?
Yes.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Pick a fight with 20727307 then.
How do you explain the statistical outliers? Have you personally won 2 Nobel prizes in 2 scientific fields as a male? Have you, as a member of the “more introspective” sex, written the world’s first novel?
2 years ago
Anonymous
>How do you explain the statistical outliers?
Various combination of genes combined with different expressions of them based on environment
Not like IQfygay would even bother to understand any of this
>women lack introspection >no, now that women have been given a voice we actually know that it's because of exterior stuff
Like pottery
>le free will in 2022
You could also use a window, the higher the better
So by defending "women have poor induction" we end up at "women have no free will". There's also "men actively prevent women from doing anything" but that would mean men can at the same time do stuff and prevent women from doing stuff, and we're back to either women being inferior to men on these points, or women liking/accepting the current situation, or women having no free will.
I won't pretend that I have the answer, but there's something going on here
my marcus aurelius phase was when I was 14. read meditations twice then grew out of it. Never had a Nietzsche phase, hated him because I was christcuck, then hated him because I was a moral nihilist and I saw him as trying to escape the truth of reality through psychological bullshit. Almost had a Schopenhauer phase, but my Kant phase ended before I got there.
I don't know. I believe I can see everything just the way it is. Like if you were to read the first two paragraphs about immediate sense certainty from phenomenology of spirit and then stop. I don't believe in causality. Humean plus Heraclitean >Cratylus finally did not think it right to say anything but only moved his finger, and criticized Heraclitus for saying that it is impossible to step twice into the same river; for he thought one could not do it even once.
Oh wow that is the most tryhard while simultaneously completely wrong thing I've ever read. You sound like someone who watched one Youtube video on philosophy and decided you know better than other people.
because immediately after I read it I related everything else I read or perceived directly to it and then grew out of it by realizing that there are other ideas and world views
hm, i don't think many boys do that. i think it's probably a subset of boys with a relatively specific personality type, or rather a subset with a cluster of personality types.
i think the average 16 year old boys is going to base their personality on somebody like elon musk or pewdiepie or something, idk.
I had a dream that I was bald in the way the first pic is last night.
It actually woke me up in the middle of the night, and I had to touch my hair to confirm it was still full and lush before going back to sleep.
The average youth is way too intoxicated on his cellphone to ever take someone like Schopenhauer or Nietzsche seriously.
At best they'll vaguely understand Marx to mean "wow society actually sucks because rich peoples" and Aurelius to mean that the key to success in life is just mental fortitude and resilience.
I based my personality off of Spiderman. Luke Skywalker. Stuff like that.
Later in life I found socialism (not Marx) and Nietzsche. I don’t base my life off of them. I have based my life off of me being a hero.
These memes aren't funny.
I'm bored of men and women trying to categorise the spectrum of possible personalities. I'm bored with categorisation in general, just shut up.
But an entire generation of young men turned 16 and based their personality on the lobster, genuinely. We are still feeling the repercussions of this. Some never recovered.
16 year olds don’t even know who any of these are except Marx because they aren’t taught about in school (probably because they don’t map onto a political party and therefore don’t help kids become “good” citizens)
No, not really.
How the frick do they eat or drink with that beard
being messy dirty boys
Put the food in your mouth and not your chin
Their beards act like baleen; they're filter feeders.
Looks like a woman posted that. Why are there no women philosophers?
Lack of introspection
No. Women have been historically underrepresented in most intellectual fields and had fewer academic opportunities precisely because of prejudice like this
It's usually poor induction to go with conspiracy theories over a simpler explanation which is more probable. But I guess poor induction is a given with femoids.
Do you really think that half of humanity would be lacking in a fundamental human trait?
My cat is a good hunter, but he prefers staying at home and eating what I give him.
You oppress, enslave, and subjugate your cat. Nice analogy moron.
The window is open all the time, he can choose to come and go when he wishes. If he wanted to live somewhere else, there'd be nothing to stop him doing so either.
>le free will in 2022
You could also use a window, the higher the better
women also were more likely to die younger from giving birth, and by large are not concerned with masculine pursuits like philosophy over childrearing. This persists to this day so it’s not like medical advancements and birth control helped liberate women all that much, it seems to have solidified their decisions to pursue brainless shit anyway.
I see that you’ve not met a woman for the past few decades.
>do you really think that there is such a thing as sexual dimorphism?
Yes.
Pick a fight with 20727307 then.
How do you explain the statistical outliers? Have you personally won 2 Nobel prizes in 2 scientific fields as a male? Have you, as a member of the “more introspective” sex, written the world’s first novel?
>How do you explain the statistical outliers?
Various combination of genes combined with different expressions of them based on environment
Not like IQfygay would even bother to understand any of this
>women
>human
Women are the original human, dipshit.
You could try giving a shit about something other than yourselves. That would be a good start.
>women lack introspection
>no, now that women have been given a voice we actually know that it's because of exterior stuff
Like pottery
So by defending "women have poor induction" we end up at "women have no free will". There's also "men actively prevent women from doing anything" but that would mean men can at the same time do stuff and prevent women from doing stuff, and we're back to either women being inferior to men on these points, or women liking/accepting the current situation, or women having no free will.
I won't pretend that I have the answer, but there's something going on here
Whatever cope you have to tell your incel self.
i can guarantee a smelly neckbeard redditor made and posted that
Who cares. Not an answer.
don't care, no woman has ever posted that
There are, but they're all shit because the only women who would bother with philosophy are the infertile ones, which means they have hangups.
It's more Jefferson for me tbh.
Just because I too am a ginger geek wanting some negress strange.
Schopenhauer - based
Nietzsche - semi-based
Marx - cringe
Aurelius - semi-cringe
Scale, from I have read to I have argued about
Marx isn't worth arguing about, because he is cringe. With Aurelius there is nothing to argue about to begin with.
Marx is the single most important thinker of our era. Deal with eat. He anticipated the TRPF, which is happening right now, in 2022.
>Deal with eat
I’ll deal with all the eating that communists don’t
Why does every philosopher look like super villain?
It’s because they’re white
>One
You have no soul unless you base your personality off at minimum all four.
my marcus aurelius phase was when I was 14. read meditations twice then grew out of it. Never had a Nietzsche phase, hated him because I was christcuck, then hated him because I was a moral nihilist and I saw him as trying to escape the truth of reality through psychological bullshit. Almost had a Schopenhauer phase, but my Kant phase ended before I got there.
Which phase are you in now?
mostly sucking dick and trying to psych myself up to anal, if I like anal enough I may become gay but still just experimenting
Hot, we need a chart for books about the psychology of bottoming/being submissive
I don't know. I believe I can see everything just the way it is. Like if you were to read the first two paragraphs about immediate sense certainty from phenomenology of spirit and then stop. I don't believe in causality. Humean plus Heraclitean
>Cratylus finally did not think it right to say anything but only moved his finger, and criticized Heraclitus for saying that it is impossible to step twice into the same river; for he thought one could not do it even once.
You sound like a homosexual.
don't care
Oh wow that is the most tryhard while simultaneously completely wrong thing I've ever read. You sound like someone who watched one Youtube video on philosophy and decided you know better than other people.
just know you're wrong.
How do you grow out of a book c**t
because immediately after I read it I related everything else I read or perceived directly to it and then grew out of it by realizing that there are other ideas and world views
I was in a mathematics phase
help me get out of it
hm, i don't think many boys do that. i think it's probably a subset of boys with a relatively specific personality type, or rather a subset with a cluster of personality types.
i think the average 16 year old boys is going to base their personality on somebody like elon musk or pewdiepie or something, idk.
For me, it's Kierkegaard.
I had a dream that I was bald in the way the first pic is last night.
It actually woke me up in the middle of the night, and I had to touch my hair to confirm it was still full and lush before going back to sleep.
I doubt anyone would take a female philosopher seriously up until very recently.
The average youth is way too intoxicated on his cellphone to ever take someone like Schopenhauer or Nietzsche seriously.
At best they'll vaguely understand Marx to mean "wow society actually sucks because rich peoples" and Aurelius to mean that the key to success in life is just mental fortitude and resilience.
Noticeably the men are all Europeans. What does it tell us?
It tells us that this is a western dominated board where these people are particularly well known
>3 of them are G*rmans
Their iqs are likely over 85?
I based my personality off of Spiderman. Luke Skywalker. Stuff like that.
Later in life I found socialism (not Marx) and Nietzsche. I don’t base my life off of them. I have based my life off of me being a hero.
I don't like any of these
I read a little Nietzsche at 16 but not enough to ‘base my whole personality off of’.
These memes aren't funny.
I'm bored of men and women trying to categorise the spectrum of possible personalities. I'm bored with categorisation in general, just shut up.
Ha ha, as an ESFP and a Virgo with just a dash of Ravenclaw, I can totally relate.
for me it was pythagoras
Andrew Tate chad reporting
I was the depressed Schopie pseud. Then I actually read Kant and stopped being one.
But an entire generation of young men turned 16 and based their personality on the lobster, genuinely. We are still feeling the repercussions of this. Some never recovered.
>haha boys are so dumb for following some of the most influential systematic thinkers in history
>Any thoughts?
About what?
When I was 16 I based my whole personality off of Kurt Cobain, my orc female warrior and jerking off to Heather Locklear.
> weird-hair grumpy guy
who?
>mustache man
who?
>old guy
I don't know
>statue
don't care
shut up
16 year olds don’t even know who any of these are except Marx because they aren’t taught about in school (probably because they don’t map onto a political party and therefore don’t help kids become “good” citizens)
16 year old boys? How is Rand absent?
the image says boys, not femboys
Who the frick bases their personality on Schopenhauer? (At any age, but especially at 16 kek)