Are there any books that are unapologetically colonialist?
 It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
 |
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
Are there any books that are unapologetically colonialist?
Are there any books that are unapologetically colonialist?
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
|
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
First list a reason you want to know that isn‘t either to win an argument online or to assuage an internal sense of wrongdoing.
He fricking hates Indians
because whites make the best societies and nonwhites ruin them
America would be shit and oversocialized with or without Black folk.
No we just need to get rid of you
Irish farmers dying enmasse disagree
The famine was genocide. And by what "meme magic" are we not white?
>whites
You mean Traditional Catholics
America was founded by protestants and perfected by atheists.
> perfected by atheists
Ruined by atheists
Christcuck alert.
Cuckoldry is sexual immorality, that's what atheists are into, especially digital cuckoldry (porn). You're just a projecting cumbrain incapable of intelligent discourse and you throw a tantrum like a child every time you're reminded of Jesus Christ.
NT literally teaches us that cuckoldry is good if it's by god's will
Take your meds schizo.
>pictured: what happens when schizos don't take their meds
It's funny how you can't hardly tell the difference between how sin-loving, God hating atheists "debate" and how antichrist Catholics "debate".
The atheists of today will complain if you don't use their "preferred pronouns" just as the catholics will complain if you don't use their "preferred nouns/verbs" to describe their idolatry and sins and false doctrines. They don't even try to debate you either, because they have no arguments against God's Word (which their traditions and rituals violate).
>It's funny how you can't hardly tell the difference between how sin-loving, God hating atheists "debate" and how antichrist Catholics "debate".
It's also funny how it's often a Roman Catholic who will heckle street preachers that are fulfilling the great commission (which the Pope says not to do) and the Roman Catholic will get huge rounds of applause from a crowd that's been cheering for sin and blaspheming God and Jesus Christ for hours and they won't even realize how that's a concerning thing. Roman Catholicism gets along with the world so easily because it's of the world.
Luke 6:26 Woe unto you, when all men shall speak well of you! for so did their fathers to the false prophets.
Did pastor Jeb tell you this at the revival tent?
The roman catholic church and its jesuits are destroying America.
Indulgences aren't a thing anymore, but all Christianity sucks and has flaws. All Abrahamic religions suck, especially Judaism and Islam.
>destroying America
Thank God, curses to the great satan
>Protie understanding of Catholicism is stuck in the indulgence fiasco era
Unsurprising
Incredibly cringe and LARPy, and I say that as a practicing Catholic
Whites actually make shit societies that end up being controlled by israelites. Whites made good societies only when they copied Meds but this didn't last long
>Meds
All the big Med societies were made by Indo-European tribes from the north, which is classical Greco-Roman texts are full of bright-haired and bright-eyed people
>ESL poster
>we wuzzin
Go back to Mexico you disgusting spic
which is why*
I'm sorry your brain can't fill in the gap.
uno taco por favor
He’s clearly a snowBlack person and a /misc/tard. No one else points that out but race obsessed wewuzzers.
>meds and nordics are a race
You newbies are so incredibly moronic.
?
Yes, and this makes it obscene to want to ingratiate yourself among nonwhites. Seeking the rationale for doing this, especially when no serious application thereof is in the remote throes of existence, reeks of extremely online self-justification and self-inflating grandeur.
Case in point. If I tipped over every wheelchair and took first prize at the special olympics so I could hand over the shiny trinkets to an effete aristocracy I would be deeply ashamed of myself.
I am not ashamed of victory.
you're a sausage fingered american
/misc/ moment. You're not edgy, kid.
have a nice day Black person.
"Prisoners of Geography" mentions histories of major states very briefly, just laying out the facts. It doesn't really give a shit about what happened to natives.
Gulliver's Travels. Highly recommend it not only for being a good book, but also for being on topic for you.
***Robinson Crusoe
my bad, although the former is also a good book.
Crusoe is basically about killing and exploiting brown people for epic profits.
the memoirs of the conquistador bernal diaz
>modern ideas of sanitation
lol aztecs were cleaner and even had rudimentary dental hygiene. Spaniards carried diseases and filthy practices.
Indus Valley Civilization too held hygiene in high regard
Why did you modify the original template, this meme is awful.
Putting the VTuber on this image to appeal to zoomers is the IQfy equivalent to a company putting rainbows on their stuff during pride month.
>implying
Catholics needs to frick outta Christianity pronto
prots arent Christian
There is a cure, its called a reconquista
Pray the rosary everyday
and remember protestants are not Christian not even so called "non denominational Christians" who think they are not protestants, they are not Christian either. Convert to Traditional Catholicism the one true faith and reject the novus ordo and vatican II. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MxZoc_JhQtw
Roman catholicism and praying to anyone other than the Father (e.g. Mary and the "patron saints") goes against the Scripture, it's an npc religion where they blindly trust "the experts" (the priests/bishops) even if their teaching goes against Gods Word. It's like they want to have Mary or their "patron saints" manipulate Jesus on their behalf instead of simply obeying God's commandments and what Christ taught.
braindead pr*t seethe
Marx, The British Rule in India
Kim by Rudyard Kipling
Catholics and Orthodox may come across as larping pseuds on the internet, but protestants come across as schizophrenics who've just recently regained their freedom after an extended stay in the nut house.
Protestant Americans are the ones who created the crazy right wing Christian stereotype. Evangelicals are fat Walmart morons who fall for Joel Olsteen. It's a stereotype and not every protestant is like that, but their stereotype is the quintessential fat and stupid American that the world knows.
> Whiteness was associated with femininity. Aristophanes’ Thesmophoriazeusae 191-192 has Euripides criticising Agathon as λευκος (white), γυναικοφωνος (woman-voiced), and ‘απαλος (soft). His Ecclesiazeusae 428 similarly has a young man described as λευκος proposing that women should rule the city. Xenophon’s Hellenica 3.4.19 records Spartan soldiers, on seeing that their enemies are λευκος, deciding that fighting against them would be ει γυναιξι δεοι μαχεσθαι (like having to fight women). Euripides’ Bacchae 457 has Pentheus describe Dionysus as λευκος, and also ουκ αμορφος […] ‘ως ες γυναικας (not ill-formed […] as unto women, 453-4). The association is quite consistent.
> Meanwhile, Aristotle’s Politics makes a ‘golden mean’ argument about geography and ethnicity, if not precisely skin colour, claiming that Europeans and people living in cold places are θυμοῦ μέν ἐστι πλήρη, διανοίας δὲ ἐνδεέστερα καὶ τέχνης (‘full of courage but lacking in intelligence and skill’), and thus are too disorganised to conquer their neighbours, whilst Asians are διανοητικὰ μὲν καὶ τεχνικὰ τὴν ψυχήν, ἄθυμα δέ (‘intelligent and skilful, but without courage’, Politics 7, 1327b), and that Greeks occupy the perfect mean between the two and thus have intelligence, skill, and courage. Pale-skinned northern Europeans, then, he represents as inferior.
> As with Ancient Egyptians, Mycenaean Greeks and Minoans generally depicted women with pale or white skin and men with dark brown or tanned skin. As a result, men with pale or light skin, leukochrōs (λευκόχρως, "white-skinned") could be considered weak and effeminate by Ancient Greek writers such as Plato and Aristotle.
> White skin was so strongly associated with women that Aristotle felt compelled to offer a biological explanation: women lose so much blood during menstruation, that it makes them pale.
> The examples given in LSJ indicate that leukos, meaning "white-skinned" (entries II.b and c), is "a sign of youth and beauty" (II.b) when applied to women, but means "weakly, womanish" (II.c) when applied to men.
> Furthermore, Agathon's effeminate good looks feature white skin (leukos, 191). Stehle notes that "His mask was probably white, the standard type for an effete male in Aristophanes"
> In Xenophon pale skin comes to signify 'physical debilitation,'
> Aristophanes’s schema is simple and essentialist: white skin = woman, tan skin = man, and suggesting the opposite = comedy.
>never going outside and touching grass makes you a pale weakling with poor muscle tone
>anon thinks this means ypipo bad or something
> anon thinks this means ypipo bad or something
Projection
Any historical account written before 1913 should be a straightforward account of Whites kicking ass.
Jews took control of the money supply in 1913 and that's when the poz began and the 'racism bad!' became a thing. Anti-Racism became a new religion.
Nonwhites have since ran with that straw israelites have given them to whine about.
>abolition
>civil war
>white man's burden
>suffragettes
R*ghtoids employ all the anti-colonial arguments in support of Russia and against Western involvement in the conflict, but then turn around and be pro-imperialism when it comes to past events that don't matter anymore. Better leave the defence of the West to real men.
No one mentioned the Right. Why are you throwing an incel tantrum about them? Tough time at school? Parents ignoring you?
Get some fricking therapy for your anger issues instead if being a future school shooter.
Pro-colonial attitudes are right wing. School shooters are right wing loners mostly. This is a LULZ thread.
have a nice day, this is a pol site
There”s a containment board for /misc/tards. Such filth belongs there.
>No one mentioned the Right.
This is a right wing board on a right wing website about defending colonialism, which is a right wing position. Which means you are either playing dumb or you are a moron yourself. I don't think you are a r*ghtoid as you sound too passive aggressive and submissive for that.
it's amazing this is controversial. Any fairminded reading of history will reveal the colonized nations benefited from technologies and genetic admixture they wouldn't have had prior to conquest. I don't know any any specific book that has collected all the information but you can easily see improvements in lifespan and health data once you start looking at general histories
This has to be bait.
I read multiple books on Indian history a while ago. The statistical evidence clearly shows lifespans went up. The British Industrialized India, built railroads and funded mechanical loom projects. The hand-loom industry would never have been competitive in the long term with Industrial Britain, India today benefits from the legacy of British Institutions and their ruling class was entirely english-educated. I've looked into Africa in a cursory way and found similar pieces of evidence
pol runs this site
in 1700? Are you insane?
African admixture with whites clearly raised their intelligence in North America
Are you European? Of European descent?
What if we helped them with technologies and healthcare without enslaving or exploiting them
What if we invested billions and billions of dollars in resources over hundreds of years and receiving even more expenses in return
that's modern africa, an objectively much worse place than colonial africa
>strong genes benefit from weak genes
lmao
You could just answer OP's question instead of shitposting and falseflagging all day. It takes about a minute of being human.
>go on an odyssean journey halfway across the world
>your house is still your house after you return
It's actually insane how little appreciation people show for the logistics involved in these feats.
read translations of original documents
https://archive.org/details/firstthreeenglis00arberich/page/128/mode/2up
>The kinges of thefe regions (whom they caul Chiacones, as they of Hifpaniola caule theym Cacici) beinge certified of the comminge of owre men, fente certeyne fpyes to enquire what newe nation was arryued in theyr coafles, what they browght, and what they woolde haue : and in the meane tyme fumyffhed a number of theyr Canoas (whiche they caule Chichos) with men armed after their maner. For they were not a lyde afloniffhed to beholde owre fhippes with the fayles fpreade, wheras they vfe no fayles, nor can vfe but fmaule ons if they woolde, by reafon of the narownes of theyr canoas. Swarmynge therfore aboute the fhippe with theyr canoas (which we may well caule Morwxyla, bycaufe they are made of one hole tree,) they feared not to fhute at owr men beinge yet within their fhips and keepinge theym felues vnder the hatches as fafely as yf they had byn defended with flone waules. But when owre men had fhotte of certeyne pieces of ordinance ageynfl theym they were foo difcomfited with the noyfe and flawghter therof that they droue them felues to flight. Beinge thus difparcled, owr men chafed them with the fhippe bote, tooke many, and flewe many. When the kynges harde the noyfe of the gunnes, and were certyfied of the lofTe of their men, they fent ambafadours to Vincentius Agnes to entreate of peace, fearinge the fpoyle of theyr goodes and deflruction of theyr people, if owre men fhulde coomme alande in theyr wrathe and furye. They defyred peace therfore, as could bee coniectured by their fignes and poyntinges. For owre men vnderfloode not one woorde of theyr language. And for the better proofe that they defired peace, they prefented owre men with three thoufand of thofeweights of gold that theSpanyardes caule CaJlellanumAureum, which they commonly caule Pefum.
what do you think guys
>read translations of original documents
IS THAT A PRIMARY SOURCE NOT PUT INTO IT'S "PROPER CONTEXT" BY A COMMENTATOR?
AAAAAAAAAAAAAA SAVE ME ANTI-WHITEMAN
King Solomon's mines
>be trad African with a family
>anglo israelites invade your nation
>you have to circumcise your penis and think that a man in a wig is a woman because the anglo israelites say so
>this le okay because eh… some homosexuals on IQfy say so
That happened before the modern stuff. Northern Europe already got conquered by Christianity. Europeans don't have their original culture and everyone just believes and relishes in the descriptions of our people by Meds. Northern Europeans were already in a similar position just less recent than these browns/blacks.
Everyone is just blinded by muh white people bad to see it.
If you are pro-colonialism you are also pro globalization because it was a direct precursor.