Philosophy is moronic. There, I said it, and I’ve saved you countless hours of mental masturbation to free you up to physically jerk off instead. You’re welcome, now get to work
No. Even Erasmus just threw in the towel and said it isn't even important. He even went so far as to say that people who care about the question of Free Will are irreligious, and the question of Free Will itself is "curious and superfluous."
Free will doesn't need arguments. Free will is a fact I'm experiencing every day. It is self-evident to any non-NPC. Just like consciousness, space, time or existence doesn't require arguments.
Free Will does not mean freedom of choice. Read The Bondage of the Will.
See, I have set before you today life and prosperity, death and adversity. If you obey the commandments of the Lord your God that I am commanding you today, by loving the Lord your God, walking in his ways, and observing his commandments, decrees, and ordinances, then you shall live and become numerous, and the Lord your God will bless you in the land that you are entering to possess. But if your heart turns away and you do not hear but are led astray to bow down to other gods and serve them, I declare to you today that you shall certainly perish; you shall not live long in the land that you are crossing the Jordan to enter and possess. I call heaven and earth to witness against you today that I have set before you life and death, blessings and curses. Choose life so that you and your descendants may live, loving the Lord your God, obeying him, and holding fast to him, for that means life to you and length of days, so that you may live in the land that the Lord swore to give to your ancestors, to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob
>arguments for free will
the real discusssion is not "for/against" free will but what would it even mean to have or not have free will, and perhaps a separate discussion of why this "feels like" an important issue.
Free will doesn't need arguments. Free will is a fact I'm experiencing every day. It is self-evident to any non-NPC. Just like consciousness, space, time or existence doesn't require arguments.
all subject object relations start with the subject. the denial of free will is redundant because any appreciation of, or effect on, the system begins with the act of observation from the subject.
Its fine to say that x or y probably caused you to choose something, but any appreciation of that fact is done from the position of the observer as its logical start point. You can even say that other people dont have free will since they are external entities (objects), within a system that seems regular in its processes, a cut leads to a yell of pain. You can do the former to illicit the later like adding water to put out a fire. But as the entity considering this, the consideration is the starting point of any reality to begin with. your method of apprehension, your choice, comes before any sort of determination can be made.
You seeing a circle or cylinder comes before in logical steps then there actually being a circle or cylinder in a supposed true reality.
>Are there any good arguments for free will?
Your own intuition. >imagine experiencing free will all day every day yet still you reject it because some nerds told you to
Pathetic.
that's because you are moronic
Nope, this little israeli homie was right as always.
/thread
you're determined to believe it
but yeah kant'a practical philosophy should also be considered
spinoza's psychology is good, his metaphysics completely bogus
>spinoza's psychology is good, his metaphysics completely bogus
the psychology necessarily follows from the metaphysics.
Philosophy is moronic. There, I said it, and I’ve saved you countless hours of mental masturbation to free you up to physically jerk off instead. You’re welcome, now get to work
Gonna need a helping hand from you though, beat me off like you did to your uncle when you were eight
Why do people write things like this. I feel like it is some ESL shill/ bot program to lower the level of discourse and atmosphere
No. Even Erasmus just threw in the towel and said it isn't even important. He even went so far as to say that people who care about the question of Free Will are irreligious, and the question of Free Will itself is "curious and superfluous."
He also led to the reformation
brutally incorrect
Just like you and your mother, OP. Spinoza was a nihilist.
Yes, read Leibniz
Yes, free will just means freedom of choice.
Free Will does not mean freedom of choice. Read The Bondage of the Will.
>Free Will does not mean freedom of choice.
I never said it was. And I don't follow the Torah.
>Read The Bondage of the Will.
It is quite disappointing that this title is not a BDSM erotic novel.
>Free will: The power of acting without the constraint of necessity or fate; the ability to act at one's own discretion.
Read books.
https://ia800406.us.archive.org/16/items/b28149294/b28149294.pdf
See, I have set before you today life and prosperity, death and adversity. If you obey the commandments of the Lord your God that I am commanding you today, by loving the Lord your God, walking in his ways, and observing his commandments, decrees, and ordinances, then you shall live and become numerous, and the Lord your God will bless you in the land that you are entering to possess. But if your heart turns away and you do not hear but are led astray to bow down to other gods and serve them, I declare to you today that you shall certainly perish; you shall not live long in the land that you are crossing the Jordan to enter and possess. I call heaven and earth to witness against you today that I have set before you life and death, blessings and curses. Choose life so that you and your descendants may live, loving the Lord your God, obeying him, and holding fast to him, for that means life to you and length of days, so that you may live in the land that the Lord swore to give to your ancestors, to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob
>arguments for free will
the real discusssion is not "for/against" free will but what would it even mean to have or not have free will, and perhaps a separate discussion of why this "feels like" an important issue.
if this post is what i think it is... all of my seethe
no you have to fight for it, but usually it requires other people. if you are a big brain you can argument with other objects, but risk losing.
Free will doesn't need arguments. Free will is a fact I'm experiencing every day. It is self-evident to any non-NPC. Just like consciousness, space, time or existence doesn't require arguments.
no, one acts on wills mediated by the untraced receptivity of an *unwilled* will
all subject object relations start with the subject. the denial of free will is redundant because any appreciation of, or effect on, the system begins with the act of observation from the subject.
Its fine to say that x or y probably caused you to choose something, but any appreciation of that fact is done from the position of the observer as its logical start point. You can even say that other people dont have free will since they are external entities (objects), within a system that seems regular in its processes, a cut leads to a yell of pain. You can do the former to illicit the later like adding water to put out a fire. But as the entity considering this, the consideration is the starting point of any reality to begin with. your method of apprehension, your choice, comes before any sort of determination can be made.
You seeing a circle or cylinder comes before in logical steps then there actually being a circle or cylinder in a supposed true reality.
Mechanisms for how free will could exist scientifically:
>Mechanisms for how free will could exist scientifically
>Mechanism
>Of free will
._.
?si=w6HQPDDQncURiBQd
>Are there any good arguments for free will?
Your own intuition.
>imagine experiencing free will all day every day yet still you reject it because some nerds told you to
Pathetic.
Truth
what if my intuition is that my life is predetermined
Then you're a p zombie
i dont feel free i do the same shit every day despite not wanting to
That's because its self-inflicted
People be arguing for years for or against free will yet no one really agrees upon what we mean by free will.
it is if you say it is, and it is not if you do not.
Thought isn't an automatic process