Are you smarter than an undergrad studying the immune system?

Are you smarter than an undergrad studying the immune system?

Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68

Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68

Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68

  1. 3 years ago
    Anonymous

    Do viruses actually exist or are Lanka and all the rest of the growing number right that there is not actual proof?

  2. 3 years ago
    Anonymous

    but why do the scientists who actually research vaccines refuse to acknowledge natural immunity

    • 3 years ago
      Anonymous

      That's more bureaucratic than scientific.

      • 3 years ago
        Anonymous

        What do you mean?

    • 3 years ago
      Anonymous

      lol because natural immunity is literally full body health and if we start learning the immune system it trickles into discovering how literally everything you're being fed is a subtle poison

      "safe levels!" yeah, over the course of your life, mixed with a thousand other poisons at "safe levels"

      • 3 years ago
        Anonymous

        that's not how poisoning works, schizo

  3. 3 years ago
    Anonymous

    >type the questions into google
    >get the answers
    >my "research" is now on par with """scientists""" who actually research vaccines

  4. 3 years ago
    Anonymous

    Immunologists say my body is full of virgin killer T cells and yet I'm still typed this comment. Biology is a Marxist pseudoscience.

  5. 3 years ago
    Anonymous

    >undergrad
    >information learned in A & P

  6. 3 years ago
    Anonymous

    guess how i know you're an ameriBlack person

  7. 3 years ago
    Anonymous

    It's not just about biology, it's about politics. Even if all the biology is correct, if they feed you the wrong assumptions, your reasoning based on those assumptions will be wrong. Anyways many of the antivaxx assumptions are unfounded anyways, but normies should not blindly TRUST THE SCIENCE. They should question statements they're told by looking for contradictions, always finding sources of sources, revising their derivations when the statements they're based on are changed, don't blindly trust journals which are prone to corruption, etc

  8. 3 years ago
    Anonymous

    Irrelevant. You don't need to know anything about biology to know when you're being subjected to yet another propaganda campaign.

  9. 3 years ago
    Anonymous

    >be midwit
    >study biology
    >dunning-kruger kicks in
    >think you're competent enough to verify and corroborate the official narrative
    >be surrounded by other gullible midwits all toeing the party line
    >become highly biased
    >spout moronic opinions based on your false sense of expertise

    Vs.

    >be intelligent
    >know nothing about biology
    >learn to recognize propaganda, corruption and political manipulation
    >see it
    >call it out

  10. 3 years ago
    Anonymous

    person below has an even more inflated sense of false expertise considering they have zero knowledge about biology

  11. 3 years ago
    Anonymous

    >multiple choice questions
    I'm white, I don't need hints to answer any of these

  12. 3 years ago
    Anonymous

    frick this is my favorite game!!!

  13. 3 years ago
    Anonymous
  14. 3 years ago
    Anonymous

    > Implying diseases are caused by viruses

    • 3 years ago
      Anonymous

      some are, yes. crazy I know.

  15. 3 years ago
    Anonymous

    i got "A" for all of them. what's my score?

  16. 3 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Basic undergraduate biology trivia means that the basic statistics of PCR test selectivity and sensitivity are invalid
    You're right at the top of the bell curve, bud :')

  17. 3 years ago
    Anonymous

    lets make a deal, if i answer every single question correctly you will call me the king of scientists and you will do whatever i say no matter how absurd it sounds

  18. 3 years ago
    Anonymous

    >IL-4
    >lgA
    >HLA Class II
    >NF-xB
    >CD44
    >lgD
    >IL-10

    Seriously? Couldn't those homosexual scientists come up with better names?

    • 3 years ago
      Anonymous

      >IL-4
      >IL-10

      • 3 years ago
        Anonymous

        Nice.

  19. 3 years ago
    Anonymous

    A randomly selected educated person can make policy decisions just as well as a social "scientist."

  20. 3 years ago
    Anonymous

    Tell you the truth I'd like to see an epidemiologist having a go at this.
    >epidemiologist in our faculty was interviewed and bemoaned how certain parts of the department act like bullies and trolls
    >meanwhile she posts alarmist bullshit against every policy that comes out which gets proved wrong time and time again when nothing bad happens

    t. biochemist

  21. 3 years ago
    Anonymous

    Imagine being such a braindead branch of STEM that you can ctrl+f the answers to "research" in a PDF of your textbook. That's why engineers are chads. You can have a textbook in front of you and it won't make a difference in understanding unless you sequentially work through the whole book and oftentimes one or two books before it.

    Obviously, this is why anybody can do their own research with biology and medicine while not needing to be able to regurgitate some part of a textbook via rote memorization. People successfully perform their own research on their own diseases all the time. I met a guy whose pyloric sphincter was fused or nearly fused shut at birth and his mom figured it out before the doctors.

  22. 3 years ago
    Anonymous

    Pop quizzes are fricking moronic. Case study exams are where it's fricking at. Every time we are requested to do exams I leave extremely negative student feedback.
    Only moronic teachers that don't understand the content give their students quizzes instead of thinking up case studies and grading students based on their thought process in real world situations.

    • 3 years ago
      Anonymous

      if you give oral exams, the class average will drop by at least 20%, which means that they know nothing off the tops of their heads

      • 3 years ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah no fricking shit. You can't just prop up the question "What is adermayoglyphia" which is a question I got in an oral genetics exam. We were told a funny story about this genetic disorder (adermayoglyphia) in week 2 and for some reason we were meant to remember this and remember exactly how it's caused? We were not even given hints as to whether it was autosomal dominant. At least with that information I could explain how it is caused.
        Oral exams are moronic in undergraduate med degrees.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *