Be honest, is the Out of Africa theory true?
 CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
 Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
Be honest, is the Out of Africa theory true?
Be honest, is the Out of Africa theory true?
CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
You do realize there were the Homoerectus and the Neanderthals, including the cro magnon, yes? Yes it's true but there's a bigger story to it.
We're talking about homosexual Sapiens here. Nevermind the fact that the ancestor of all Homos is from Africa anyway (but of course some descendant species evolved from pre-sapien migrants outside of Africa like the Neanderthals).
yes, and it causes near-infinite amounts of seethe.
A* is found in non-African populations with zero african admixture.
You can't be this dumb, right? Why do you think no other haplogroup is associated with SSA admixture, or any admixture at all despite all diverging from the same source?
R1a is found in Cambodians with zero EHG admixture.
>All fossil and genetic evidence points to it
What do you think?
White racists desperately want it to be false because the "w-we are more evolved!" cope doesn't work.
How are whites not more evolved? White civilization is like a BBC compared to apefrica
>the cherry-picking cope
kek
Africa = Black
this is your rotten brain in propaganda. The out of Africa theory is fake because it is, simple as. The only excuse why the theory even exists it to justify the "anti-racism" policy. But assuming that the theory is real, then it also implies that it happens millions of years ago meaning the racial division of today didnt exist back then and the division now only exists because of evolution which then makes things worse for blacks because it's as if they barely evolved. So no matter how you see this it's morons like you who look stupid. But the average npc doesnt have the intellect nor the time to think like this.
Mutations can accrue really quickly under selective pressure. Various dog breeds were created in just hundreds of years. Whitoid mutations light blonde hair and blue eyes are supposed to have appeared recently, just tens of thousands of years ago.
>be honest
As if I'd have a clue. Idk let the samples talk, my guess? Not necessarily, I guess we'll see.
Ok, enough israeli pilpul, release the ancient Aryan ayys
yea but i think everyone immigrated fairly early
schizophrenic language....
Well *my* social worldview is based on where the first fish walked on land in Pangaea
It's not true because I hate Black folk.
Laughing out loud, Humans spread out of Africa, Black folk stayed there, laughing my ass off, *laughingcrying emoji*
Why did so many humans decide to leave Africa?
>so many
It was very few actually, they just bred more given they had more resources.
This is the only correct answer
There's denisovans and other things, the out of Africa hypothesis is only vaguely correct
>I don't know what OOA even is yet I'm going to give my shitty opinion about it anyways
He's right though, why should the origin of homosexual Sapiens necessarily be in Africa and not somewhere else?
>I don't know what OOA even is yet I'm confident enough to double down in my ignorance
>not an argument
Ok enlighten me then Mr. Smart Guy, what is OOA if not the emergence of anatomically modern homosexual Sapiens in Africa? Why couldn't ypipo have come from Europe or somewhere else?
Read homosexual, google it.
I did. How does it differ from what I said?
You're conveniently excluding some parts homosexual, read it whole again.
Like what?
If I was in the middle east I'd get the frick out too.
Yes
It's true because the first homosexual sapiens arose in Africa, but any attempts to politicize it ("You shouldn't be racist because you wuz an African all along" and such) are going full moron, it was so long ago it shouldn't matter in the slightest to current human society.
Sure, but I don't get why you care about it. Is it because of muh we all are Africans people? Because it's only true in origin, but difference is that some remained in Africa while others (your ancestors) left.
>some (his ancestors) remained in Africa while others left
ftfy
Yeah, but the point is that there is a difference between you and some African (because I assume this shit matter mostly because of politics - to allow refugees and migrants because muh we all from Africa), made by the fact itself that some of your ancestors left Africa.
This really, objecting to OoA for non-factual reasons is just silly. Like what's wrong, does it trigger people than some of their ancestors might have been walking around Africa 200k years ago? Does it blow their mind that fellow human-looking primates could be distantly related to them? Ridiculous.
Wait... so you're saying all of humanity emerged from a Garden of Eden?
we came from noahs ark and spread from Anatolia into Africa, Europe and India
>humans are closely related to chimpanzees and gorillas
>chimpanzees and gorillas live in africa
How can Out of Africa not be true?
The idea isn't about archaic hominids (like Lucy), it's about whether the different races of homosexual Sapiens we have today all came from Africa or whether they developed independently for millions of years after homosexual Erectus first exited Africa. So the idea is homosexual Sapiens came out of Africa and populated the Earth (which was already populate by Neanderthals, Denisovans, and others), vs. homosexual Sapiens arose somewhere else.
>it's about whether the different races of homosexual Sapiens we have today all came from Africa or whether they developed independently for millions of years after homosexual Erectus first exited Africa
SSA's cluster closer to Eurasians than Neanderthals or any other homosexual species does, on top of the fact that we can trace every human's descent to Chromosomal Adam. So there's no way that the races "developed independently".
Source: labs run by israelites, using flaky statistical models.
Who's to say that the origin of homos was in Africa and not outside of it?
fossil record and genetic analysis, obviously
It's peer reviewed scientific studies, paleontological and genetic evidence against some blogspots. This is not a serious debate.
nope
we're LEAF
If you expect true and falso dichotomy, then you are interested in the wrong subject
If you want to know what's most likely, just consider the evidence
Did the ancestors of Eurasians(and all other non-Africans) migrate out of Africa before or after the Toba eruptions?
Not solid but it's the most solid theory by now.