Books about the negative consequences of the western feminist movements? In particular, pertaining to the effects of women joining the workforce en masse, and the importance of women as mothers and community builders
 |
 Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
|
Books about the negative consequences of the western feminist movements?
quran.com
I want to touch her face with my hands and my penis
Stfu coomer
The negative takeaway is that it was separated from the main socialist movement in the first place.
IDpol is a liberal plague meant to divide and keep the dum dums fight amongst themselves
Umm sweaty, this was debunked (:
sweatie! not sweaty you gay. bait better.
Jesus Christ this is egregiously moronic
How? Or is that your only input?
>ascribes the post-war economic boom in america where it was the only developed nation whose productive apparatus hadn't been bombed and working age population decimated to women getting the vote
That post is fantastically moronic, remarkable really.
sex with this
Can we stay on topic please.
made for
Me and my superior Aryan-Celtic genetics.
t. 6'2", >138 IQ, can bench 350, 7-fig networth, degree in eng phys which I don't use because that's gay and I'm self-employed. I became a landlord this year too. Oh and I smoke a pack a day. Evola and Guenon are my favourite authors, I switch between the two. Last year I read at least 60 books. If you're still in the big cities by October you are so fricked. Your savings will evaporate and you will be forced to sign up for the rationing cards that they will bring in, eventually tied in with CBDCs. Only rural chads will survive, which is why I've bought a giant plot of land and am developing cabins to rent out. I need multiple wives.
why are Traditionalists such chads?
I just made this up btw. I'm actually a neet considering becoming a troony.
>seething pooskin ankelbites the superior Aryan
typical
Cope and seethe.
>t. nonwhite who just got exposed falseflagging
or are you just too stupid to see how? how does it feel when women don't even see you as human?
Close the tab ahmed, you got destroyed.
>he didn't stack eth in 2016
>he missed link sub 50c
>not making 6 figures on dog coins during bullruns
>he can't into TA and fundamentals
this is why you're poor (and brown)
Eastern woman worked more than American women do now
CHUD ALERT
WARNING
CHUD ALERT
Who hurt you my friend
Principles that govern social interaction by Manhood Academy
I want to jerk off beside her face to near completion, upon which time I'd take my right hand, now soppy with precum, and use it to slick back her hair as I practice paradiddles upon it.
Talking about something in terms of 'positive and negative consequences' seems like disingenuous and lazy thinking.
There were many benefits to hunter gather societies, like leisure time and diet, that were lost with agriculture. Feudal societies gave many of its members a sense of purpose and meaning that was lost under capitalism. Emancipating slaves led to large operational losses for plantation owners who had used their labour.
Tallying up a list of arbitrarily assembled pros and cons doesn't give you meaningful knowledge. Actually understanding social changes means relating to them to the complex two-sided connection between power struggles on the one hand and the nature of freedom on the other. The reason you're anti-feminist is because of an implicit belief you have about that connection, not because of the particular effects feminism had on child care in 80s America.
If women want to destroy society just let them. Enjoy all the free sex they give out for no commitment requirements.
>Enjoy all the free sex
tell that to the incels
Are the incels in the room with you?
Paglia
Dave Sim.
>It would be difficult to say that anything today is more destructive than the elimination of half the workforce in the 1970s and 1980s, and the replacement of workers by their wives. The workplace conflicts were an inevitable result of the total mobilisation of women - and this does not take into account their necessity in 'soft power' propaganda and the move towards the humanitarian bureaucracies. Women are the essential face of neutralization, and are rightly its conservative force. The Human Resources departments replaced the unions, which were undermined by intelligence organisations. This was the end of the industrial society of the worker, and in his place we received nursemaids of administration and gossips of the intelligence state. It goes without saying that the conservative parties were at the forefront of this, and their strongest leader was a woman. "There is no society." This could not have been uttered by anyone but a woman.
>recommend books to convince me of what I already believe
why are people like this?