If you have two devices with the same name on the same network you won't be able to resolve their ip addresses. You'd have to connect via ip address directly. It's called name conflict. The device in question is marketed as an access point and router, of which you should theoretically be able to buy 250 pieces and have them run simultaneously. But without the ability to change host names it becomes pointless because you don't know which device is which unless you use external means. Enjoy your excel sheets.
Are the hostnames for these devices TP-Model#-last_X_digits_of serial#
It would practically be impossible to have duplicates, at most someone might buy 2 more of these if they have a big house and set them to AP mode. You essentially bought a minivan as a catch all solution but can't understand why it won't compete against a tesla in features.
Why not go buy a cheap ASA, 2960, and some AP's and do what you want?
You can't get full speeds with such a shit router, moron. What the frick are you doing on IQfy?
2 months ago
Anonymous
I get full ethernet speeds at least on my WR1043ND. Why wouldn't you get full speeds on the AC1750?
2 months ago
Anonymous
Not him but OpenWRT is historically shit on anything better than wireless N
Feel free to google "OpenWRT wireless issues" and you will see exactly what i'm talking about
2 months ago
Anonymous
wait. is this why my wlan sometimes dies for no reason which causes meltdown from my family until i reboot wlan manually? did i get memed?
2 months ago
Anonymous
do you now? go test it and post results
openwrt + cheap shit router = dogshit speeds (wifi, ethernet, wan vs lan doesn't matter you're gonna get GAPE SHIT speeds)
2 months ago
Anonymous
Considering overheads it's not bad.
2 months ago
Anonymous
Not him but OpenWRT is historically shit on anything better than wireless N
Feel free to google "OpenWRT wireless issues" and you will see exactly what i'm talking about
Most router operating systems are originally based on OpenWRT (once apron a time) but they put in a lot of hacks into the kernel network stack so it uses hardware acceleration. Vanilla OpenWRT doesn't have these vendor specific hacks regardless if they're open source or proprietary and must send all data through the kernels software network stack for LAN to WiFi to WAN. So your throughput is CPU bound which correlates to how expensive the router was.
2 months ago
Anonymous
But I already demonstrated I get full gigabit speeds across my LAN on my ancient TP-Link router.
2 months ago
Anonymous
the problem is the wifi, openwrt gets trash speeds. IDK if it's because openwrt uses open source drivers but the speeds are worse than stock firmware.
2 months ago
Anonymous
The stock firmware is trash, so I'll take OpenWRT over it.
The things that need high speed are plugged in.
zoomers cant read cursive. That is clearly a lowercase f, however it is a rather swoopy one. No one who actually reads cursive would confuse that for an b, since the swoop is below the writing line.
2 months ago
Anonymous
Don't zoomers go to school now?
2 months ago
Anonymous
I used to write that way too until I had to deal with a moronic professor who kept failing me all because he couldn't read cursive.
I ordered this mofo for my budget home network, hope it's good.
I considered TP-Link because of price but then I read that they open SSH port but you can't even connect, it's for some shit android app.
Asus is supposed to give an access to Unix-like shell by SSH. I bet their AsusWRT is based on OpenWRT.
>cheapest ceiling light >dildo
What a choice! I want the inwall.
Realistically I do not need this kind of enterprise stuff. Any affordable chink equivalents?
2 months ago
Anonymous
Unifi is not enterprise, its prosumer/soho. Granted that covers the majority of use cases. TP-Link has their Omada line which is similar, but I dont know about prices.
Everything is backdoored nowadays. Your only choice is to get a custom router with custom software (non-backdoored) and put everything suspicious behind it in quarantine.
>you can't even buy a second one even if you wanted
OP these auto config when they realize there is another one on the network and it reconfigures itself to bridge. I have the one you posted, the second one on the network will go into bridge mode and act as a switch/extender/AP mirroing the configs from the device that determines it has a public IP address to adhere to 1912 RFC standard.
Did you even read the manual?
also >need a router host name for something thats not even a prosumer device
Just why? Like seriously why do you need to change your routers hostname? Could just set up an alias and call it a day if it was that important
couldn't this be mitigated by separating out each component? small computer handles the routing and all your wireless needs are handled by wireless access points?
There's only one reason anyone would voluntarily buy a TP-Link router/ap/range extender and that is to flash OpenWRT.
These things are practically unbrickable because their bootloaders have a stupid simple tftp recovery mode and will accept any firmware you give it without complaining.
Change hostnames? I don't get it.
If you have two devices with the same name on the same network you won't be able to resolve their ip addresses. You'd have to connect via ip address directly. It's called name conflict. The device in question is marketed as an access point and router, of which you should theoretically be able to buy 250 pieces and have them run simultaneously. But without the ability to change host names it becomes pointless because you don't know which device is which unless you use external means. Enjoy your excel sheets.
>two devices with the same name on the same network
Change their names moron
>she can't memorize IP addresses
Multiple people with identical name and surname exist IRL and they work just fine
Not in the same room (network).
But they do exist in the same city
But you can't call out to them individually.
Ok. Call a random name now see how many show up.
how fricking stupid are you?
stop posting and stay in school
this is a home router. you are not supposed to run more than 1
tell that to my shitty mesh network
Are the hostnames for these devices TP-Model#-last_X_digits_of serial#
It would practically be impossible to have duplicates, at most someone might buy 2 more of these if they have a big house and set them to AP mode. You essentially bought a minivan as a catch all solution but can't understand why it won't compete against a tesla in features.
Why not go buy a cheap ASA, 2960, and some AP's and do what you want?
Updoot the firmware.
>teepeepeepoopoolink
Can install OpenWRT.
and get 12mbps over wifi5 ?
you mean 12mbps over ethernet?
No. Full speeds.
You can't get full speeds with such a shit router, moron. What the frick are you doing on IQfy?
I get full ethernet speeds at least on my WR1043ND. Why wouldn't you get full speeds on the AC1750?
Not him but OpenWRT is historically shit on anything better than wireless N
Feel free to google "OpenWRT wireless issues" and you will see exactly what i'm talking about
wait. is this why my wlan sometimes dies for no reason which causes meltdown from my family until i reboot wlan manually? did i get memed?
do you now? go test it and post results
openwrt + cheap shit router = dogshit speeds (wifi, ethernet, wan vs lan doesn't matter you're gonna get GAPE SHIT speeds)
Considering overheads it's not bad.
Most router operating systems are originally based on OpenWRT (once apron a time) but they put in a lot of hacks into the kernel network stack so it uses hardware acceleration. Vanilla OpenWRT doesn't have these vendor specific hacks regardless if they're open source or proprietary and must send all data through the kernels software network stack for LAN to WiFi to WAN. So your throughput is CPU bound which correlates to how expensive the router was.
But I already demonstrated I get full gigabit speeds across my LAN on my ancient TP-Link router.
the problem is the wifi, openwrt gets trash speeds. IDK if it's because openwrt uses open source drivers but the speeds are worse than stock firmware.
The stock firmware is trash, so I'll take OpenWRT over it.
The things that need high speed are plugged in.
I get 1gbps over WiFi with my shitty budget WiFi 6 router...
My r7800 on openwrt got 70mb/s over 80mhz wireless AC and my gl-mt6000 gets 135mb/s over 160mhz wireless AX
skill issue
openwrt flashed and itjustwerks™ almost 10 years old now maybe, it's the modern day wrt54g
Why is your f a b?
Looks like a nicely handwritten f for me.
zoomers cant read cursive. That is clearly a lowercase f, however it is a rather swoopy one. No one who actually reads cursive would confuse that for an b, since the swoop is below the writing line.
Don't zoomers go to school now?
I used to write that way too until I had to deal with a moronic professor who kept failing me all because he couldn't read cursive.
do it properly fuggalor
can anyone tell.me what it says on the paper? White folk can't write to save they lives
id jus works cuz
wypepo be makin they writins so hard to reed, justa keep a brudda down
It's not rocket science.
Works for me
18/03
2024/03/18
I bought this router the last time I moved, put openwrt and it works like a dream.
I ordered this mofo for my budget home network, hope it's good.
I considered TP-Link because of price but then I read that they open SSH port but you can't even connect, it's for some shit android app.
Asus is supposed to give an access to Unix-like shell by SSH. I bet their AsusWRT is based on OpenWRT.
if you can openwrt flash it you can close ssh or set it to keyfile login only
Come home white man
But I don't have a network cable on my fricking ceiling.
they have several other form factors
>cheapest ceiling light
>dildo
What a choice! I want the inwall.
Realistically I do not need this kind of enterprise stuff. Any affordable chink equivalents?
Unifi is not enterprise, its prosumer/soho. Granted that covers the majority of use cases. TP-Link has their Omada line which is similar, but I dont know about prices.
Everything is backdoored nowadays. Your only choice is to get a custom router with custom software (non-backdoored) and put everything suspicious behind it in quarantine.
If you don't use Ubiquity you aren't white, simple as. Go back to Mumbai Ranjeet
Enjoy your packet loss.
Yeah in India maybe, where the copper wire is made of cow dung
i love how Black folks like you are seething
>1948+76
>not using open source firmware on all your networking equipment
terminally NGMI
>you can't even buy a second one even if you wanted
OP these auto config when they realize there is another one on the network and it reconfigures itself to bridge. I have the one you posted, the second one on the network will go into bridge mode and act as a switch/extender/AP mirroing the configs from the device that determines it has a public IP address to adhere to 1912 RFC standard.
Did you even read the manual?
also
>need a router host name for something thats not even a prosumer device
Just why? Like seriously why do you need to change your routers hostname? Could just set up an alias and call it a day if it was that important
https://github.com/esnet/iperf
couldn't this be mitigated by separating out each component? small computer handles the routing and all your wireless needs are handled by wireless access points?
yes, which is the white man uses Unifi to do just that
>using ToiletPaperLink
There's only one reason anyone would voluntarily buy a TP-Link router/ap/range extender and that is to flash OpenWRT.
These things are practically unbrickable because their bootloaders have a stupid simple tftp recovery mode and will accept any firmware you give it without complaining.