>Chinese literature
>uses a samurai
>confuses Machiavelli with Dante
>misspelling «Karamazov»
>1984 unironically
Since when has literature discussion in online spaces been hijacked by these people?
 |
 DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
|
>Chinese literature. >uses a samurai. >confuses Machiavelli with Dante. >misspelling Karamazov
Plebs gonna pleb
Why do you care?
Why show me this?
They take themselves too seriously. And yet, why should one not be serious?
Ambitious fools we are. And yet, ambition is a godlike thought.
Judging by the use of Chad's and wojacks, I'd say this person hasn't read any of these books.
1984 and Brothers K seem out of place compared to the rest
Tirano y lo que surja?
Being perceived as a "reader" is good
Reading is boring tho
But let me tell you about the most DISTURBING book ever written. It's called BLOOD MERIDIAN and it has this character called THE JUDGE and bo-ho-ho-hoy did he scare the bazezus out of me
Yeah, he looks like the Joker. I haven't read it though.
It's Twitter. Twitter is for morons like you.
The Reddit Hexology
I would take Dialogues and put Blood meridian
>art of war
>a samurai wojak
That one genuinely made me cringe.
every young man should read Infect Your Friends and Loved Ones and Convenience Store Woman.
I remember one of these which used the CIV6 artwork for Atlas Shrugged
I mean why not, it’s a picture of Atlas.
What is the interconnected philosophy of Meditations, The Prince and The Brothers Karamazov. What links these books together in the redditor pseud mind
They're not woke. That's their thought proccess.
twitter pseud mind*
>brothers karamov
if first names have diminutives, why shouldn't last names as well?
How does someone this pedestrian end up with a 100k followers? How did they get their start? What exactly was it that made people notice them?
>Normie makes shit that appeals to normalgays
>normalgays eat it up
It's not rocket science, anon
Reminds me of the Captain Planet meme
>meditations
I am 100% certain this guy has never read meditations and 501024720274% certain he has never heard of Epictetus.
>pretending like 1984 isn't good just because it's well-known
i bet half you morons STILL haven't even read it.
It's good but it's not prescient masterpiece
I immediately look down on people who use basedjaks and wojaks
What did people post below that tweet? More midwittery?
Do people actually care if some normongrel or e-celeb posts about a book they read? No matter what happens the actual work will still be there for you to enjoy.
The Plato Chad is abomination. Philosophy is itself a dialogue, one conversing with the past, not just some demented contest for one man to prove himself the victor over another. This man is what you get when you don't treat philosophy holistically
>thinks 1984 is ironically unironically
>baiting for his Twitter this hard