Are you ready for the dual subjec/logic? Read Lacan. And Deleuze. Bateson's Ecology of Mind. Matte Blanco on Bi-Logic next. Graham Priest on dialetheism perhaps.
You read Gilchrist? Balanced, dance, juggle, left+right hand path!
Cassirer already explained the categories of the pre-Kantian mind and mythological thought decades before Jaynes, adding left-brain right-brain nonsense is as superfluous as a Cartesian anatomist dissecting pineal glands to try to discover the lynchpin between body and soul: >Descartes and the Pineal Gland
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/pineal-gland/
I haven't read this, but my impression is that it's one of those "Guns, Germs and Steel" books, that tries to explain history by pushing a particular and striking theory of "how things really happened", which is strikingly novel and also popularly accessible, and very likely open to counterarguments that handily demolish it, but which tries to come off to laymen as something seemingly seriously with plenty of support.
XD complete le system epic win my good sir!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>t. annoying low-caster
Are you ready for the dual subjec/logic? Read Lacan. And Deleuze. Bateson's Ecology of Mind. Matte Blanco on Bi-Logic next. Graham Priest on dialetheism perhaps.
You read Gilchrist? Balanced, dance, juggle, left+right hand path!
>Are you ready for the schizophrenia?
where to start with lacan? i really enjoyed TLP's book for what it's worth
Fink. Then Ecrits + Lectures
meds, now
I stopped liking Deleuze when I found out he actually hated the mentally ill. Good thing he killed himself then.
>the completion of german idealism is literally schizophrenia
We already knew this before Jaynes
so what you're saying is that if anyone takes German idealism seriously in this day and age they are schizos and need to take meds?
Then he's the cherry on top.
internal monologue is the god that spoke to moses and he was right to follow its instructions
If they eeren't so heavily inbred israelites today wouldn't be so prone to schizophrenia
It's a pop-sci version of Cassirer's mythopoetics.
https://monoskop.org/File:Cassirer_Ernst_Language_and_Myth_1953.Pdf
>pop-sci
no no no no no
Cassirer already explained the categories of the pre-Kantian mind and mythological thought decades before Jaynes, adding left-brain right-brain nonsense is as superfluous as a Cartesian anatomist dissecting pineal glands to try to discover the lynchpin between body and soul:
>Descartes and the Pineal Gland
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/pineal-gland/
no that was an archetype and he was schizo
I haven't read this, but my impression is that it's one of those "Guns, Germs and Steel" books, that tries to explain history by pushing a particular and striking theory of "how things really happened", which is strikingly novel and also popularly accessible, and very likely open to counterarguments that handily demolish it, but which tries to come off to laymen as something seemingly seriously with plenty of support.
I just can't vibe with the idea that ancient Greeks were not conscious, if by consciousness he means introspection.
i thought trump was going to do that