COSMIC DE

Just a few more weeks, Linux bros. In a few weeks, Linux will be saved.

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Just 2 more months

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Fedora COSMIC spin
    HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHNNNNNNNNNG

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >coded in rust
    thanks but I'll stick with i3wm

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      At least you're not a gnome gay. I can respect that.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      i3wm is all you will ever need

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Le oramge crab le hecking bad because... BECAUSE IT JUST IS OKAY?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Le oramge crab le hecking good because... BECAUSE IT JUST IS OKAY?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Le oramge crab le hecking good because... BECAUSE IT JUST IS OKAY?

        no funny arrow therefore you both say and look like that.

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Pop! should have kept snaps.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They're worse than Flatpak in every way and the one advantage it does have on the server is nullified by the fact that Docker exists but apparently nobody told Canonical that (Snap proponents love to hark on about how suitable Snaps are for server-side applications when the reality is that nobody wants their server tied to a proprietary store that auto-updates behind their backs)

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >but apparently nobody told Canonical that
        canonical has always had severe NIH syndrome. mir, upstart, etc

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Pop! should have kept sna-
      Your cryptowallet has been emptied. No refunds.

      They're worse than Flatpak in every way and the one advantage it does have on the server is nullified by the fact that Docker exists but apparently nobody told Canonical that (Snap proponents love to hark on about how suitable Snaps are for server-side applications when the reality is that nobody wants their server tied to a proprietary store that auto-updates behind their backs)

      tbf, Snaps can also be shipped unsandboxed, and some apps just don't work well (or at all) inside a sandbox.
      Honestly, they should just mimic Windows and keep the executable and all the libraries in the same folder. ezpz

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Snaps can also be shipped unsandboxed, and some apps just don't work well (or at all) inside a sandbox.
        Classic Snaps were a mistake in my opinion. Canonical wants to pretend that Snap is Universal when Classic Snaps break that promise (some Classic Snaps just do not work outside of Ubuntu. Snap in general doesn't work well outside of Ubuntu to be honest).

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I used VSCode as a snap on multiple distros just fine.
          The flatpak version had some weird bugs related to the sandbox and couldn't open system files, and I didn't want to install a deb/rpm and depend on the system not being shit.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >The flatpak version had some weird bugs related to the sandbox and couldn't open system files
            You can change that. It's just the default permissions being overly restrictive.

            I didn't mean to imply that every Classic Snap is broken, just that the potential is there (I encountered this myself in the past, I don't remember which Snap it was. I don't use Snaps anymore)

            Essentially, Classic Snaps break the portability guarantees. They might as well be .debs or .rpms

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Classic Snaps break the portability guarantees
            Speaking of portability guarantees, have the AppImage devs fixed the Fuse2 issue yet? I remember that was breaking AppImages on a bunch of systems.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            No and they're not going to. If anyone brings it up they just tell you to install libfuse 2 and that's the end of it.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Weird. From this guy's latest comment, it seems they wanted to embed libfuse3 in the appimage runtime, but there have been no updates in regards to that.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Even if they link it statically it's still going to depend on the host library that's needed to make FUSE work.

            Basically the situation is hopeless. If they want it to work everywhere then they need to support arbitrary versions of libfuse which seems like it'd be difficult or impossible to do.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Weird. From this guy's latest comment, it seems they wanted to embed libfuse3 in the appimage runtime, but there have been no updates in regards to that.

            One possible way to fix this would be to write a libappimage and make distributions ship that. It should have a fixed API.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            e.g instead of fusermount it could have a non-conflicting appimage-mount command, etc.

            Basically they just need to fork FUSE with only the bits they need.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Why can't an appimage just run its own version of FUSE by itself?
            Does it need to be loaded by the system in some special way and only the host's version is loaded like that or something?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Mounting filesystems is a privileged operation so you have to go through the libfuse library on the host which is either setuid root or has special capabilities.

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Is this how an open-source developer should behave online?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Yes.
      None of this:
      >This issue is getting a little heated
      Business from Ebussy

      Be a man.

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Thanks but i have a job, no time for tinker troony, so i stick with ubuntu + GNOME

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Thanks but i have a job, no time for tinker troony,
      Use Windows 10 or 11.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >use something that breaks equally or more often than rolling release linux distros

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Source: voices in my head

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Actually pretty excited to try it out. Wonder how long it'll take for it to make its way to Arch?

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    so we are getting "gnome but written in rust"?
    Why can't linux gays make good DE, how the 2 guys who work (sometimes) on xfce do better job than full team of paid devs?

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Why did thesw gays had to write ANOTHER fricking DE instead of siding with any of the existing ones?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      because it's written in rust to generate as much hype as possible from Linux gays and troons

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Because all existing DEs suck dick.

  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    make your own DE

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I don't know why I'd use anything other than awesomewm tho.

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >gnome on hrt
    no thanks

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      on hrt
      That's just Gnome.

  13. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >gnome
    into the trash it goes

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *