I think there is an about:something that tells you the memory used by each tab.
But to be honest, I dropped firefox a year ago.
Firefox was crashing twice a day for me, and it reaches a blood boiling point that I said enough is enough. Unfortunately Mozilla doesn't care about their main product stability...
I think there is an about:something that tells you the memory used by each tab.
But to be honest, I dropped firefox a year ago.
Firefox was crashing twice a day for me, and it reaches a blood boiling point that I said enough is enough. Unfortunately Mozilla doesn't care about their main product stability...
about:processes and about:memory
nowhere near as practical as whatever's that
Its not javascripts fault that webshitters have created millions of lines of bloat. Javascript is perfectly good when used for what it was originally intended.
I did the math a few weeks ago, and IQfy is using about 50–100 MB per tab. How does that compare to the actual data on the page (html and images)? About 10000–100000 times (!!!!!) more. It's not just twice, not 10, not even 100 or a thousand. I had to check the calculation multiple times.
I don't care that much because I have 128 GB of RAM and can deal with it for the time being, but still, how are these webshitters so fricking incompetent? I want to use this hardware to its full capacity, not have it shit itself after having opened too many tabs. It's mind-blowing. Imagine just wasting 100,000 of the memory and processing power you actually need for no fricking reason. So you have access to space ayylium tech, and smart people have already figured out the computer science theory, engineering, hardware, etc., and they found a way to paint a trillion transistors on a chip the size of a toenail. But then you have these "maffs raycis yall" nepo baby normaltards who think Fizzbuzz and XOR are "higher maffs n shiet for stinky incels" and have no idea what "mega" (or mibi) really means. I could show you the contents of two books on this page with 1 MiB because it quite literally means a million bytes or characters uncompressed.
Not reading all that,
still blocking all jeetscript if your website breaks I will simply not use it.
Death to webshitters death to webshitters, dynamic programming should be a requirement for devshit jobs not because it's helpful or relevant but because it filters a good chunk of Black folk who shouldn't be allowed near computers.
>Unused RAM is wasted RAM
Unused RAM is a contingency for when you eventually have a high load of memory (or if one of your sticks fails for some reason), but I admit there are some currently low benchmarks and peak use times that support the spirit of your sentiment.
>infinite scrollable
No such thing as infinitely scrollable, 64bit computers can support ~19 exabytes of memory at most if you assume the theoretical maximum of what OPs computer is possibly running, and the site doesn't have enough content to serve.
>wah wah wah it'd react and js
99% of the time it's CSS, fonts, and websites not using a CDN and sending full-sized images and im tired of pretending it's not.
Most of the time it's all the absolutely moronic 3rd party scripts you have to load because management got bamboozled by some snake oil salesman and/or marketing need to track more data to justify their jobs
React is usually pre installing those scripts and those API calls are not using that much memory.
Jquery is unironically worse because back in the day people would force the browsers to fetch all jquery / bootstrap from source for EVERY SINGLE PAGE
Guys we need more infra so our users can view uncompressed PNG files of 500*500px and up
You just host the images on a basic ass cdn and then use basic url params to not fetch 4000x 4000 images unless your users need to zoom in on some dogs butthole. Or is the solution to host every single variant of a jpeg yourself?
Mongoloid Amerifat, how many tabs can you have open at 5GB a pop, and what other apps are you running?
Black folk like you should be removed as malware.
Based thread anon. I always say webshitters are mankind's worst enemy. Them and UX designers. We must fund a lynch them on trees. They're worse than Black folk.
Looks like a problem with your browser. I can't get Dailymail to go over 250mb of used memory per tab myself. Though it makes sense for it to be a memory intensive website since they have videos on just about every article and videos up the ass.
except those videos, code, images, etc. don't need that much space. They're israelites so they compress everything to shit and most of these videos I imagine are less than a MB. Most of those images are like 50-100 KB. As for the rest of the context (which is just text):
$ curl -s https://gist.githubusercontent.com/StevenClontz/4445774/raw/1722a289b665d940495645a5eaaad4da8e3ad4c7/mobydick.txt | wc -c | numfmt --to=iec-i
629Ki
"News" sites are proof that mankind deserves mass extinction. How the frick many ads, pop overs/unders and mini players can one fricking page support. Much less the pop ups to try and get you to subscribe for this totally special limited time deal for only $1.
Probably Safaris fault. Apple doesn't adhere to standards so every library has to reimplement most of the stuff the better browsers could do natively and more efficiently
FOR ONE SINGLE FRICKING TAB
>look for the slop
>ear the slop
>"what the ffffrick I'm eating this shit??
Yep, you dig your own hole
Javascript was a msitake.
told you that literally 25 years ago
That's pretty cool, is there a feature like that in Firefox that lets you see how much memory a page is taking up?
I think there is an about:something that tells you the memory used by each tab.
But to be honest, I dropped firefox a year ago.
Firefox was crashing twice a day for me, and it reaches a blood boiling point that I said enough is enough. Unfortunately Mozilla doesn't care about their main product stability...
Come home, white man.
Good Evening! Use Brave.
>use chrome
No thank you!
Yeah Firefox keeps causing BSODs for me and would constantly cause kernel panics when I ran Linux for a hot minute.
The latest firefox update added those tab popup hover thing. Idk if it shows memory usage though.
about:processes and about:memory
nowhere near as practical as whatever's that
F12 then memory tab, tree view and click on save. That'll get how much memory is using at the current moment.
Its not javascripts fault that webshitters have created millions of lines of bloat. Javascript is perfectly good when used for what it was originally intended.
Update real-time information?
Tell me one good reason why HTML should not include basic stuff, like htmx does, and leave the browser do the heavy lifting?
uh, bloat is what it was intended for
I did the math a few weeks ago, and IQfy is using about 50–100 MB per tab. How does that compare to the actual data on the page (html and images)? About 10000–100000 times (!!!!!) more. It's not just twice, not 10, not even 100 or a thousand. I had to check the calculation multiple times.
it really takes talent to make a website as simple as 4chin use 100+mb
I don't get how webtards do it
I did that too and is indeed using around 50MB of RAM, despite only downloading around ~1MB of page
>transferito
>amerimutt sees another language and immediatelly bursts into laughter
I don't care that much because I have 128 GB of RAM and can deal with it for the time being, but still, how are these webshitters so fricking incompetent? I want to use this hardware to its full capacity, not have it shit itself after having opened too many tabs. It's mind-blowing. Imagine just wasting 100,000 of the memory and processing power you actually need for no fricking reason. So you have access to space ayylium tech, and smart people have already figured out the computer science theory, engineering, hardware, etc., and they found a way to paint a trillion transistors on a chip the size of a toenail. But then you have these "maffs raycis yall" nepo baby normaltards who think Fizzbuzz and XOR are "higher maffs n shiet for stinky incels" and have no idea what "mega" (or mibi) really means. I could show you the contents of two books on this page with 1 MiB because it quite literally means a million bytes or characters uncompressed.
Not reading all that,
still blocking all jeetscript if your website breaks I will simply not use it.
Death to webshitters death to webshitters, dynamic programming should be a requirement for devshit jobs not because it's helpful or relevant but because it filters a good chunk of Black folk who shouldn't be allowed near computers.
*death to devshitters
Unused RAM is wasted RAM
>Unused RAM is wasted RAM
Unused RAM is a contingency for when you eventually have a high load of memory (or if one of your sticks fails for some reason), but I admit there are some currently low benchmarks and peak use times that support the spirit of your sentiment.
top midwit comment
It's a meme you insufferable moron
This was my opinion when Netscape 2.0 was released
Pretty sure that site is infinite scrollable, if you scroll far enough i could see this happening.
>infinite scrollable
No such thing as infinitely scrollable, 64bit computers can support ~19 exabytes of memory at most if you assume the theoretical maximum of what OPs computer is possibly running, and the site doesn't have enough content to serve.
autism is a terrible disease, not just for the afflicted, but also for the people around them. please be considerate.
Are you using a 27" 1080 monitor?
The individual pixels are quite distinctly visible.
>Yeah let's make every single website, every single static page on the web in React, what could go wrong?
>wah wah wah it'd react and js
99% of the time it's CSS, fonts, and websites not using a CDN and sending full-sized images and im tired of pretending it's not.
Guys we need more infra so our users can view uncompressed PNG files of 500*500px and up
Most of the time it's all the absolutely moronic 3rd party scripts you have to load because management got bamboozled by some snake oil salesman and/or marketing need to track more data to justify their jobs
React is usually pre installing those scripts and those API calls are not using that much memory.
Jquery is unironically worse because back in the day people would force the browsers to fetch all jquery / bootstrap from source for EVERY SINGLE PAGE
You just host the images on a basic ass cdn and then use basic url params to not fetch 4000x 4000 images unless your users need to zoom in on some dogs butthole. Or is the solution to host every single variant of a jpeg yourself?
>t backend engineer
modern CSS is absolutely Black personlicious
Embedded videos?
that is 186 trackers and 2500 adverts
Stop being poor and buy a better computer nerd
Mongoloid Amerifat, how many tabs can you have open at 5GB a pop, and what other apps are you running?
Black folk like you should be removed as malware.
>raycis maffs
hey bruh you, you know, vote trump, uncultured europoor bruh, muh libuhruhls, muh republicahns, muh stick of budder, muh calories, muh guns, muh homiehrs, you konw, stop being, bro, listen, homie, you know, vote biden, you know *lip smacking*, muh electricity bill, muh taxes, muh voooting, muh fat shaming, you know, bro, listen... maffs is so raycis bruh
Spoken like a true American. Gubless.
Based thread anon. I always say webshitters are mankind's worst enemy. Them and UX designers. We must fund a lynch them on trees. They're worse than Black folk.
4.8GB for a single tab?!
I don't even have that much RAM in my laptop.
Looks like a problem with your browser. I can't get Dailymail to go over 250mb of used memory per tab myself. Though it makes sense for it to be a memory intensive website since they have videos on just about every article and videos up the ass.
It was open for about an hour
except those videos, code, images, etc. don't need that much space. They're israelites so they compress everything to shit and most of these videos I imagine are less than a MB. Most of those images are like 50-100 KB. As for the rest of the context (which is just text):
$ curl -s https://gist.githubusercontent.com/StevenClontz/4445774/raw/1722a289b665d940495645a5eaaad4da8e3ad4c7/mobydick.txt | wc -c | numfmt --to=iec-i
629Ki
$ curl -s https://gist.githubusercontent.com/StevenClontz/4445774/raw/1722a289b665d940495645a5eaaad4da8e3ad4c7/mobydick.txt | compress | wc -c | numfmt --to=iec-i
272Ki
So how many mobydicks are in my current IQfy tab, which uses 60 MiB?
$ python3 -c "print(round($(units -t "60 MiB" "bytes")/$(units -t "$(curl -s https://gist.githubusercontent.com/StevenClontz/4445774/raw/1722a289b665d940495645a5eaaad4da8e3ad4c7/mobydick.txt | wc -c | numfmt --to=iec-i)B" "bytes"*~~"
98
that's nothing compared to this abomination of a site
im convinced its mining something with my CPU
>daily fail
Don't worry java bros rust trannies will take the helm over with RustyWeb
"News" sites are proof that mankind deserves mass extinction. How the frick many ads, pop overs/unders and mini players can one fricking page support. Much less the pop ups to try and get you to subscribe for this totally special limited time deal for only $1.
you are mining crypto for them
Probably Safaris fault. Apple doesn't adhere to standards so every library has to reimplement most of the stuff the better browsers could do natively and more efficiently