Imagine being a galaxy that intelligent life develops on near the edge of the universe and you develop imaging telescopes like this, and one way you look looks like op pics, and if they take a picture the other direction they just see a few galaxies and then endless endless endless dark black;
Or some type of bubble wall that is the sealed seam of the gravity/em field
No I mean, the universe deffinitly has a perimeter of an outer edge; there cannot at any given time exist an infinite amount if material; therefore at every given time the universe is some finite shape. One can be located closer or further from the edge of that shape
Yeah but you can't photograph the edge from within it.
2 years ago
Anonymous
If you are in a galaxy near the edge, and photograph toward the edge, with the power of jwst, you will only see a few Galaxies and then maybe likely (unless multiverse or God) endless darkness
2 years ago
Anonymous
Firatly, You are never near the edge of the universe. It's impossible as the universe is always expanding away from the point of reference.
And even if you could, you would keep zooming in and occassionally finding an object, star or galaxy. Never truely finding an exact edge, or never being certain you had found it.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>And even if you could, you would keep zooming in and occassionally finding an object, star or galaxy. Never truely finding an exact edge, or never being certain you had found it.
pure assumption
2 years ago
Anonymous
The relative edge would be, you using the powerful jwst, and instead of seeing a billion faint white dots, seeing like 30 big galaxies, and No small galaxies or dots... Ask you would be near the edge, where in a direction would be no more galaxies
You also must remember that from their perspective they would be at the centre of this bubble... and really there would be no boundary, just a point at which you cannot see anything.
There you have it folks, the universe has oscillating surface brightness which aligns exactly with JWST's exotic optics, good thing they decided to build it that way.
Why does it shine?
why why why why why
It's an imaging artifact due to webb's mirror being hexagonal
the shining heats the atmospheres
>Why does it shine?
I believe that is quark gluon plasma.
cucked by infrared
Isn't the black part in the center of stars just a function of long exposure time?
Oversaturation.
JWST site says it's 'dithering' from small movement adjustments of the mirror segments.
Fake, mightaswell be done by dalle mini
They appear in the eyes.
Alright who's gonna start counting
Probably any dark spot in the picture has this kinda picture in it
>fractal universe theory
>>>/x/
What else would there be? Flying teapots?
based
filtered
Looks like ass. Congrats. That'll be 10 billion USD plus taxes.
wth am I looking at?
Imagine being a galaxy that intelligent life develops on near the edge of the universe and you develop imaging telescopes like this, and one way you look looks like op pics, and if they take a picture the other direction they just see a few galaxies and then endless endless endless dark black;
Or some type of bubble wall that is the sealed seam of the gravity/em field
An image taken near the start of the universe would have seen mostly a bright glow. If even they see stars at all.
No I mean, the universe deffinitly has a perimeter of an outer edge; there cannot at any given time exist an infinite amount if material; therefore at every given time the universe is some finite shape. One can be located closer or further from the edge of that shape
Yeah but you can't photograph the edge from within it.
If you are in a galaxy near the edge, and photograph toward the edge, with the power of jwst, you will only see a few Galaxies and then maybe likely (unless multiverse or God) endless darkness
Firatly, You are never near the edge of the universe. It's impossible as the universe is always expanding away from the point of reference.
And even if you could, you would keep zooming in and occassionally finding an object, star or galaxy. Never truely finding an exact edge, or never being certain you had found it.
>And even if you could, you would keep zooming in and occassionally finding an object, star or galaxy. Never truely finding an exact edge, or never being certain you had found it.
pure assumption
The relative edge would be, you using the powerful jwst, and instead of seeing a billion faint white dots, seeing like 30 big galaxies, and No small galaxies or dots... Ask you would be near the edge, where in a direction would be no more galaxies
You also must remember that from their perspective they would be at the centre of this bubble... and really there would be no boundary, just a point at which you cannot see anything.
homosexual shit
Thanks for playing.
MY GOD, IT'S FULL OF STARS!
IT'S OVER
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
what did god mean by putting us in this shithole
We are all turds.
everyone's in their own corner of the universe separated by time and space asking the same questions
Not talking about the diffraction spikes, but what are the read diagonal beams throughout?
Maybe blooming? When sensors get overloaded by the amount of light and generate too many electrons, so the electrons jump to nearest pixels
so those shiny dots burning the censor are stars and I'm assuming everything else are total galaxies?
Pretty cool, actually
What can we expect from the James Webb first images? I'm guessing nothing will be discovered until it's been working for a couple of months
Will probably take a couple of years until we get to the important stuff.
What do you think could possibly be discovered, what could qualify as the important stuff?
It will detect the first galaxies, if it gets very lucky it will detect the first stars.
It will also look at exoplanets, so it could detect life
wtf? this isn't what we were promised on the patreon
There you have it folks, the universe has oscillating surface brightness which aligns exactly with JWST's exotic optics, good thing they decided to build it that way.
> 6,435 tweets
wtf, i dont think i can shitpost that much
why do they represent infrared as red couldn't they pick the entire visible spectrum for a more fun show
It's a monochromatic image. What colour would you map to what?
depends if its infrared or uv