Do audiophiles really think they need more than this?
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
Do audiophiles really think they need more than this?
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
>no audiophile rocks
>no audiophile crystal therapy
ngmi
wtf is that?
Misty's hands are growing because of the Crystal treatment for her illness in ICU.
what is this crystal treatment though?
and why does she want her hands to grow?
I don't think she wants it, it's just a side-effect of the treatment.
but what is this crystal treatment?
is it just this? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crystal_healing
The cable converts audio?
It converts the digital signal to an analog output
Nah. it probably does nothing more than tells these selected phones to send the signal by analog
I don't need that
>ugreen
Come on man, audiophilia is bullshit but don't go for the chinkest shit.
>USB-C, in its general form, outputs digital audio instead. In such cases, the headphones or connected device needs to handle the conversion. That's why you find a chip inside some USB-C to 3.5 mm converters. But if the phone comes with a DAC for wired audio, the USB-C can offer converted analog audio output.
Now tell me why this $7.99 is not universal dac but works with selected phones only?
Audiophiles dont play music from a fricking phone and then make it even worse by putting it through an $8 converter, you stupid frick
this. the cable needs to be at least $800 for it to have a real placebo effect
The dongels work for PC you morons
I know it's a consequence of phones losing headphone jacks, but the abundance of decent quality, compact USB DACs as a result has been fantastic.
phones have even better DACs than that but youre not wrong
I bet you don't even have directional ethernet cables.
uh... buh... what if I need to upload something?
You can do it, but the quality on the receiving side will be worse.
KEK
with audiophiles, nothing is real, everything is satire
audiophile reporting in.
none of us would be seen dead using a phone to play music thats a poorgay solution.
we use DEDICATED hardware that is designed SPECIFICALLY for music and NOTHING else.
a phone is a jack of all trades master of none device, you penny scraping peasants.
I'm an audiophile, too. I use a phone and a $70 set of Bluetooth headphones where the pleather covering the foam cups is peeling off. Sounds fantastic.
All current dedicated hardware designed specifically for music are just phone guts.
thats nice. if only you knew how the phone screen and battery affect audio quality you wouldnt make such ill informed posts.
Also just phone parts in those devices that have internal batteries and/or screens.
i am an audio genius
enlighten me or kys baiting homosexual
The companies are full of shit and there is a huge amount of shared component usage between common devices and audiophile devices and it doesn't matter.
It's also digital audio rendering your avalanche of stupid shit irrelevant.
>no cable risers
>no harmonizing crystals
>no snake oil
Yes.
Yeah, you need something to plug into the DAC
there is no reason to use wired headphones anyway
Idk, haven't measured it. For all I know it's decent assuming you don't need much of an amplifier. Of course, just because it accepts 24 bits doesn't mean it actually has a good signal/noise ratio.
> audiophiles
What's important about the Ram is where you download it from.
>ram impacts sound quality
i can't even
bruv wat
Are the audiophiles on this board with us right now?
Boomers still unironically use wired headphones? Lol sad ngl frfr