Do OLED and mini-LED screens fully surpass the image quality of even the best commercial cinemas?

Do OLED and mini-LED screens fully surpass the image quality of even the best commercial cinemas?

It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14

Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68

It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14

  1. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why is green overrepresented?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      We see green better than other colors? Although that would have led me to think that it would be under represented

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        it *is* underrepresented in OP pic. I guess anon just had a brainfart there

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Every 2x2 block has one blue, one red, but two greens.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demosaicing
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayer_filter

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      systemic racism

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Purely socioeconomic factors

  2. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    probably no, but those best commercial cinemas have very huge projection equipments, so probably even the cheapest OLED panel in the market is better than the average cinema

  3. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    just look at your pic and tell me it's the same quality as a 15000 watt lamp shining through celluloid

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      watt lamp
      Doesn't tell me anything without the image size to go with it.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        it's about 600x brighter than your pathetic display

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Without knowing the screen size there is no way to know how bright it is, anon. The brightness is divided over the area of the screen.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Consumer direct view LCD and mini-LED televisions can reach peak nits brightness levels far beyond anything any cinema projector (or home projector) can deliver.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >celluloid
      A good majority of movies don't bother with film anymore. It's only really IMAX where things can be in 70mm film.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        It's more than "a good majority". It's 99.9%.
        Only 30 locations worldwide had the capability to play Oppenheimer in real 70mm.

  4. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    if you're don't something moronic like comparing the pixel density of an iPhone when put up against the screen of an IMAX theatre, sure

  5. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    A $300 TCL LED LCD television from the last few years has a better image quality than most cinemas that aren't Imax or Dolby Vision. Which is 99% of commercial cinemas.

  6. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Mini-LED has the halo effect which a typical 3-DLP cinema projector won't have. This is a fairly small disadvantage and overall the Mini-LED still has a better picture. But it does disqualify the specific phrase of "fully surpass".

  7. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    OLED and mini-LED screens can have a flaw called "Dirty Screen Effect" which diminishes the quality of the image. This is usually a *very* minor flaw. But it doesn't exist with a 3-DLP projector (which has its own set of innate flaws).

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >DLP
      I remember seeing dlp had a real grainy look from all the tiny mirrors.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        That was probably rear projection DLP, right?
        These days the successor to the big boxy rear projection DLP TV is the Laser TV. Which is actually just an Ultra Short Throw projector with a TV tuner bundled with an ambient light rejecting screen all sold as one piece of kit.

        They are quite good at what they do for the price point.

  8. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I don't know the numbers but a big percentage, maybe the majority of commercial cinemas, don't even have the capability of 4k resolution. They are showing movies in 2k. People are paying to see what is basically a 1080p blu-ray blown up on a 20' screen.

  9. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    some commercial theaters already use miniLED, and will likely switch to microLED when it becomes affordable. However, DLP projectors have evolved and it is unlikely that your consumer display will surpass a high-end commercial cinema projector anytime soon.

    research this: https://www.christiedigital.com/products/projectors/all-projectors/christie-eclipse/

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      While the projector is impressive, OLED can equal and exceed its performance. Recall that there are 8k OLEDs available today.

      Additionally, there are far more 4k blu-ray releases than films which are distributed in cinemas in 4k. Even if the cinema has a 4k projector it may only receive a 2k file to show.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        homie what size is that OLED? what it the refresh rate? how does it handle 3D? go the frick back to redd!t

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >size
          They get extremely huge. Not as big as a cinema screen but the OP is specifically about image quality, not screen size.
          >3d
          Some OLEDs have this feature. It's not often requested by home users so only a few units get it.
          >refresh rate
          Vastly higher than cinema projectors will display.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >what it the refresh rate?
          A high-end professional 3DLP cinema projector like the one mentioned here

          some commercial theaters already use miniLED, and will likely switch to microLED when it becomes affordable. However, DLP projectors have evolved and it is unlikely that your consumer display will surpass a high-end commercial cinema projector anytime soon.

          research this: https://www.christiedigital.com/products/projectors/all-projectors/christie-eclipse/

          is still only 120hz refresh rate maximum.

          OLEDs go up to 480hz these days.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Because cinema content does not go up to 60hz let alone 120hz. It's a nice to have but the cost of higher isn't worth it

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >buying a 480hz screen for 24fps films
            pure moronation. go back to IQfy

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            You're argument has become incoherent. First you imply the refresh rate matters, then you don't.

  10. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    My local cinema uses a shit-tier LCD projector with lots of ghosting and terrible blacks. It's also underpowered for the screen size so the image is dull. The kids working there have no idea how to change the settings so everything that isn't 16:9 gets the sides cut off.

  11. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    absolutely not

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Elaborate with technical details pls.

  12. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    no

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      clickbait

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      i want to make out with her

  13. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >best commercial cinemas
    They will surpass reality. Monitors already did at one aspect, which is refresh rate. Went way beyond 24 FPS of human limit.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Maybe your limit.
      I can see 60hz flicker

  14. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    This is a photo of a Formovie laser TV in operation.
    If I saw this and didn't know I'd just think it was a digital screencap.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Only in a very dark room.
      As soon as you have any significant ambient light the image quality dives below the shittiest LCD televisions.

      Plus they still have rainbow effect even with the new three laser designs.

  15. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Another example. Here you can get more of the sense it's a projected image.

  16. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Theoretically a person could build a rear projection television using a laser TV. There would be some degradation of the image quality but it would result in a HUGE television for not that much money that is viewable* in the daytime.

    *as much as any rear projection TV ever was, curb expectations harshly

  17. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Most people here don't even look at display models and have no understanding of human perception. All those "huge" number changes matter a lot less in person in most real content you would actually watch. + no display is perfect no matter how much you try to convince yourself otherwise. MicroLED is the closest we'll get and those won't be affordable for another decade. And even then, sample and hold is still a cancer among us and won't be mitigated enough until 500Hz+ becomes commonplace, and that's probably even further away than microLED. So buckle up like an adult and just buy something good enough. It won't be your last display and everything available today will look like junk in next to the new stuff in 3-5 years anyway. You are not a camera. You are most likely not a video professional (if you truly are, you'll be supplied an appropriate display).

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Just answer the question please.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *