Do we know of any innocent person ever being lynched? Or did they all deserve it.
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
Do we know of any innocent person ever being lynched? Or did they all deserve it.
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
almost all deserved it, which is what makes the propaganda that much more aggravating
Yea I keep reading wikipedia articles on them and they all have lines about the accused confessing and admitting to where the murder weapon was hidden and all sorts of details proving they did it. Then it tries to claim the community was "in the wrong" for burning these people over a bed of coals. Im just not seeing it.
They weren't given a trial for many of them, many didn't even get a proper or fair trial, others were stolen from prison and illegally hung. Both are extremely fricked up and negatively hurt the justice system. It's called barbaric for a reason
OP is talking about justice in general, not the "justice system™".
Rapists and murderers being brought to justice is a good thing regardless of whether it's done by the state or local communities.
It's not justice unless it's done by the state.
How much of a cuck can you be jesus christ
Law and justice couldnt be further apart in our modern society
Still better than anarchy.
Lynchings didn't throw society into anarchy though.
Lol yeah they were moments of violent anarchy, like most instances of mob rule
Look at how Americans on this site and elsewhere rave constantly about blacks and how much they hate them and want to kill them, how they celebrate when a random black guy gets shot by police, now ask yourself that again.
Has a innocent black man ever been shot by the police?
Dilate
Yes.
Pic related did nothing wrong.
I miss Chocolate Rambo
Most were lynched before any sort of trial, so those were all innocent legally speaking.
Theres also this little murderer who reddit loves to claim "was later proven innocent" which of course is bullshit. People 100 years later decided "actually no we think the black boy dindunuffin"
I recall a few but I don't remember the exact cases, most of the time the person did commit, or was suspected of committing a crime. Usually also without regard for any sort of trial.
I remember seeing an argument regarding this child, it still seems pretty up in the air to me.
This sick frick raped two children under the age of 9 and Im expected to feel sorry for him, white progressive have to be genuinely evil to defend this scum.
>This sick frick raped two children under the age of 9
And mùore importantly, he killed them afterward
Yes, death is worse than getting raped
Nope every single lynched was a disgusting piece of shit with black on black crime on their records, and if you white progressive ass is willing to call a black with black on black crime on their record a good person, honestly please get a gun and shoot your brains out.
meds
Cutee picture, are they italian americans?
/pol/troony thread
All of them were innocent. Because the guilt wasn't proven in a fair trial.
So if I rape you and am never convicted Im innocent?
Yes.
As far as the law is concerned, yeah.
Why are we only dealing with the law here?
Lynchings are extrajudicial.
That's why they're illegal.
Thats not the topic at hand. I can shoot a theif and it might be illegal, but the thief is not innocent and justice was served. So back to OP
>Do we know of any innocent person ever being lynched? Or did they all deserve it.
Currently no. Also it seems the lions share of lynching "victims" all had trials and were convicted before their lynchings.
We are not back to anything. If guilt would have been proven in a fair trial even _after_ the lynching then the lynchers could have been freed from responsibility, but if not (like there were not any trial even post-factum, or it was showed that it was biased, or there were no proofs of guilt then the lynchers should have been sentenced to death. After a trial where _their_ guilt has been proven of course.
Ah, so by your logic the holocaust didnt happen, and hitler was innocent because there was no trial and the post factum trial was biased
rent free
>no no no! Not like that
Just applying your same logic, A man can only be guilty of a crime if there was a trial, as you said. Hitler therefore is completely innocent, as you said. Please point to where I am wrong. Id love to hear about the fair trial proving Hitler was guilty of ordering the holocaust happened before his death.
People responsible for starting a war of aggression are just criminals if you ask me.
But do you have a fair and unbiased trial proving he did that.
As we have already discussed one can only be guilty of doing something if proven in court.... or so I am told
What trial proved Hitler invaded poland?
>one can only be guilty of doing something if proven in court
AHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHASHAHAHASHASDHSDFGISZRJ9ZERJSOTNKZ-JWE[TLIJ09w#EITJ=0ZNW46=0K
Oh good we are in agreement because that was my exact reaction to
and
Yeah, getting really tired of the moralizing leftypol homosexuals that spam the board claiming that we should feel guilty that some rapists and murderers were killed by their communities
You need a trial if defender pleads not guilty. If a rapist brags in the whole world about his deeds you have my permission to lynch him.
btw, I can vouch that you are innocent of raping me, you're just bragging.
>It was consensual
Anon... Im so happy :,)
kek, a good one.
a first sign a working brain in you; that's something.
Except all the evidence indicates he was responsible, as were his fellow Nazis.
But most lynching "victims" had a trial BEFORE they were lynched and none of the trials were biased.
False, generally
kangaroo courts of lynch mobs are not equipped to find men guilty to a reasonable standard we expect in civil society
Do you have any evidence any of these "victims" were tried in "kangaroo courts"?
Jailing a piece of shit is pointless, its better to just kill them.
ok so go back to africa and live your life then Black person
>Do we know of any innocent person ever being lynched? Or did they all deserve it.
It's pure democracy in action.
Everyone's in agreement and there's only one dissenting vote.
I thought you clowns wanted democracy?
>admit they did it, equivalent to a guilty plea
>torture them to death anyway
Southrons are not human
Emmett Till's accuser later admitted she made up that he'd grabbed her and said obscene stuff to her. He got lynched over her lies.
Ive heard this and yet Ive found zero evidence. Where did she admit it and to who? Shes alive and denies admitting it.
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017/01/how-author-timothy-tyson-found-the-woman-at-the-center-of-the-emmett-till-case
Where does she admit she made it up
>“Nothing that boy did could ever justify what happened to him.”
Thats not a statement of "it didnt happen" or "I made it up"
and to the "thats parts not true" line
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/nbcblk/justice-department-closes-inquiry-murder-emmett-finds-no-proof-accuser-rcna7806
Theres no evidence she ever said that
Copium
Yea total copium yet the "journalist" who reported it is clearly not biased... Imagine falling for this revisionist rubbish
>"Carolyn Bryant denies it and avoids talking about it like it was the plague," he said. "I am standing in the public square telling the truth as I see it based on solid evidence."
>He said his interview with Donham revealed nothing new because "we have long known she was lying." Tyson noted that his book also included dozens of pages of documented evidence, including evidence the FBI collected when it reopened the case in 2004.
so this "journalist" claims his interview "revealed nothing new" but also claims she admitted to lying to him but also demands that everyone kinda ignore she admitted it to him
>"Let us just look at the evidence as if I had never talked to Carolyn," Tyson said. "That she lied in court does not depend on her admission of it to me, not at all."
Whats the point of this? More blacks were lynched due to black on black rape anyway.
The point is that Emmett Till WAS guilty, and the modern myth that the woman who reported his crimes was lying is just that, a myth, made up by a activist journalist who cant even keep his story straight.
Why do IQfytards turn into white knights when white women accuse black men of raping them? Do they think women from the past were 'trad' and never lied? Or do they just want to spite black people?
A prolonged entryism project originally by stormfront, later other white supremacist groups + extensive samegayging by 1 or 2 autists whose broken brains seized onto racism as their obsession instead of trains or sanic.
Because if a house next to an actively erupting volcano catches fire, Im going to just logically conclude the volcano was involved.
That's a poor metaphor, since houses are not built next to actively erupting volcanoes
Thankfully, that decision is not up to you
Why are you thankful for that? Is your objective to have more rapes and murders? Or simple to hinder white society?
My objective is to limit the influence of racists like you
Ahh, mean words bad, rape murder ok.
You are certainly on the right side of history my friend!
>words bad, rape murder ok
Strawman
>Stop being racist!
>Allow the black men to rape and murder at will you bigot ITS THEIR CULTURE
This isnt a strawman, this is your literal argument
>Allow the black men to rape and murder at will you bigot ITS THEIR CULTURE
So, again, strawman
Ok so you agree blacks should be segregated so they cant rape and murder white people at will
The war on straw continues
Ahh I see youre using the slippery slope logical fallacy, that might work on a lesser trained redditor, but not me.
> straw straw straw straw
Did you just learn what a strawman is? Have you literally nothing else to refute his points? You fricking moron
His points have nothing to do with what I am talking about
Because youre talking about bails of hay and we are talking about the proven fact that so far every lynching "victim" cited was in fact guilty of the crimes they were accused of.
How was Mary Turner guilty
Harboring a fugitive, the man who murdered the plantation owner.
Also her unborn child was not a person so thats not murder, lets not pretend fetuses are human, remember.
>Also her unborn child was not a person so thats not murder, lets not pretend fetuses are human, remember.
Dilate, commie atheist troony garbage
>nooo you cant use my own logic against me reeee
>its perfectly legal to cut a baby out of a pregnant woman its not murder its just an abortion
You sound like you missed a dilation session. Better get to it.
She lived with him because she was her husband, and not a fugitive at all, but a random black guy who knew the owner.
>Her "unborn babe" fell to the ground and gave "two feeble cries."[7] Its head was crushed by a member of the mob with his heel, and the crowd shot hundreds of bullets into Turner's body
Gotta leave it to the south, a hundred years ahead of the North on abortion issues
>citation: NCAAP "investigator" who went down years after to investigate
Yea im sure he got some pretty accurate first hand accounts from the lynch mob and not fables from the local nogs
>NAACP announcing the South's social advancement into late term abortion
Good on the communist NAACP
>NAACP made up a lynching that never happened
FTFY
no you don't understand, they were applauding the southerners for taking out the trash, that was a future criminal you know
If he had any points to argue he would, instead he tries to derail the thread because theres too much truth going on.
The fact this thread already proved Emmett Till guilty makes it a Target Priority 1 by the troony pedophile rapists that spam this board.
The most notorious criminals of the era were whites. Some are "famous" to this day, but they were not being lynched.
I strongly suspect that many motherfrickers were getting off scot-free at the time by just blaming some random blacks for their crimes and "closing the case" this way.
>be black
>rape and kill a woman that you live near
>don't even bother to try and escape
>uh, hey blue gum, did you rape and murder Ms. Miranda?
>duh, maybe? Uh, yes. I mean... no...
>George get the rope
>be white
>commit some sort of thievery
>run away
Literally this.
Lets take Jesse Washington for example.
>Lucy Fryer found murdered.
>Man claims Jesse Washington was in the area just before she was found dead.
>police find Jesse
>Covered in blood
>Brought in for questioning
>Admits to everything
>admits to where the hammer that killed her was hidden
>Tried and found guilty
>Murdered by mob after trial
MUH INNOCENT BLACK BOY!
Whites literally lynched all the time, in fact MORE often than blacks.
The largest lynching in american history was against italian americans. But the schools wont tell you that.
>fact MORE often than blacks.
Depends on the era. Definitely false for the 1890s
scottsboro boys
5 black teens get into a confrontation with some white teens
they're arrested and put in jail for a few days
two women come forward and say the black teens raped them
doctor examines the women and finds no evidence of rape.
a lynch mob starts to assemble, hundreds, then thousands of white men
the only person who stands between the mob and the lynchers is one white sheriff
>Believe all women
>unless its a black man shes accusing
It's the opposite. White incels will vent their hatred and mistrust of women, call them lying prostitutes, but when they accuse a black man, they're as righteous as Mary
>It's the opposite. Pinko incels will vent their hatred and mistrust of men, calling them colonizers and rapists, but when accused by a white person, theyre as righteous as Mary
Have you seen this thread? Suddenly, white women are perfect little people who would never hurt a fly
Are you claiming white women are habitual liars?
Are black women habitual liars too?
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
commies aren't welcome on IQfy
Blacks are very misogynistic suspecting them of rape is completely logical since blacks do not seem register women are people, you would know this if you lived around them you sheltered progressive frick.
The other way round. Blacks actually have wieners because their women had a say in selecting their partners.
>homosexual troony fantasizes about the bbc he sees in porn
cant make this shit up
Its you who were fantasizing about some homosexual rapes itt.
yup sure whatever, everyone is free to read the thread
There is obviously some love and hate relations between gommies and nazis - and between gommie trannies and "regular" nazi homosexuals kek.
>please ERP with me
you have children on discord to do that with
yep, no idea what your lgtb ? lingo means
>On May 16, 1918, a plantation owner was murdered, prompting a manhunt which resulted in a series of lynchings in May 1918 in southern Georgia, United States.
>White people killed at least 13 black people during the next two weeks.
>Among those killed were Hayes and Mary Turner. Hayes was killed on May 18, and the next day (May 19), his pregnant wife Mary was strung up by her feet, doused with gasoline and oil then set on fire. Mary's unborn child was cut from her abdomen and stomped to death.
>Her body was then repeatedly shot. No one was ever convicted of her lynching.
>Following the lynchings, more than 500 black residents fled the area to escape the violence, although white people threatened to kill black workers who tried to leave.
>By the time he was taken to city hall, a group had prepared wood for a bonfire next to a tree in front of the building.[23] Washington was doused with oil, hanged from the tree by a chain, and lowered to the ground.[26] Members of the crowd cut off his fingers, toes, and genitals.[23] The fire was lit and Washington was repeatedly raised and lowered into the flames until he burned to death. Washington attempted to climb the chain, but was unable to do so without fingers.[28]
Imagine how fast crime would drop if we did this to every gangbanger
>Washington attempted to climb the chain, but was unable to do so without fingers.
black man can't climb (without fingers)
this is useful information
>black man brutally murders and rapes woman for some quick dopamine
>lacks higher order thinking to understand this could result in consequences
>unga bungas back to his hut and thinks tomorrow will be a normal day
>brutally tortured for his crimes
Its always nice to justice can be served
Tried in the Middle Ages. Doesn't help much.