Do you need privacy privacy extensions like ublock for brave?

Do you need privacy privacy extensions like ublock for brave?

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    It's built in. This didn't have to be a thread.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Yep. SHIELDS UP!

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        too bad shields breaks half the sites I go to so i end up having to turn them off on that site anyway

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        too bad shields breaks half the sites I go to so i end up having to turn them off on that site anyway

        And this brave adblock is bad

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah, built in spying extensions.

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    you don't need brave

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      /board

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      /site

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      /shills

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >all these shill replies

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Seriously though I made the switch to Brave from [{"company": "Google", "project": "Chrome"},{"company": "Mozilla", "project": "Firefox"}, {"company": "Microsoft", "project": "Edge"}] and I'm loving it!

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    No, it's a botnet already so you don't have to bother with privacy measures.

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Do I bother disabling Shields and use ublock org?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      shields doesn't support procedural filters
      and ublock is gimped in chromium-based

      you're fricked either way

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Well shit if only there was a chromium browser out there that doesn't have these problems.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Well Mozilla is going to implement V3 too in their browser.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          not the same thing
          https://www.theverge.com/2022/6/10/23131029/
          >For compatibility reasons, Mozilla will still use most of the Manifest V3 spec in Firefox so that extensions can be ported over from Chrome with minimal changes. But, crucially, Firefox will continue to support blocking through Web Request after Google phases it out, enabling the most sophisticated anti-tracking ad blockers to function as normal.
          >In justifying that decision, Mozilla has been clear in recognizing that privacy is a core value for people who use its products, as chief security officer Marshall Erwin told The Verge.
          >“We know content blocking is important to Firefox users and want to ensure they have access to the best privacy tools available,” Erwin said. “In Firefox we block tracking by default but still allow advertisements to load in the browser. If users want to take the additional step to block ads entirely, we think it is important to enable them to do so.”

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        what are procedural filters?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/Procedural-cosmetic-filters

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Honestly though. Why is the browser market so fricked? There is not a single good choice.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >There is not a single good choice.
      dumb moron
      https://waterfox.net/

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        ah yes, the browser owned by a marketing company. very trustworthy indeed anon

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >more pointless fud
          their patchset is public anon, which patch offends you?
          https://github.com/WaterfoxCo/Waterfox/

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Are you ducking moronic anon? You fricking moron!

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Ad money drives the browser market

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      qutebrowser is great

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Use floorp
      https://github.com/Floorp-Projects/Floorp

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      You can just customize Firefox to your liking, works for me

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    uBlock, no. Brave implements blocking natively and is pretty aggressive about it. Thats one of the things I like about it.

    I do use Sponsorblock and ClearURL's though.

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    No. What you need is jshelter for firefox to provide brave's anti-fingerprinting "farbling".
    Thank me later.

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Only Alt-Right Nazis use Brave, chud.

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I just deal with kiwi and it's problems

  11. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    It is impossible to browse the internet without idontcareaboutcookies, so yes

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      fricking worthless yuros ruined the internet by making every single fricking website ever tell you about cookies

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        The eu just cares about your privacy, stupid amerimu--
        https://european-pirateparty.eu/chat-control-leaked-commission-paper-eu-mass-surveillance-plans/ OHNONONONONONONOOOOOOO

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Government is all powerful
          Everyone else is serf

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          I hate EU. israelites was right about Germans

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            This comment is hate speech and therefore illegal in Europe and the UK.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Do you know who run the EU?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Germans. German services to be more clear. And commies. Don't care about some dead israelite. The Ventotene Manifesto is italian for example but the German and French (here I agree, there are some israelites among the French elite) elites holds most of the power, not Italian (but they participate too). The dumbest ideas are always German and they have the most power. They even started a migration crisis to get rid of the UK from EU structures.

            German big business, paid by this big business communist agitators and the services of the current and previous regimes - they all run the EU and making everything worse

  12. 2 years ago
    Mustachioed man named Pig Peeper, whom you have never seen before

    Use Pale Moon and install eMatrix.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      pale moon dev is against ad blockers and he's just a fricking butthole, frick that shit

  13. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    The dirtiest trick Satan ever pulled was convincing internet users that ad hijackers and cyrptominers were browser features and not malware.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *