Guess I have to stick with intel now. Daily reminder that Christians made America great and Atheists turned it (love it or hate it) into what it is today.
>Newton >His discovery precedes Age of Enlightment which results in weakening of faith >Galileo >Got bullied by Christian cabal for pushing heliocentrism
ok
American zionist dispensationalists (look up "dispensationalism exposed", it was created by Freemasons) are not Christians, they're ignorant people duped by brand new doctrines and ideas completely disconnected with the early church and it's fathers.
I typically buy intel processors for my laptops because their integrated graphics are the gold standard for Linux compatibility imo. AMD for desktops and servers because the value is so good, and the recent Genoa line is more than fast enough for any workload that I currently need to deal with.
Right now I prefer AMD. If Intel actually comes out with something that doesn't suck 500 watts to outperform AMD by 10%, maybe I'll buy Intel again. I also think E cores are bullshit.
I buy whatever is best at the time of my upgrade.
I think my next upgrade will be the AMD Ryzen 9000.
AMD for virtualy everything except if you're running a Plex/Jellyfin server. An Intel i3 will have much lower idle power consumption and Quicksync brutally mogs AMF for transcoding
AMD CPU's because they don't cause house fires.
Nvidia GPU's because they're the fastest and who cares about burning your house down I just want high fps.
(no but seriously: Intel is just inefficient crap)
The fact of the matter is that Intel in its current form sucks for my use cases and the Ryzens are better. They were great back during the LGA775s and the early Core i3/i5/i7 models from Sandy Bridge and up but that's in the past now. I buy whatever gives me the best results and getting some AM4 board on 2018 and still be able to upgrade it years later is great
Whatever's more efficient for the price and wattage at the time, brand fanboying is for abjectly dumb fricks. Right now it's AMD until intel wake up from their coma.
Whichever is better right now, has latest technology.
Which is AMD currently. Don't remember when intel did anything beyond new socket. While AMD >more cores >more cache
Pretty cool.
The last time Intel was truly innovative was with Sandy Bridge in 2011. From there it was refreshes and die shrinks while they sat on their laurels until AMD got their shit together with the Ryzens.
Your moronic honkey mom's gonna get her dumb cracker c**t fricked like a stupid prostitute. Go to fricking bed, Billy. It's past your motherfricking curfew, b***h.
(OP)
For CPUs I don't really care.
I just bought a Ryzen 7 7800X3D and that thing slaps for the price. It does like to run hot, that's something I'll have to get used to.
I will never, ever buy an AMD graphics card again, though. I've been burnt one too many times.
Christians only buy Intel.
Guess I have to stick with intel now. Daily reminder that Christians made America great and Atheists turned it (love it or hate it) into what it is today.
Christians are morons
Even Newton and Galileo?
Gravity is not real and heliocentrism is blasphemy.
>Newton
>His discovery precedes Age of Enlightment which results in weakening of faith
>Galileo
>Got bullied by Christian cabal for pushing heliocentrism
ok
They submitted to the church in full fear of getting staked we'd be on alpha centauri right the frick now if it weren't for ~~*abrahamic*~~ subhumans
Look into breakaway civilizations.
especially them homosexuals
American christians cut their dicks and give their salary to Israel.
The Bible doesn't say they have to do that. Talk about picking up bad traditions.
where is in-q-telaviv located
kidding, we know
lust provoking image?
golem
>IF U BUY THIS LOGO UR DIS BUT IF U BUY THIS LOGO UR DAT
It should be legal to euthanize you.
American zionist dispensationalists (look up "dispensationalism exposed", it was created by Freemasons) are not Christians, they're ignorant people duped by brand new doctrines and ideas completely disconnected with the early church and it's fathers.
Both.
Both.
I typically buy intel processors for my laptops because their integrated graphics are the gold standard for Linux compatibility imo. AMD for desktops and servers because the value is so good, and the recent Genoa line is more than fast enough for any workload that I currently need to deal with.
Ayymd is good on Linux too.
Irrelevant time wasting question
>brand loyalty
You need to go back
My computer has both
Qualcomm
Time to buy intel shares again!
I use AMD in my desktop and Intel in my laptop.
7800X3D was compelling but I went with the $400 AUD cheaper 12700KF.
Edom must be made Babylon so that god will smite it.
Daily reminder.
I've got a 5600, but the high idle power consumption sucks.
Cyrix. I don't need more and neither do you
Whichever gives me better gaming performance at the time I build a new PC
Who gives a shit about brand preference?
>why do you have a 13900k ?
pic related is why
Because you're a moron? It's understood, anon.
spoken like a true CPU CACHE HIERARCHY FAULT bootlicker. enjoy your dead l3 cache
Oh nononono Intelsisters how do we cope????
rather have mitigations than a dead pile of rotting shit because its l3 cache likes to die as fast as fruit flies
I bet you'll smell smoke.
AMD on desktop, Intel on laptop. Mobile is the only place where the big.little meme makes sense
I prefer Apple M-series.
intel
Right now I prefer AMD. If Intel actually comes out with something that doesn't suck 500 watts to outperform AMD by 10%, maybe I'll buy Intel again. I also think E cores are bullshit.
I buy whatever is best at the time of my upgrade.
I think my next upgrade will be the AMD Ryzen 9000.
I prefer my AMD Threadripper so I can flex on the poors with all my cores that I don't even use.
I fell for the Memeripper, and they stopped supporting the socket after 1 generation. Won't fall for that shit again.
>MUH SOCKET
Neither did AM1(+), 2, 3 that preceded AM4
Should have bough a real server motherboard instead of cucked market segmented products.
AMD = better hardware
Intel = better software
LGA1700 is a shitshow. ROCm is also a shitshow.
AMD for virtualy everything except if you're running a Plex/Jellyfin server. An Intel i3 will have much lower idle power consumption and Quicksync brutally mogs AMF for transcoding
I prefer whatever best suits my needs at the time of purchase.
AMD CPU's because they don't cause house fires.
Nvidia GPU's because they're the fastest and who cares about burning your house down I just want high fps.
(no but seriously: Intel is just inefficient crap)
The fact of the matter is that Intel in its current form sucks for my use cases and the Ryzens are better. They were great back during the LGA775s and the early Core i3/i5/i7 models from Sandy Bridge and up but that's in the past now. I buy whatever gives me the best results and getting some AM4 board on 2018 and still be able to upgrade it years later is great
>They were great back during the LGA 775s and the early Core i3/i5/i7 models from Sandy Bridge and up
Do you know why?
i prefer vegana
AMD, because they are the only one taking Linux seriously
>cuck cores in a desktop machine
>more cores bad
AMD for CPU
NVIDIA for GPU (only because AI slop and CUDA)
Whatever's more efficient for the price and wattage at the time, brand fanboying is for abjectly dumb fricks. Right now it's AMD until intel wake up from their coma.
Whatever gives me more for my money.
Whichever is better for games. I have a ryzen 5800x3d in my desktop and ryzen 4650u in my thinkpad, cuz AMD won with both.
Last desktop and laptop were Intel
Whichever is better right now, has latest technology.
Which is AMD currently. Don't remember when intel did anything beyond new socket. While AMD
>more cores
>more cache
Pretty cool.
The last time Intel was truly innovative was with Sandy Bridge in 2011. From there it was refreshes and die shrinks while they sat on their laurels until AMD got their shit together with the Ryzens.
More of an Apple Silicon guy myself.
Fricking Nvidia, you motherfricking Black folkucking White b***h.
I prefer the one that gives me more performance per dollar while producing minimal heat.
I had a 2600k for 12 years, it aged like milk with all the mitigations
Your moronic honkey mom's gonna get her dumb cracker c**t fricked like a stupid prostitute. Go to fricking bed, Billy. It's past your motherfricking curfew, b***h.
whichever suits my needs at the time of purchase
(OP)
For CPUs I don't really care.
I just bought a Ryzen 7 7800X3D and that thing slaps for the price. It does like to run hot, that's something I'll have to get used to.
I will never, ever buy an AMD graphics card again, though. I've been burnt one too many times.