>female cells are picky
Yah no shit they have to be. They have to make sure the sperm is from the same species and that it isn't fusing dog sperm or multiple sperm or incel chud sperm. Also to screen for genetic and immunological compatibility.
Like in the macro world you pick a mate who isn't an ugly runt, to pass that image onto your own child. It's only logical evolution began this at a cellular level.
OP you should of been swallowed by your mother , but here you are, best of a poor bunch made it. Your mother's egg must of been drunk like your mother that night also it seems. But at least you were brought up by the internet ... Yeah that didn't work out either.
Same for all gen z. Raised by gay memes conceived by drunken unstructured parents.
This is actually a good point and I bet you a reason why invitro fails so much is the egg is injected with the sperm instead of naturally being fertilized. I have read that they used to use a larger needle which made things fail much more than current practices with smaller ones.
Picky for what exactly?Most humans are born with mediocre genetics meaning the ovum has no clue which sperm contain incredible genetics period. I mean it chose me for frick sake.
Women in general don’t select for intelligence.
Most likely because intelligence isn’t genetic and basically any person with enough time and commitment can become intelligent. Chad doesn’t think it’s worth the trouble.
Interesting. I suppose the livestock industry cattle, pigs, etc, etc where AI use and ambryo transfer is quite widespread are likely building up some interesting problems
Dude this is one of the reason artificial insemination is shit, humans don't understand natural processes, at this rate humans will become very much like those weird breeds of dogs.
difference if reproductive strategies, producing an egg, carrying a child in the womb and raising a child are long energetically expensive activities it doesn't make sense to not be picky this encourages picking the best genes and most capable father
you think being a criminal is true indicator of fitness and of poor fitness? Being strong or charismatic or simply being able to commit crimes and sort of get away with could be enough to appear a good mate to some.
or maybe the animals this model is based on doesn't translate perfectly to humans, our social structure might be too complicated now but in any case my first post was based on basic evolutionary biology
Maybe she seeks out the meth guy with the open sores, missing teeth, and 9% body fat percentage because he's really good at boiling away the "piss" part of the meth when making his homebrewed dose and her ovaries squeal as they release a ripened egg in anticipation. Probably not though. Reproduction isn't a perfect biological event and mistakes happen. Gametes combine and sometimes you get scrambled eggs and downies.
2 years ago
Anonymous
your right every woman's dream is the meth guy with the open sores, missing teeth, and 9% body fat percentage my argument is completely invalid
the only woman who go for guys like that are complete messes themselves, women want the best but only the best they can get given competition
2 years ago
Anonymous
>9% body fat percentage
Kek lard ass burgerstani detected
pregnancy is extremely risky for mothers, especially primate mothers, due to some moronic not fully understood shit that's unique to primates like how fetuses basically hijack the nearest artery of the mother that then gets torn open during birth. there are actually multiple layers of protection for the egg including some spermicidal secretions because the last thing the body of a female wants is to get some deformed piece of shit in their womb they have to feed for 9 months and that will then kill them if even the slightest thing goes wrong
some women actually have such strong defenses that they're almost infertile even if all their eggs are technically viable. it's actually interesting how fricked up human reproduction is and what traits evolution seems to select for because of it.
when are IQfy robotics tards gonna invent sentient sexbots / high quality virtual reality
I'm a medgay so I dont have time to , im counting on you morons
It is very 'expensive' for a female to get pregnant. She must carry another being to term, supplying all its energy and physical needs from her own sources and stores. She must risk death during pregnancy and childbirth. And in many species she must continue to supply energy and attention to the offspring even while it develops after birth - humans being the prime example of this because we are still fetuses at birth (if allowed to develop further, our heads would be too big to pass through the birth canal).
As such, it is advantageous for females to be picky during sperm selection. They only have a few shots at creating offspring that will themselves reproduce successfully, so it's extremely important to their genetic success to get it right.
>It is very 'expensive' for a female to get pregnant
And it's even more expensive to be a father since men are traditionally the providers even after birth. >it is advantageous for females to be picky
The truth is that it is advantageous for males to be picky as well. Unless you are a low-value male that doesn't get any female interest or attention in that case you wouldn't understand. Arguably even more so because a father can never truly be certain that the offspring is his compared to the certainty that a mother knows the fetus developing inside her is most assuredly hers. The male has to make sure the mother of their child they will raise for the majority of the rest of their lives is genetically fit and trustworthy and loyal as much as he is. If he selects poorly and selects a backstabbing bawd then he will have invested everything for nothing biologically speaking as his genes wouldn't get passed on while her genes carry on risk-free. I'm not saying women don't select either but it isn't one-sided as your moronic evolutionary psychology incel pseudoscience bunk suggests.
Note tha I was talking about life in general, not human life. Human sexuality and reproduction is quite more complicated than most species.
I agree that paternal investment can be much greater in humans than most species. However, it is still not as costly to the male as to the female. (Do not get hung up on the words 'costly' and 'expensive'. We are not talking about money here but time, energy, and other resources).
Remember that before modern medicine, childbirth was EXTREMELY dangerous to the female. Even if she did not die in childbirth, she was very limited in how many offspring she could create. On the other hand, men like Genghis Khan existed with literally thousands of offspring.
Paternal investment is largely determined by the strategy of the father. Genghis Khan took a high risk path that paid off for him, but was much more likely to get him killed without reproducing at all. Another strategy is high investment in a single spouse and limited offspring. This is more likely to guarantee at least one offspring, but you won't hit the jackpot like Genghis. Even if the worst happens and you get cucked and invest in another man's kid, you will probably get at least one kid of your own to adulthood.
>evil is in the genes
>female cells are picky
Yah no shit they have to be. They have to make sure the sperm is from the same species and that it isn't fusing dog sperm or multiple sperm or incel chud sperm. Also to screen for genetic and immunological compatibility.
give that egg an IG and OF and it will spread wide open for $
genetics.
Microscopic rape I see.
As above, so below.
Like in the macro world you pick a mate who isn't an ugly runt, to pass that image onto your own child. It's only logical evolution began this at a cellular level.
OP you should of been swallowed by your mother , but here you are, best of a poor bunch made it. Your mother's egg must of been drunk like your mother that night also it seems. But at least you were brought up by the internet ... Yeah that didn't work out either.
Same for all gen z. Raised by gay memes conceived by drunken unstructured parents.
This is actually a good point and I bet you a reason why invitro fails so much is the egg is injected with the sperm instead of naturally being fertilized. I have read that they used to use a larger needle which made things fail much more than current practices with smaller ones.
The patriarchy raping all those poor eggs!!
No is NO!! My biochemistry my choice!
incel thread
Picky for what exactly?Most humans are born with mediocre genetics meaning the ovum has no clue which sperm contain incredible genetics period. I mean it chose me for frick sake.
Women in general don’t select for intelligence.
Most likely because intelligence isn’t genetic and basically any person with enough time and commitment can become intelligent. Chad doesn’t think it’s worth the trouble.
https://looksmax.org/threads/women-dont-give-a-shit-about-intelligence.305436/
The eggs that aren't picky are the ones that come out moronic to some degree.
Funny fact but closer related sperm has an easier job of getting through
So anything born of IVF is naturally inferior?
Those kids end up with higher rates of childhood cancers. It's a failsafe at best, but not a great one.
So pen0s in vag00 is the safest way...
Yeah. When both parents are at a healthy age for reproduction it's optimal. Almost like we were made for it.
Thats why only naturally bred horses are allowed in thoroughbred horse racing.
Interesting. I suppose the livestock industry cattle, pigs, etc, etc where AI use and ambryo transfer is quite widespread are likely building up some interesting problems
spermcel thread
Alternatively: freeze a shitload of sperm and bathe the ovaries in artifical cum.
>source: a private WhatsApp chat
Is this the next level after twitter imposing too much peer review?
as legit as your climate change and covid sooience
Dude this is one of the reason artificial insemination is shit, humans don't understand natural processes, at this rate humans will become very much like those weird breeds of dogs.
Have you ever seen this?
difference if reproductive strategies, producing an egg, carrying a child in the womb and raising a child are long energetically expensive activities it doesn't make sense to not be picky this encourages picking the best genes and most capable father
if that was true then no women would ever frick a criminal
you think being a criminal is true indicator of fitness and of poor fitness? Being strong or charismatic or simply being able to commit crimes and sort of get away with could be enough to appear a good mate to some.
or maybe the animals this model is based on doesn't translate perfectly to humans, our social structure might be too complicated now but in any case my first post was based on basic evolutionary biology
Maybe she seeks out the meth guy with the open sores, missing teeth, and 9% body fat percentage because he's really good at boiling away the "piss" part of the meth when making his homebrewed dose and her ovaries squeal as they release a ripened egg in anticipation. Probably not though. Reproduction isn't a perfect biological event and mistakes happen. Gametes combine and sometimes you get scrambled eggs and downies.
your right every woman's dream is the meth guy with the open sores, missing teeth, and 9% body fat percentage my argument is completely invalid
the only woman who go for guys like that are complete messes themselves, women want the best but only the best they can get given competition
>9% body fat percentage
Kek lard ass burgerstani detected
Mental illness tends to skew good decision making skills.
jesus christ I hate what this site has become
pregnancy is extremely risky for mothers, especially primate mothers, due to some moronic not fully understood shit that's unique to primates like how fetuses basically hijack the nearest artery of the mother that then gets torn open during birth. there are actually multiple layers of protection for the egg including some spermicidal secretions because the last thing the body of a female wants is to get some deformed piece of shit in their womb they have to feed for 9 months and that will then kill them if even the slightest thing goes wrong
some women actually have such strong defenses that they're almost infertile even if all their eggs are technically viable. it's actually interesting how fricked up human reproduction is and what traits evolution seems to select for because of it.
fascinating
Then how come woman get gregnent?
shut the frick up femorroid
feels good to be an incel in 2022
when are IQfy robotics tards gonna invent sentient sexbots / high quality virtual reality
I'm a medgay so I dont have time to , im counting on you morons
>WHY?!
It is very 'expensive' for a female to get pregnant. She must carry another being to term, supplying all its energy and physical needs from her own sources and stores. She must risk death during pregnancy and childbirth. And in many species she must continue to supply energy and attention to the offspring even while it develops after birth - humans being the prime example of this because we are still fetuses at birth (if allowed to develop further, our heads would be too big to pass through the birth canal).
As such, it is advantageous for females to be picky during sperm selection. They only have a few shots at creating offspring that will themselves reproduce successfully, so it's extremely important to their genetic success to get it right.
>what is rape
>women actually choose in nature
>nature is a selection free space that lets women pick and choose
lmao
Please make an actual point in English that I can respond to.
so picky they end up single mothers
>It is very 'expensive' for a female to get pregnant
And it's even more expensive to be a father since men are traditionally the providers even after birth.
>it is advantageous for females to be picky
The truth is that it is advantageous for males to be picky as well. Unless you are a low-value male that doesn't get any female interest or attention in that case you wouldn't understand. Arguably even more so because a father can never truly be certain that the offspring is his compared to the certainty that a mother knows the fetus developing inside her is most assuredly hers. The male has to make sure the mother of their child they will raise for the majority of the rest of their lives is genetically fit and trustworthy and loyal as much as he is. If he selects poorly and selects a backstabbing bawd then he will have invested everything for nothing biologically speaking as his genes wouldn't get passed on while her genes carry on risk-free. I'm not saying women don't select either but it isn't one-sided as your moronic evolutionary psychology incel pseudoscience bunk suggests.
Note tha I was talking about life in general, not human life. Human sexuality and reproduction is quite more complicated than most species.
I agree that paternal investment can be much greater in humans than most species. However, it is still not as costly to the male as to the female. (Do not get hung up on the words 'costly' and 'expensive'. We are not talking about money here but time, energy, and other resources).
Remember that before modern medicine, childbirth was EXTREMELY dangerous to the female. Even if she did not die in childbirth, she was very limited in how many offspring she could create. On the other hand, men like Genghis Khan existed with literally thousands of offspring.
Paternal investment is largely determined by the strategy of the father. Genghis Khan took a high risk path that paid off for him, but was much more likely to get him killed without reproducing at all. Another strategy is high investment in a single spouse and limited offspring. This is more likely to guarantee at least one offspring, but you won't hit the jackpot like Genghis. Even if the worst happens and you get cucked and invest in another man's kid, you will probably get at least one kid of your own to adulthood.
It's membrane compatibility. in order for the ovum to properly divide utself it needs opttimised dna harmonics