>Everyone is female, and everyone hates it.
Is this true, c/lit/?
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
>Everyone is female, and everyone hates it.
Is this true, c/lit/?
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
To Yujiro Hanma, Everyone is female. So i guess they weren't far off.
>Everyone is female
Let me guess, this was arrived to through long and tedious sophistry?
I don't know what that means, but I'm ok with my "intuitive" side. I'm so "good" with it, that I even managed to solve a math problem with it, actually it was a physics one and it had a weird calculation, and I literally solved it instantaneously by "gut", of course I wouldn't completely trust it, but I enjoy playing around with this side of mine.
This isn't a bad essay on the subject: https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/arts-letters/articles/the-long-goodbye-andrea-long-chu
Chu seems to be arguing for some rehashed Freudianism: i.e. isn't it likely that untold numbers of men have desired to be a woman, most likely a young comely one, at some point in their lives, likely in adolescence or early twenties, if only for a limited time in order experience above all else female sensual pleasure? Not that they'd necessarily wish to make a habit of it, but as an occasional or weekend sort of thing: meaning they'd want to be the real deal if it were somehow magically possible.
And this is literally what gets into some weird shit, he transitioned because of his girlfriend, and became she.
>female sensual pleasure
How is it any different from a man's?
" Although it is generally reported that women do not experience a refractory period and can thus experience an additional orgasm (or multiple orgasms) ..."
Men can do this as well. May be easier for men than most women.
No, its not, it's basically an impossibility for men unless they're engaged in homoerotic pursuits. Basically female sexuality has remained at the juvenile state of development.
There's nothing homosexual about being pegged by a woman using her girlwiener. Except that having sex with women is homosexualry.
you can repress ejaculation with minor orgasm, and continue having sex, also people have different refractory rates I've had sex 6-7 times in one night but your dick takes a beating after awhile from grinding against the pelvic bones
If you're serious you evidently have absolutely no clue that female orgasm is qualitatively different and more intense than a man's
Any evidence for this claim? Certainly the scientific account contradicts your assertion. E.g. similar description and brain activation.
Uh no, I would be ok with getting pregnant, because I'm curious, and I have done most things man, so whatever, I don't care, it is not like I love my dick.
Now what are the chances that someone like that ends up regretting this whole shit?
Lacan's phallus is unattainable and impossible, so everyone is a female incel.
troony shit.
Let me guess, the author falls back on "Masculinity is... le performative" then repeats it for 300 pages.
Everybody is born being female. Men have the female spirit in a male body.
This is why men keep putting women on pedestal. Men live to compete and provide for women.
The ideal life for a man is to have the life of a woman: just by existing, coasting thru life, being adorned by numerous female orbiters devoted to him. But still wanting to give lots of free orgasms to every female simping for him KEK.
This makes 99% of the population female in mind and 50% female in body. Only very very few men manage to escape the female condition.
Right, a man more interested in giving orgasms to women than receiving them is sorta behaving like a lesbian, maybe.
Stfu
Retroactively refuted by Aristotle (pbuh)
It's an interesting read but what are the conclusions? If a "female" is not the same as a woman, but rather basically a sissy bawd (sissy hypno turned the author trans), and there's this dark desire for both men and women to become female (death drive yada yada), what ought one to do - affirm it? I know it might be an unpopular opinion rn, but the classic self-respecting feminist would want to be as far away from the degrading image of the female, and for all to affirm it is but the gooned troony's projection…
A theory is that this is effectively the father's ghost's psychological revenge upon the son for having strayed too far from the religiously conservative paternal ideal, effectively it tells the son, "for having broken trust between us by becoming a degenerate consumer of Sissy Porn you are forever condemned to bear its mark upon your psyche, nay perhaps even upon your bodily form."
From the name I was expecting some cute chinese lady
No. For a man, female existence is permanently in the past. He was once a female in utero, but he evolved past it, and so he forever regards the feminine as inferior. It reminds him of a time he was not part of this world. It's why some men who wish to die cope by becoming trannies, theu think they can devolve themselves into the prior state, away from the burden of masculinity. Transitioning is an act of suicide.