It's the same shit on Android, people will close apps from the bakcground and that just means they'll start again and waste resources in restarting. Remember those Android RAM cleaners that actually wasted more energy than they saved?
Foreground and background apps on Android are at least separate.
If you close the foreground it doesn't close the background. Background activities stay running unless you go into the app settings and do a force stop, which most people won't do (but those apps may have done).
that's not how OCD works tho - now that you know closing apps is worse than keeping them open your OCD will let it go.
just like how OCD people who use automated lighting software stop having to check if the lights are on, they just check the app and see if they're on or not.
you're just stupid.
calling the person who just puts the phone in their pocket after finishing their work a moron is a lil absurd but i'll go with your premise.
just put the phone in your pocket moron, what are you minmaxing battery life for - no one is calling/texting you anyways
The apps you see in that interface are mostly not running at all. At most the last two apps you ran are kept hot, the next few are suspended, and then the rest are killed and the image you see is just a screenshot kept in memory.
Theoretically, if you regularly swipe away all apps it could be clearing cached UI shit or something? But unless you’re constantly killing off every app it would basically change nothing. Swiping the apps away only actually does anything for most recent apps. Maybe they’re talking about people who exit an app, then immediately kill it, then reopen it shortly afterwards?
All of these troony apps always drain battery, I have to kill them all then run android janny to force all apps into deep sleep with no chance to wake up until I open it manually or my battery literally doesn't last a day.
it's referring to go into the app switcher and closing them usually by pushing them off the screen, useful if the app is unresponsive or something, but not something you should be doing for no reason
Okay, I'm actually trying to figure out if these jouranlists are actually braindead or something. OP's shitty ass article
https://www.unilad.com/technology/apple-closing-apps-iphones-loses-battery-life-333600-20240418
doesn't even list sources. The closest thing you can get is this >John Gruber, a gadget-focused journalist, offered further insight on the blog Daring Fireball into why closing apps can actually be bad for your battery.
which leads to a fricking blog post from 2017
https://daringfireball.net/2017/07/you_should_not_force_quit_apps
which is a shit take on a fricking email from 2016
https://www.macrumors.com/2016/03/10/force-quitting-apps-doesnt-help-battery/
What the frick is even going on. Is this some AI-SEO article bullshit? Why the frick are articles from 8 years ago making headlines now?
>https://discussions.apple.com/thread/255103186?answerId=259492245022&sortBy=best#259492245022
yeah little zoom zoom, knowing the name of homosexual who posted this is totally not relevant not useful, you totally cannot now look up things on him and find out what his goals are
1 week ago
Anonymous
holy shit your search engine sucks massive gay balls. if it could actually do "AI magic" it would have found the actual source of this fricking bullshit here
https://discussions.apple.com/docs/DOC-13491
since it was actually sourced properly in the tweaktown article
https://www.tweaktown.com/news/97785/apple-confirms-swiping-apps-closed-doesnt-save-you-battery-life/index.html
seems like kagi search is fricking worse than a street shitter using google.
1 week ago
Anonymous
I didn't read your post as it's too long for my taste but basically I didn't read the article, I didn't even read half of this thread, and I already got the essence of it all by using Kagi and I will continue using it.
1 week ago
Anonymous
you didn't get the essence of it you fricking brainlet since your search engine is shittier than ask.com from a decade ago.
1 week ago
Anonymous
It seems like you're too low IQ to comprehend why you're wrong despite me telling you in as few words as possible.
1 week ago
Anonymous
you couldn't even comprehend that the article is literally AI-SEO bullshit using sources from 2016. you just slurped up a literal bullshit fricking article because your AI search engine couldn't even tell the article is fricking bullshit
1 week ago
Anonymous
no I actually posted proof that it finds sources easily
>https://discussions.apple.com/thread/255103186?answerId=259492245022&sortBy=best#259492245022
yeah little zoom zoom, knowing the name of homosexual who posted this is totally not relevant not useful, you totally cannot now look up things on him and find out what his goals are
, and you're literally too low IQ to use it.
Source: Lawrence Finch
It's really that simple and I think you might be exceptionally severely degenerated in your cranium.
1 week ago
Anonymous
you posted a literal fricking who who commented two fricking sentences on a public forum. it's like quoting anon
absolutely bullshit
that it's absolutely bullshit. jesus fricking christ you dumb fricking zoomers and your useless ass search engines are going to be the death fo the universe
1 week ago
Anonymous
>literal fricking who
He has enough money to buy your family tree's genocide and cover it all up to general public so it's like you never existed and he says things like that, but I guess you're just too low IQ to grasp what's going on because you have been mindbroken by the fact that computer can read and comprehend text faster than you.
1 week ago
Anonymous
>He has enough money
doubt it if he couldn't even keep up with his fricking mensa dues KEK
1 week ago
Anonymous
>2021
yeah I would've left too
1 week ago
Anonymous
and miss out on your 50th anniversay at mensa? quite the low IQ take.
1 week ago
Anonymous
yes some things are worth more in life than irrelevant anniversaries but you wouldn't understand why even if I explained it
1 week ago
Anonymous
>if I explained it
you literally can't without your shitty AI search engine to do it for you KEK
1 week ago
Anonymous
but I already did it's just that your contextual awareness is a bit, for the lack of the better word, AI-like
1 week ago
Anonymous
The search engine part of Kagi is actually pretty decent, I don’t use the AI shit from it, but evidently brainlets who think AI is good at sourcing anything don’t make for good representatives.
1 week ago
Anonymous
search engines were sourcing things for over 30 years but ChatGPT cannot do this, it's just not possible midwitsisters...
>https://discussions.apple.com/thread/255103186?answerId=259492245022&sortBy=best#259492245022
yeah little zoom zoom, knowing the name of homosexual who posted this is totally not relevant not useful, you totally cannot now look up things on him and find out what his goals are
you really pay 25 dollars a month to have some algo do what you can do with your mind and a lil scrolling?
calling the person who just puts the phone in their pocket after finishing their work a moron is a lil absurd but i'll go with your premise.
just put the phone in your pocket moron, what are you minmaxing battery life for - no one is calling/texting you anyways
>puts phone in pocket after finishing work
jobless zoomer, in work phones are strictly prohibited, turned off and back in the locker where you aren't constantly looking at them, when you get a real job, you will know.
I only use my phone for e-mails like twice a day if I'm not in front of my computer, make phone calls, the occasional photography and once every blue moon an app to check a bank account.
I don't think it makes any difference because how little I use it, but maybe I'm wrong.
>reload shit vs just make it hinder
Its like leaving your car idle for few minutes
absolutely bullshit
It's the same shit on Android, people will close apps from the bakcground and that just means they'll start again and waste resources in restarting. Remember those Android RAM cleaners that actually wasted more energy than they saved?
Foreground and background apps on Android are at least separate.
If you close the foreground it doesn't close the background. Background activities stay running unless you go into the app settings and do a force stop, which most people won't do (but those apps may have done).
Frick. This sounds like a battle I cannot win, my OCD to close unused apps vs. my need to prolonged battery life.
that's not how OCD works tho - now that you know closing apps is worse than keeping them open your OCD will let it go.
just like how OCD people who use automated lighting software stop having to check if the lights are on, they just check the app and see if they're on or not.
you're just stupid.
but not closing apps is always worse, moron
calling the person who just puts the phone in their pocket after finishing their work a moron is a lil absurd but i'll go with your premise.
just put the phone in your pocket moron, what are you minmaxing battery life for - no one is calling/texting you anyways
If it loses performance it just needs to get throw on the wall a few times till it works again. Works with every phone BTW.
The apps you see in that interface are mostly not running at all. At most the last two apps you ran are kept hot, the next few are suspended, and then the rest are killed and the image you see is just a screenshot kept in memory.
Theoretically, if you regularly swipe away all apps it could be clearing cached UI shit or something? But unless you’re constantly killing off every app it would basically change nothing. Swiping the apps away only actually does anything for most recent apps. Maybe they’re talking about people who exit an app, then immediately kill it, then reopen it shortly afterwards?
>Maybe they’re talking about people who exit an app, then immediately kill it, then reopen it shortly afterwards?
ADHD zoomie moment
The only reason I close apps is because I don't want to preserve state. I want to start from beginning always
Would you also like to do that with your life?
yes..
All of these troony apps always drain battery, I have to kill them all then run android janny to force all apps into deep sleep with no chance to wake up until I open it manually or my battery literally doesn't last a day.
Closed apps are tombstoned and stored frozen on the hard drive, then put back into memory when opened again in the same state.
Force-closed app are launched from scratch, reloading all their data, going online to sync shit and do all kinds of things.
It's seriously baffling these sorts of stories are still being written, iOS has behaved like this for over a decade.
>not force-closing apps kills your internal storage life
geg
This is like asking Elon Musk if Teslas run over african americans
What does that mean to "swipe apps closed"?
sounds like itoddler speak for closing an app
it's referring to go into the app switcher and closing them usually by pushing them off the screen, useful if the app is unresponsive or something, but not something you should be doing for no reason
Okay, I'm actually trying to figure out if these jouranlists are actually braindead or something. OP's shitty ass article
https://www.unilad.com/technology/apple-closing-apps-iphones-loses-battery-life-333600-20240418
doesn't even list sources. The closest thing you can get is this
>John Gruber, a gadget-focused journalist, offered further insight on the blog Daring Fireball into why closing apps can actually be bad for your battery.
which leads to a fricking blog post from 2017
https://daringfireball.net/2017/07/you_should_not_force_quit_apps
which is a shit take on a fricking email from 2016
https://www.macrumors.com/2016/03/10/force-quitting-apps-doesnt-help-battery/
What the frick is even going on. Is this some AI-SEO article bullshit? Why the frick are articles from 8 years ago making headlines now?
stop wasting your time on trying to parse shitty articles by hand
frick off with your shitty ass AI SEO bullshit that can't even parse a website correctly. none of those sources are fricking relevant to the topic.
>https://discussions.apple.com/thread/255103186?answerId=259492245022&sortBy=best#259492245022
yeah little zoom zoom, knowing the name of homosexual who posted this is totally not relevant not useful, you totally cannot now look up things on him and find out what his goals are
holy shit your search engine sucks massive gay balls. if it could actually do "AI magic" it would have found the actual source of this fricking bullshit here
https://discussions.apple.com/docs/DOC-13491
since it was actually sourced properly in the tweaktown article
https://www.tweaktown.com/news/97785/apple-confirms-swiping-apps-closed-doesnt-save-you-battery-life/index.html
seems like kagi search is fricking worse than a street shitter using google.
I didn't read your post as it's too long for my taste but basically I didn't read the article, I didn't even read half of this thread, and I already got the essence of it all by using Kagi and I will continue using it.
you didn't get the essence of it you fricking brainlet since your search engine is shittier than ask.com from a decade ago.
It seems like you're too low IQ to comprehend why you're wrong despite me telling you in as few words as possible.
you couldn't even comprehend that the article is literally AI-SEO bullshit using sources from 2016. you just slurped up a literal bullshit fricking article because your AI search engine couldn't even tell the article is fricking bullshit
no I actually posted proof that it finds sources easily
, and you're literally too low IQ to use it.
Source: Lawrence Finch
It's really that simple and I think you might be exceptionally severely degenerated in your cranium.
you posted a literal fricking who who commented two fricking sentences on a public forum. it's like quoting anon
that it's absolutely bullshit. jesus fricking christ you dumb fricking zoomers and your useless ass search engines are going to be the death fo the universe
>literal fricking who
He has enough money to buy your family tree's genocide and cover it all up to general public so it's like you never existed and he says things like that, but I guess you're just too low IQ to grasp what's going on because you have been mindbroken by the fact that computer can read and comprehend text faster than you.
>He has enough money
doubt it if he couldn't even keep up with his fricking mensa dues KEK
>2021
yeah I would've left too
and miss out on your 50th anniversay at mensa? quite the low IQ take.
yes some things are worth more in life than irrelevant anniversaries but you wouldn't understand why even if I explained it
>if I explained it
you literally can't without your shitty AI search engine to do it for you KEK
but I already did it's just that your contextual awareness is a bit, for the lack of the better word, AI-like
The search engine part of Kagi is actually pretty decent, I don’t use the AI shit from it, but evidently brainlets who think AI is good at sourcing anything don’t make for good representatives.
search engines were sourcing things for over 30 years but ChatGPT cannot do this, it's just not possible midwitsisters...
you really pay 25 dollars a month to have some algo do what you can do with your mind and a lil scrolling?
>pay for something free
I don't understand.
>puts phone in pocket after finishing work
jobless zoomer, in work phones are strictly prohibited, turned off and back in the locker where you aren't constantly looking at them, when you get a real job, you will know.
Itoddlers btfo? Yes or no?
I only use my phone for e-mails like twice a day if I'm not in front of my computer, make phone calls, the occasional photography and once every blue moon an app to check a bank account.
I don't think it makes any difference because how little I use it, but maybe I'm wrong.
when you use it this little, force killing apps makes a big difference
Unused RAM is wasted RAM
>making your device do something rather than have things sit idly in ram uses electricity
damn
>sit idly in RAM
RAM requires constant refreshing or it starts bitrotting in seconds