>eye for an eye
>war of conquest of promised land
>chosen people
OT is based.
NT is hippie commie shit
 It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
 |
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
>eye for an eye >war of conquest of promised land >chosen people OT is based. NT is hippie commie shit
>rabbis cutting foreskin and sucking baby dick
>prophecy about weapons being destroyed and lambs and wolves living together
>make oaths by putting your hand under a "man's thigh" (euphemism for touching his dick)
>kill babies because your schizo voices aren't strong enough to kill them on their own
The OT is cringy, not manly.
Sucking the blood isn't a practice recorded in the written Torah. It's one of the things mentioned in the Oral Torah.
>making shit up because you can't get laid
You're the cringelord.
Anyone can verify for himself what I wrote. Dilate.
I verified the "rabbis cutting foreskin and sucking baby dick" in the OT, and it's not there. What now?
I didn't say the bloodsucking part was in the OT, learn to read. The tradition goes back to ancient times and doesn't need to be written in the OT, israelites have other books. Cope.
>I didn't say the bloodsucking part was in the OT, learn to read.
Yes you did lmfao
I put a bunch of facts related to judaism, and used them all to adress OP's claim that the OT is based. The tradition of metzizah b'peh didn't originate from thin air, and is on par with making oaths by touching someone's dick. If you're not smart enough to understand this, eating burgers might be easier for your tiny brain to process so do that instead.
>I put a bunch of facts related to judaism, and used them all to adress OP's claim that the OT is based.
Right, so you did claim it comes from the OT.
Is it based to have one's foreskin cut off? Obviously not. I put that fact and figured I might as well mention the sucking part, which is even more cringy. Any normal person would have understood that quickly enough, but it seems your israelite autism was sorely triggered, which isn't my problem.
But you did claim mezizah b'peh was in the OT.
Go suck your troony bf homosexual.
Why are rightoids so obsessed with trannies?
You will never eat the rich
I still have never seen a right wing guy who looks like this, I have seen guys who look like the basedjak though! that's why its actually popular.
Rent free
>make oaths by putting your hand under a "man's thigh" (euphemism for touching his dick)
Source?
https://outlawbiblestudent.org/put-your-hand-under-my-thigh-what-is-that-all-about/
>NT is hippie commie shit
NT is literally a slave manual written by Rome. Every command from Jesus is in line with pacifying slaves.
~~* *~~
I strongly agree.
Judaism is an incredibly based religion. They even preemptively filtered casuals and coomers like me by making you chop your foreskin off if you want to convert, truly they thought of everything.
https://www.chick.com/products/tract?stk=0014
I'mma just leavae this here
You only think that because you are too lazy to learn Aramaic and read the original. This little verse refutes all idea that he was a hippie:
ܠܐ ܬܣܒܪܘܢ ܕܐܬܝܬ ܕܐܪܡܐ ܫܝܢܐ ܒܐܪܥܐ ܠܐ ܐܬܝܬ ܕܐܪܡܐ ܫܝܢܐ ܐܠܐ ܚܪܒܐ
Please translate mr assyrian man.
ܗܝܼ ܟܵܠܕ ܝܘܼ ܐܲ ܦ݂ܵܓܓܘܿܬ
This is the Aramaic version of Matthew 10:34. The word for "sword" can also mean "slaughter, vengeance, killing" so this verse can also be interpreted as "I did not come to bring peace, but slaughter/vengeance."
I'm not Assyrian btw.
Ah, shit, I confused you with the Assyrian Christian anon we get from time to time.
Isn't the Aramaic/Syriac NT just a translation from the Greek though?
There’s an old scholar who claimed that there is an Aramaic Bible that dates to 78 AD, it hasn’t been located yet however
Supposedly that's what Jerome's non-Latin, non-Greek source was. Hebrew version doesn't show up until the Masoretes around 800 AD and the DSS is a state supported fraud.