Faulkner

I’ve read his four major works and here’s how I would rank them:
1. Absalom, Absalom!
2. The Sound and the Fury
3. As I Lay Dying
4. Light in August
but I thoroughly enjoyed all of them. Obviously Faulkner is famous for his experimentation but it never gets in the way of an interesting story, which is what makes him fun as frick to read. Which of his other books should I read next?

Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68

UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68

Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68

  1. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    I would recommend next you check out the collection (taken as a whole) Go Down, Moses which is at the same tier as Absalom and Sound and the Fury IMO.

    A great secondary work on Faulkner is Faulkner, Mississippi by Edouard Glissant

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      Thanks. I also hear a lot about the Snopes trilogy: how would you compare that to his most acclaimed works?

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        Have not read it yet so can't say

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        It's good but the middle volume kinda sags. The last volume was his penultimate novel and feels like a valedictorian. Then he wrote his actual final novel which is a comfy road trip comedy.

    • 9 months ago
      gigachad

      thirded

  2. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Which of his other books should I read next?
    His collected short stories, the Snopes trilogy, and also Sanctuary . I want to read his detective stuff but I don't know if it's good

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      Oh and also The Wild Palms

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      what detective stuff?

  3. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    Avoid. Can't write for shit.

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      Filtered

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      Oh, the irony.

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        Filtered

        Kill youselves cucks.

        • 9 months ago
          Anonymous

          no u

        • 9 months ago
          Anonymous

          Haha you mad

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      Filtered

  4. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    >1. Absalom, Absalom!
    I wholeheartedly agree. It had everything Faulkner in it. I use the word indefatigable as a result of this novel. Thanks, Bill.

  5. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    >As I Lay Dying
    >Sound and Fury
    Love them
    >Absalom, Absalom
    >Light in August
    Tried, but couldn't stomach them. Faulkner unleashed his full powers in those but I preferred the restraint of the former two.

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      Light in August is pretty straightforward compared to As I Lay Dying and TS&TF

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        Narrative and stylistically, sure, but every word in Sound and Dying count. Light felt very turgid to me. Couldn't get into it. Personal failing, I know, but you can't love all of them.

        • 9 months ago
          Anonymous

          I felt the same way besides the Joe Christmas parts those were good.

          I could not get into Sanctuary at all but absolutely love the other big 3.

  6. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    Only thing Faulkner experimented with is ways of reaching the top shelf.

  7. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    Absalom, Absalom! be like
    >fever dream opening chapter
    >insanity for the middle 90% of each chapter
    >profound storytelling told at the beginning 5% and ending 5% of each chapter that would be run of the mill slop if not parsed out through the fever dream that was the middle 90%
    probably the greatest Southern novel ever written, though just behind Moby Dick in terms of the American Novel

  8. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Unidentified participant: Sir, when you are reading for your own pleasure, which authors do you consistently return to?

    >William Faulkner: The ones I came to love when I was eighteen, nineteen, twenty years old. Moby-Dick, the Old Testament, Shakespeare, a lot of Conrad, Dickens. I read Don Quixote every year.

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      But which translation of Don Quixote did he read?

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        Ormsby, maybe? It was popular back then from what I’ve read

        • 9 months ago
          Anonymous

          Norton Critical Editions published a revision of Ormsby's translation in 1981 that can be purchased used.

          • 9 months ago
            Anonymous

            Review from Amazon

          • 9 months ago
            Anonymous

            Seems like that seals the translation deal for don quixote

  9. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    i genuinely cant take his forced cruel southern archetypes and self importance seriously. the experimental structures also sort of force him to be very in your face about exposition. his novels are way better than his awful short stories though.

  10. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    hemingway is better

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      as toilet paper, yea.

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        Both are toilet paper

        • 9 months ago
          Anonymous

          Faulkner is great. Closest thing America has to Shakespeare.

          • 9 months ago
            Anonymous

            Shakespeare is part of the American literary heritage as we were an English colony prior to the Revolution.

          • 9 months ago
            Anonymous

            America’s own Shakespeare, I meant. Shakespeare is a universal.

          • 9 months ago
            Anonymous

            Lol. Faulkner is garbage for manchildren. That's like comparing Joyce to Tom Clancy. Frick off Dumbass.

          • 9 months ago
            Anonymous

            Filtered

          • 9 months ago
            Anonymous

            and then anon was a fish

            have a nice day delusional cucks.

          • 9 months ago
            Anonymous

            wouldn't you ruther have some bananas

          • 9 months ago
            Anonymous

            and then anon was a fish

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      Faulkner is an artist, Hemingway is an entertainer.

  11. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    Faulkner filtered people so hard that he didn't win his Nobel prize until a 'collected works' edition was published.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *