just click "New Application Guard window" in the menu. note that you will lose some features like hw acceleration. This is for high security applications, like when visiting external sites in enterprises. It also requires Hyper-V to be enabled, obviously.
Up to date Black person software ? In Windows 95 you can program an up to date browser that's faster than the claims of OPS Black folkHIT software he uses. Will most of you do it? No why. Because you Black folk can't do shit without templates and are moronic Black personmonkeys
Windows 95 doesn't have modern SSL support (not to mention it has a nonexistant security model in general) and browsers are literally as complicated as modern kernels+userspace combined. So yes, most people won't bother to do that.
Do you understand the concept of what programming is. Regardless if the win 95 OS doesn't support SSL you can write it into it you technological ignorant chinkBlack personisraelite .
Why do the devs insist on using snapd? At first it was "it's easier for the package maintainers" argument, but now it's taking them enough time to fix their shit that it's the same as it was before or worse.
Well, not all snaps are insanely slow. Yes, they're slower than plain old deb packages cause there's some snap overhead, but Firefox took like 400% performance hit (especially with startup) when they pushed it as a snap.
Some are usable, but some programs really don't work well with it.
Holy frick when are they going to just drop that shit. It starts basically instantly on fedora as a good ol' rpm, I don't see what was wrong with Firefox as deb other than it was maybe too fast to start up.
That shit took like 10 or 15s last time I tried Ubuntu, thought it didn't register the first enter, so I tried again, then after like 10s it screamed I tried opening two windows.
firefox already takes 5 seconds to start from my 12 year old HDD, no ubuntu or snap included though
>Test machine: AMD Ryzen 5, 8GB RAM, Vega 8 graphics, NVMe PCIe 256GB drive
Intel Celeron B815 with SATA here on some old Hitachi drive...
Jewbuntu would take me like 2 minutes just to boot
Now you know the power of snapd.
multiprocessing and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race
Ubuntu is only going to get worse form here.
my firefox starts in less than 1 second
Is that an ironic tweet? I can't imagine anyone thinking that this is even close to acceptable
Chrome opens instantly for me on windows btw.
Yeah because chrome runs a daemon in the background and just opens a client when you click the icon, enjoy your RAT
You can disable that in the settings and it still starts that fast on a modern machine. 5 seconds is insane.
firefox doesn't take 5 seconds to open, moron. This is a specific issue with their snap package.
He never said it was Firefox's fault
I am enjoying it.
Good thing I use fedora.
Niklaus Wirth was right
Software slows down faster than computers speed up
>Niklaus Wirth was right
The Pascal/Oberon/Modula guy?
in multiple ways, too. not only is the throughput of most software pathetic, the latency of software AND hardware is out of control.
Snap is fricking goddamn pathetic, even for Linux.
it opens instantly if you are not using snap. wow.
jesus that's slow
>That's right, folks firefox now starts in ~5 seconds!
wait, what the frick is "folks firefox"?
An alt-right fork of Firefox
a browser made in 3rd Reich under direct supervision of adolf hitler himself
the same story with Volkswagen
Ah yes, who doesn't remember good old Volks Feuerfuchs
No. Stop being SJW woke homosexual troony company and I'll be impressed.
5 seconds start time is irrelevant.
on Windows Edge with WDAG can start in 5 seconds. and that involves a separate kernel isolated by a hypervisor..
I would love to know more
just click "New Application Guard window" in the menu. note that you will lose some features like hw acceleration. This is for high security applications, like when visiting external sites in enterprises. It also requires Hyper-V to be enabled, obviously.
esl moment
My firefox is instant start on windows 11.
Up to date proprietary software wins again.
Up to date Black person software ? In Windows 95 you can program an up to date browser that's faster than the claims of OPS Black folkHIT software he uses. Will most of you do it? No why. Because you Black folk can't do shit without templates and are moronic Black personmonkeys
Windows 95 doesn't have modern SSL support (not to mention it has a nonexistant security model in general) and browsers are literally as complicated as modern kernels+userspace combined. So yes, most people won't bother to do that.
Do you understand the concept of what programming is. Regardless if the win 95 OS doesn't support SSL you can write it into it you technological ignorant chinkBlack personisraelite .
>Windows 95 doesn't have modern SSL support
it does if you compile openssl
Lmao 5 seconds. Jesus that embarassing, they should just stop. Imagine "improving" your software by making it 10 times slower
Firefox started in four seconds on low tier windows xp hardware
Why are we going backwards??
>~5 seconds
Jesus fricking christ.
firefox starts in 0.5 seconds on my mint craptop
Why do the devs insist on using snapd? At first it was "it's easier for the package maintainers" argument, but now it's taking them enough time to fix their shit that it's the same as it was before or worse.
Ubuntu has becoming embarassing.
Wasn't always this way, but corporate kinda hit the snooze button on development and it shows.
wow only 20 billion CPU cycles
When network is faster than browser cache
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31922762
i'm convinced that browser authors are morons
What? It launch in less than 1 second on my laptop, i7-1165G7, 16GB Ram, 512 NVE
what the hell it launches in only FOUR seconds on my sandia national labs supercomputer
5 seconds on the newest hardware
whoa so this is power of snap
Why is there a firefox snap?
Containers were a mistake.
Containers are a great idea. But like all things, morons misuse them.
containers are a superfluous concept for people who haven't heard of namespaces, union mounts, or static linkage
>namespaces, union mounts, or static linkage
Enjoy your bloat Mr Double Dubs.
mong
when I type chromium on my artix linux it just launches in 1 second or less
How often do you start a browser, huh? You do it once and then keep it running. This is a complete non-issue.
starts in .5 seconds in windows
is that supposed to sound impressive?
Chrome and Firefox open in microseconds for me
Is snap really that laggy?
Holy shit
Well, not all snaps are insanely slow. Yes, they're slower than plain old deb packages cause there's some snap overhead, but Firefox took like 400% performance hit (especially with startup) when they pushed it as a snap.
Some are usable, but some programs really don't work well with it.
Holy frick when are they going to just drop that shit. It starts basically instantly on fedora as a good ol' rpm, I don't see what was wrong with Firefox as deb other than it was maybe too fast to start up.
That shit took like 10 or 15s last time I tried Ubuntu, thought it didn't register the first enter, so I tried again, then after like 10s it screamed I tried opening two windows.
lol it used to load for 10 seconds? My os starts faster
>lol it used to load for 10 seconds?
anon that would be 100% slower, not 50% slower
qutebrowser opens in ms, why would i need more?