>best aesthetic
>best implementation of vertical tabs with nesting
>best tab management
>best AI summarization (hover over link for GPT summary of link)
but it's closed source and requires a login
Why can't freetards copy it?
freetards should copy Arc Browser
speaking of things I wish freetards would copy
>SigmaOS magic theme
FF Ultima goes some of the way.
checking it out rn thanks anon
>muh aesthetic
configure it however you want it to look the way windows users riced their winamp in 2000's and then have a nice day you mentally ill troony, adult men don't need any of this irrelevant shit because they only need stuff to be done
>I'm such a 1337 h4xx0r using software that looks like shit
take your own advice. homosexuals like you are why proprietary always wins.
when I want to look at pretty things I watch anime but since I am not a toddler that doesn't take up 100% of my life
True nothing beats the anesthetics of anime dicky
>since I am not a toddler that doesn't take up 100% of my life
No, you spend that shit posting on IQfy.
>adult men don't need any of this irrelevant shit because they only need stuff to be done
but you can make it more conpact then other browsers resulting in you having more space to get things done
>chromium
no thanks, i'll stick with librewolf.
Why doesn't anyone use webkit to develop a browser on linux and windows? Why is it simply chromium versus firefox when it should be a three way battle?
probably because webkit is trash?
Is it really? Safari is the best browsing experience I've had out of the box and I'm a big fan of Orion Browser and SigmaOS (Mac exclusive). They feel way better than Firefox or Chrome out of the box.
https://kagi.com/orion/
https://sigmaos.com/
>muh feel
that's all you have to say about a piece of shit that couldn't feel what webp looks like on a monitor even if its life depended on it?
Kagi has its own browser? Da fuq
safari (webkit) is the worst of the three, standards wise.
You can't even choose your own search engine fss. Safari is shit for low iq morons, boomers and women, like the whole apple ecosystem.
The actual issue that prevents webkit browsers outside of Apple OSes is DRM. Google doesn't make a DRM module for webkit, and every Windows/Linux browser except Edge uses Google Widevine to support DRM. Since no support for Spotify/Netflix means 99% of people will never use your browser, you'd have to be a massive freetard to try (hence Konqueror and Epiphany)
Because it is not that different from Blink.
Konqueror is webkit
Gnome browser is webkit.
>another chromium reskin
How about you freetards try making an actual web browser?
literal botnet
>new web browser
>look inside
>it's chrome
considering moronation ITT, it is indeed new, technology doesn't matter, UI must be different and le unique and feel le good or else le bad
perhaps if chrome and firefox felt good people wouldn't be leaving them in favor of shit like arc, shill lion and even fricking edge (on Linux)
sperg
maybe you should go get a job and buy some meth if feeling good is all you care about
>people leaving chromium
nope
>perhaps if chrome felt good people wouldn't be leaving them in favor of chrome with skins on top
>proud of using botnet
lol
Who said I'm proud of it? That's kind of the premise behind the thread.
moronic OP mocks FOSS and shills proprietary botnet
so obviously he's proud of using botnet, like the homosexual that he is
I'm not shilling anything. I'm telling freetards to copy it. Why does free always feel and look inferior to proprietary? It's literally right there for the taking.
nobody cares about your shitty GUI remodel, troony, do it yourself if you care so much
>closed source and requires a login
reminds me of warp terminal. very sus. avoid at all costs
>alashitty reskin with "AI"
lol, this is the power of rust, btw I tried alashitty and it stutters and uses 60MiB of RAM, very good software.
what's your terminal emulator of choice? I'm getting tired of alacritty
st (without any patches because my time isn't worthless)
gnome-console, already installed, the dark theme selected from the two available (because my time isn't worthless)
i'm using that shit, it actually makes sense for a browser to treat websites like apps, because that's pretty much what websites are now
What's the point of vertical tabs if they take up so much more screen space? It's a waste versus just having normal bookmarks
websites aren't made for widescreen, they're made for mobile shit, so you're not really giving up screen real estate
I have a 4K display so it's not like I need the screen space. Anyone using >=32 inches/1440p could switch over without it feeling like a loss.
I'd rather use Ladybird
Buy an ad
>critical of the browser
>smoothbrain homosexuals on IQfy think it's an advertisement
sideberry sucks ass and looks like shit
why would I want to use an extension versus native vertical tab support? not my fault mozilla has been sitting on the feature request for a decade
>sideberry sucks ass and looks like shit
are you blind and moronic? what meaningful difference is there in how it looks besides not having a moronic amount of padding for pinned tabs?
>why would I want to use an extension versus native vertical tab support?
why would I not want to use an extension when it provides better functionality? do you also refuse to use ublock origin?
There's a big difference between uBlock Origin and an external UI for tab management.
uBlock origin is an external UI for blocking UI in browser, midwit
AdBlock isn't a core functionality of a web browsing experience. Post a screenshot of your entire browser anon. Let's see it.
>making websites actually usable isn't core of web browsing
it's time to stop posting moronic ricetroon
>I don't think my browser should have a core UI personalization feature
and that's why your shitty browser will not only remain at the marketshare it is, but decline too.
I don't care about "market share", my browser is older than pathetic worthless thing you call your life.
>I don't care about market share
Enjoy your all chromium future then brainlet.
enjoy your manifest v3 experience
I'd argue ad blocking is more important than how the tabs are arranged, the web is pretty much unusable without adblockers
Never installing minimalist corporate schwarbage like that. I bet it doesn't even have extension support. Buy an ad fricko
Oh look, sure enough, here you are pretending it's OK. Any web browser that doesn't support extensions is strictly inferior to a web browser from 2007. Deprecated, unfinished software run by sanctimonious fartsniffers who think they know best for everyone else.
Post a screenshot of your browser you c**ts. I'd love to see what kind of garbled mess of a UI you find acceptable if you're unironically shilling SideBerry.
alright little guy have a look at my epic browser UI that's infinitely superior to yours
>looks like shit
>cant have decent vertical tabs in ff
Yep FF is flexible whereas most other browsers aren't on the subject of sidetabs. People expect me to use Brave when it takes a fricking decade for it to shrink/expand the panel (not adjustable) and opening new tabs is a chore. I think only Vivaldi sort of gets there. TST lets me color tabs to distinguish em and scroll through them with the scroll wheel too. Chromium based browsers are turbocucked and this is with Mozilla having taken away a lot of customization options throughout the years.
>extension does everything you could want and more
>b-but it's not native
Who gives a flying frick, browsers support extensions so people actually use them you gaywaffle.
I don't see how that's better than sidebery
There's Firefox extensions for all of that.
>aesthetics
>aesthetics
>aesthetics
>useless integration most people either don't want or already have a preferred solution for which you won't support
>login wall electron web app horseshit
you don't know shit about technology just buy a mac and frick off
https://thannymack.com/#Arc%20features%20that%20work%20better%20on%20Firefox
>extensions
>extensions
>extensions
also just go download this shit on github, navigate to your %appdata% folder, paste it in and run this .bat file for CSS customization that looks and feels like shit but make sure to follow the instructions or you'll brick your install :^)
>best aesthetic
Flat Design is fugly
omniweb had vertical tabs and it died in the arse
For me it's still troonyfox
arc browser + atlasOS or tiny11 for turbo botnetmaxxing
>but it's closed source
Does the license allow it?
>literally unusable without giving them your email
>onions devs everywhere
>VC money
You will never be a woman.
and how exactly does this browser makes money? even enough money to shill on IQfy? VC money is good and all, but you will have to pay them back someday, right? You shills must be here to shill it in 1 year time too, or else i may go back to brave.
Multiplayer browsing for enterprise
with brave shills it was obvious how they make money and it was obvious that for the most part the browser is not that glowy or VC money influenced. Here i get the idea that it is all VC money.
>>best aesthetic
That would be SeaMonkey.
>>best implementation of vertical tabs with nesting
Sidebery works well enough and I don't use it anyway.
>>best tab management
I don't have a complaint with Firefox's.
>>best AI summarization
Frick off. I do NOT want this.
TL;DR buy a fricking ad.
>Frick off. I do NOT want this.
ok luddite, just disable it sperg
also seamonkey and sideberry suck ass
the fact that you're saying seamonkey is acceptable aesthetically invalidates your entire post
I think you're an absolute gorilla for thinking Arc looks good in any way, so I guess we're even.
a lot of homosexual zoomers over here care more about tab decorations more than browser actually working and should kill themselves immediately
>browser actually working
meanwhile firefox bricks every 3 months and has difficulty rendering anything with more than five lines of javascript lmao nice projection freetard
I didn't witness any of this on my 14 year old hardware so I can only guess that you're one of those trannies that found xer 2005 Thinkpad in a trashcan and corebooted it or something and now the only thing left to do for you is larp about aesthetics of browser as the moment you open it that's the last thing you will ever see before the monitor dies
>14 year old hardware
you spend all day behind your computer and it's not even decent hardware? get a job and stop being poor
no I just simply have an old laptop that I didn't throw away yet because it still works, and don't talk about jobs to me while your hardware lags on firefox...
Yeah I'm sure my 7800X3D, 64GB of DDR5 and RTX 4090 is to blame and not incompetent freetards and their shoddy programming.
yeah I can tell that the hardware you totally bought yourself and didn't acquire it from your parent's donations to make-a-fricking-loser-son foundation isn't even running firefox because little timmy over here cannot install novideo drivers let alone setup firefox to actually benefit from them.
My 14 year old hardware runs it fine without hardware accelleration btw seems like you have some neural degenerative disease already, sell your hardware and pay a private doctor a visit before it's too late...
>Arc looks le bad because I said so
ok you contrarian c**t
I am not the 12 year old (somehow younger than my hardware) who cares about these things so you can stop projecting and go have a nice day moronic toddler.
>I don't care about the user experience or basic aesthetics
and that's why we'll have a chromium monopoly in due time. Don't blame me but I'm not artificially going to keep it alive by contributing to their tanking marketshare either. Make a decent product that's better than proprietary or frick off.
user experience isn't impacted by colors of buttons and considering I can change them it's not my problem, keep huffing that cope while you use a browser that supports nothing but manifest v3 and doesn't work without online account
>muh manifest v3 boogeyman
>installs uBlock Origin and Violentmonkey
ok and how did that affect me exactly?
>his new shiny browser doesn't have adblock by default
great user experience lil timmy
edge is perfect
wow closed source chromium with a skin slapped on it, I must switch asap.
this but unironically
getting tired of brave
go outside then, terminally ill homosexual
>nooooooo YOU CANT DO THAT YOU CANT DO THAT DONT BRING DOWN MY MARKETSHARE NNNNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOO!@*@!*@!*!@@!(!@!@
nobody cares about your brand wars moronic troony, go outside
>I'M NOT COPING I'M NOT COPING AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
>requires login
>chrome
what is the point of using it? Doesn't even look good.
>2 users
very cool
That looks gay as hell
tasteless pleb filtered
Sorry I'm not trans
building a browser takes away from building linux distributions
linux is for gays
>swift
slow and bloated garbage
You want it. You make it.
I don't want it.
because this is the best freetards are able to do by themselves. (posted from arc browser on windows)
Design wise it's how it's supposed to be and it would be a decent fit if you used GNOME, but functionally it's a worthless piece of shit browser.
Edge already has vertical tab, I'm good
i used to use edge too but microsoft made it unbearable with their bullshit, arc does something similar but better
I want "just a browser". No bloat. I'm seriously considering moving over to Ladybird once its rendering engine gets better. It already works well on sites not infected with zoomerscript.
what is going on with this browser? it just feels so fricking weird to look at.
the advertising, the weird shill threads, the ui, the way the company presents itself... so fricking weird.
this has to be some kind of weird government psyop, there is no other explanation.
I'll stick to Firefox
looks like the same normieslop mac ripoff shit people have been posting for years. Like elementaryOS.
you can get all of that in firefox
misaligned toolbar
ecks dee you freetards will tolerate the ugliest shit it's unreal
at least
makes a compelling argument, as long as we ignore the ugliest IQfy theme in history on display
it looks like gnome web (epiphany)
garbage. Doesn't work on IoT Enterprise LTSC Windows 10.
Holy frick. I hate normies so much it's unreal. They're selling their browser based on Arc Boosts, i.e. literal tampermonkey/stylus script