>gets filtered by Narnia
>goes to hell
Your perspective on the ending of Narnia tells me your political views.
 It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
 |
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
>gets filtered by Narnia. >goes to hell
>gets filtered by Narnia
>goes to hell
Your perspective on the ending of Narnia tells me your political views.
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
|
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
I think it overhyped Turkish delight. Shit's nasty.
Nah homie you're wrong
Rose water tastes like something you shouldn't eat without a stomach pump and you know it
Yes just eat some delicious high fructose corn syrup instead goyim, it’s good for you.
the problem with turkish delight is that it is meant to be eaten with black coffee so it is often too sweet
The problem with Turkish Delight is that its Rutger Hauer's most underrated film.
>Turkish delight
code for anal sex, cf downtown abbey
People used to have so little choice in sweets if that was considered to be a delicacy. Give me caramelized fried almonds over this any day.
Its just a shittier version of applets and cotlets.
Susan didn't get barred from heaven for being a bawd, she got barred because she's still alive lol. The fact that she became a bawd was incidental
Why is this so hard for 'tards to comprehend?
I thought it was supposed to be because she stopped believing in Narnia.
Not believing in Narnia is the reason she didn't join everyone else in that adventure
Going to furry heaven wasn't on the table at that point in time
>another brainlet filtered
Susan was barred from heaven because she stopped believing in Narnia (her partygirl status was incidental to this), but C.S. Lewis didn't want to send her to hell and instead gave her a chance at redemption.
>live for years in this fantasy kingdom
>go back to being kid again, no proof you were ever there, no time passed
>your wisdom as an adult evaporates
>become convinced that it was all a game you played when you were younger
>this is your fault somehow
Susan did nothing wrong
Why is a 24 year old “woman” — who looks 35 — making chinktok videos about kid books? Moreover, how can someone misuse POV?
Now it's more common for people to misuse POV
White girls misuse POV, white guys misuse "The Faustian Spirit".
>Moreover, how can someone misuse POV?
You ever see that pic with the apples in people's heads? These people are the 1s.
>You ever see that pic with the apples in people's heads? These people are the 1s.
You mean 5s?
No way these people actually exist and are humans. Like do these people not have dreams and memories?
Yeah I don't believe people don't have internal monologues or cannot visualize their thoughts. That doesn't seem possible.
I can't visualize thought. My memory is visually blank, when I recall things they are like motions, a mental sketchpad except everything is drawn simultaneously. If I imagine a house, its the triangle over a square a child would draw, if I imagine my house or a Frank Lloyd Wright house or the house that I imagine a redneck who won the lottery would build the image gets more detailed but its still just an outline. If I try to focus on a detail I just get words, like if I "zoom" in on my houses windowbox and the red geraniums in them I stop visualizing and just have the thought of "windowbox with geraniums". If I want to visualize them I would have to wipe the sketchpad clean and start over.
This probably is how a lot of people perceive things. People talk about visual dreams, but dream objects have what Freud calls condesation, one object representing multiple things. Of course it might visually morph in your dream, but I suspect it is actually multiple words or concepts being associated with one object, your brain rationalizing it after the fact.
Is this Elvira from scarface?
Maybe? I haven't seen Scarface (1983). I have an inner monologue and an IQ of 91.
Perfect
I've got an iq of 777
You both seriously underestimate how stupid the average person is
The "how stupid the average person is and realize half of them are stupider than that" quote really is true, isn't it?
I'd have to kind of blindly grope my way into feeling an apple in my mind's eye but couldn't actually envision the thing.
My visual memory is crap but good at just remembering the facts, at least as they appear to me. Couldn't tell you what anyone's face looks like past the basics like eye/hair color etc. For example, wouldn't be able to just picture people's faces off the top of my head, that's including my own mother. But I can still recognize them if I see them, so it's not like I'm face blind.
I do have an inner monologue.
>Close your eyes and imagine an apple. What do you see?
The forbidden fruit
I read a study on this, the lack of internal monologue and inability to picture/imagine things mentally.
Its EXTREMELY prevalent among genz, some millennials have it, very few in gen x. They said that this is because gen x and also a good chunk of millennials "adopted" tech, and aren't tech native, while gen z is tech native and access to ipads from basically birth fricks up internal monologue to the point of erasing it completely.
Vast majority of gen z in the first world are literal unthinking flesh automatons.
I'm Gen Z (or I guess cusp because I was born in '96) and I have a strong internal monologue and capacity to visualize.
Gen Z here. I have an internal (and an external) monologue, but I noticed recently that it gets drowned out when I'm actively distracted by something, like when I'm talking to someone or listening to music in the car, or even typing this post right now. It's possible that the reason why kids now don't think they have internal monologues is because they're constantly distracted by social media / Netflix / whatever.
Note that I say "don't think they have" it; I'm certain if you put any of these people in a padded cell with no stimulation they would start having internal conversations, because otherwise what would they do? Become vegetables?
Source?
what's this supposed to mean? i can envision and build frameworks in my head but not physical objects.
Means you're aphantasic. It's commona and it doesn't necessarily mean you're low IQ, but it does mean you're missing a crucial component of what it means to be human. Tell me: can you enjoy fantasy or sci-fi? When you read it what goes through your head?
>Tell me: can you enjoy fantasy or sci-fi?
yeah i loved reading LoTR and watching trek and babylon 5, wish i had time to watch stargate.
>when i read what goes through my head
information
i don't subvocalize. do you?
>>when i read what goes through my head
>information
So you just perceive it as data? Like an RPG stats table or quest log? That's so strange to me because when I read fiction I'm literally in the world or watching it play out before my eyes at least.
>i don't subvocalize. do you?
I think that's irrelevant. Sometimes I do.
>Means you're aphantasic
Not real, no dude I refuse to believe this is an actual phenomenon.
Why?
Huh?
I’m so sick of this meme. Everyone is #5. You can’t just make up an imaginary apple out if thin air.
Whenever a woman tells you she reads there's a 90% chance she means children's books
Doesn't she get blacked on onlyfans?
She do be built for it.
Idk i don't read children IQfyslop. Read something challenging and bleak like The Trial or Songs of a Dead Dreamer. It would open your horizon.
>bleak
>challenging
>the trial
Kek
It really is. But you fricking live in happy la-la land. Get real. Eh... what's the fricking point?
Kafka is a comedian and you are mentally weak loser for finding it bleak and not comedic
>Implying something bleak can not be funny.
Narnia is really bad, I dont know why people here like it, if you want light fantasy, read Le Guin
The Magician's Nephew opens up a major plot hole in the series.
>Jadis escapes to London, starts to threaten some people with an iron rod ripped from a lamppost
>the children take Jadis and others back to Narnia, along with a few other humans
>the iron rod ends up growing into a lamppost in Narnia
>Jadis comes across Edmund and the lamppost
>She's more interested in the siblings and the prophecy rather than realizing Edmund is her ticket out
>gets defeated by Aslan rather than escaping into Great Britain and taking advantage of World War II to establish herself as supreme ruler
Jadis had no power on Earth, she tried to use magic and failed. Even in Narnia her power was weak and she needed centuries to build up magic and forces after eating the silver immortality apple. If she got back to Earth somehow, she likely wouldn't be able to become ruler without powers. Though she might live forever, she was still able to be physically killed.
Grow up, you manchildren. Discuss real literature
She looks cute. I'm going to donate to her fundraiser.
Congratulations, you sponsored a thief/rapist/murderer's bail
This was the person in question
Oh no! Which of these other causes should I donate to instead?
Narnia is for kids. If you enjoy Narnia and admit so you should be held down and sodomized by a HIV pozzed jogger
Were it my order, I would have every anon in this thread sodomized repeatedly.
Narnia is peak cozy. My mom read the whole series to me when I was really little and I'm pretty sure that's the reason I love reading so much.
I love you, Mom.
Stop posting trannies